Lodinews.com

default avatar
Welcome to the site! Login or Signup below.
|
||
Logout|My Dashboard

Roman historian did write about Jesus

Print
Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size

Posted: Friday, November 23, 2007 10:00 pm | Updated: 9:46 am, Tue Aug 27, 2013.

In the neat world of Ralph Matthews, "No Roman historian wrote about Jesus." Except one did!

Josephus, descendent of the Macabees, formerly a priest, was captured leading a Galileean revolt against Rome, 70 A.D. A clever talker, he ingratiated himself to Vespasian, earning a commission to write a history of the Jewish people. Of Herod he wrote that many Jews were glad of his defeat, just deserts for treacherously killing John the Baptist. Of Jesus he wrote:

"Now there was about this time Jesus, a wise man, if it be lawful to call him a man; for he was a doer of wonderful works, a teacher of such men as receive the truth with pleasure. He drew over to him both many of the Jews and many of the Gentiles.

"He was the Christ. And when Pilate, at the suggestion of the principal men amongst us, had condemned him to the cross, those that loved him at the first did not forsake him; for he appeared to them alive again the third day; as the divine prophets had foretold these and ten thousand other wonderful things concerning him. And the tribe of Christians, so named from him, are not extinct at this day."

"Forgery!" atheists yell, arguing that Josephus, a Jew, wouldn't have regarded Jesus so highly.

But many Jews, including the Apostles, did, in fact, continue synagogue worship while loving Jesus. Absolutely nothing suspicious about Josephus honoring Jesus while remaining Jewish.

Far richer in history are the Jewish source documents, the histories and letters of Luke, Paul, John and dozens of others. But if Ralph rejects Josephus because he, supposedly, shouldn't have respected Jesus, he rejects these writers precisely because they did! Like the Red Queen, "Verdict first! Evidence later!" Atheists let no testimony pierce their cocoon. Why? Let an historian say.

"Contrary to popular belief, atheism is not primarily an intellectual revolt, it is a moral revolt. Atheists don't find God invisible so much as objectionable. They aren't adjusting their desires to the truth, but rather the truth to fit their desires." - Historian Dinesh D'Souza.

Peter Stearns

Lodi

Rules of Conduct

  • 1 Use your real name. You must register with your full first and last name before you can comment. (And don’t pretend you’re someone else.)
  • 2 Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually oriented language.
  • 3 Don’t threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
  • 4 Be truthful. Don't lie about anyone or anything. Don't post unsubstantiated allegations, rumors or gossip that could harm the reputation of a person, company or organization.
  • 5 Be nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
  • 6 Stay on topic. Make sure your comments are about the story. Don’t insult each other.
  • 7 Tell us if the discussion is getting out of hand. Use the ‘Report’ link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
  • 8 Share what you know, and ask about what you don't.
  • 9 Don’t be a troll.
  • 10 Don’t reveal personal information about other commenters. You may reveal your own personal information, but we advise you not to do so.
  • 11 We reserve the right, at our discretion, to monitor, delete or choose not to post any comment. This may include removing or monitoring posts that we believe violate the spirit or letter of these rules, or that we otherwise determine at our discretion needs to be monitored, not posted, or deleted.

Welcome to the discussion.

2 comments:

  • posted at 9:49 am on Sat, Nov 24, 2007.

    Posts:

    you quoted;("Contrary to popular belief, atheism is not primarily an intellectual revolt, it is a moral revolt. Atheists don't find God invisible so much as objectionable. They aren't adjusting their desires to the truth, but rather the truth to fit their desires." Historian Dinesh D'Souza.) thats a 100% accurate statement. it's not an "amount of evidence" issue (as their is sufficentcy), it is ALWAYS an I DON'T WANT TO purposeful roadblock. no amount of eyewitness testimony or evidence will matter. if there was no God, it wouldn't matter (but it does)

     
  • posted at 9:42 am on Sat, Nov 24, 2007.

    Posts:

    proof via history meted out in the perfect amount. overwhelming evidence to most? nope. albeit there is IF investigated with a heart that searches for ultimate truth. but the surface level of evidence that demonstrates Gods wisdom, is the kind where there's "just enough" to require that the heart enters the equation (faith/belief). without that, there is no LOVE. there is only "information". "just enough" makes the journey from the "head" to the "heart" complete. i love that

     

Video

Popular Stories

Poll

Loading…

Your News

News for the community, by the community.

Mailing List

Subscribe to a mailing list to have daily news sent directly to your inbox.

  • Breaking News

    Would you like to receive breaking news alerts? Sign up now!

  • News Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily news headlines? Sign up now!

  • Sports Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily sports headlines? Sign up now!

Manage Your Lists