default avatar
Welcome to the site! Login or Signup below.
Logout|My Dashboard

Should the U.S. government be allowed to use drone strikes against U.S. citizens?

Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size

Posted: Tuesday, February 12, 2013 12:00 am

NBC News reported last week that a confidential Justice Department memo concludes that the U.S. government can order the killing of American citizens if they are believed to be “senior operational leaders” of al-Qaida or “an associated force” — even if there is no intelligence indicating they are engaged in an active plot to attack the U.S.

Asked by News-Sentinel photographer Ian Jonsson during the Wine and Chocolate event in Downtown Lodi
J.D. Worland Amy Kain Harold Newbill Kendra Bruno Wayne Hult
Galt Manteca Sacramento Stockton Stockton
Unemployed Sales associate Business owner Substitute teacher Self-employed
“No. It just sounds sketchy.” “No. Why would we be attacking our own people?” “I would agree, as long as there is proper oversight “No. It is unconstitutional, so I don’t understand how it could be OK’d without a vote.” “No. When you reach a certain age, you come to realize that any loss of life is not OK and collateral damage is unacceptable.”

Rules of Conduct

  • 1 Use your real name. You must register with your full first and last name before you can comment. (And don’t pretend you’re someone else.)
  • 2 Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually oriented language.
  • 3 Don’t threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
  • 4 Be truthful. Don't lie about anyone or anything. Don't post unsubstantiated allegations, rumors or gossip that could harm the reputation of a person, company or organization.
  • 5 Be nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
  • 6 Stay on topic. Make sure your comments are about the story. Don’t insult each other.
  • 7 Tell us if the discussion is getting out of hand. Use the ‘Report’ link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
  • 8 Share what you know, and ask about what you don't.
  • 9 Don’t be a troll.
  • 10 Don’t reveal personal information about other commenters. You may reveal your own personal information, but we advise you not to do so.
  • 11 We reserve the right, at our discretion, to monitor, delete or choose not to post any comment. This may include removing or monitoring posts that we believe violate the spirit or letter of these rules, or that we otherwise determine at our discretion needs to be monitored, not posted, or deleted.

Welcome to the discussion.


  • Jerome Kinderman posted at 8:01 am on Thu, Mar 21, 2013.

    Jerome R Kinderman Posts: 2365

    But Mr. Liebich, what about Mr. Newbill's suggestion that he wouldn't oppose such an idea as long as there is “proper oversight?” Shouldn't that be enough to make us feel all warm and fuzzy about Americans being marked for extermination by an un-manned drone?

    Of course I make light of both the notion and Mr. Newbill's ignorant suggestion and applaud the other four up there who said "no." Still, it's sad that out of the five only one (Ms. Bruno) came even close to understanding the absurdity of permitting such a thing from happening.

    This is an excellent example of why the Second Amendment was included in the Bill of Rights. Four out of five Americans obviously have no idea what's in the Bill of Rights (leave alone the balance of our Constitution), but at least four of them still object to this very stupid (and illegal) proposition.

    I wonder though how the Nobel folks now feel about awarding their coveted Peace Prize to our very hawkish President. Is there any way for them to repeal that while Obama continues to try to get around the Constitution?

  • Andrew Liebich posted at 5:48 pm on Mon, Feb 25, 2013.

    Andrew Liebich Posts: 2999

    The American system of criminal justice is supposed to be based on the idea that one is innocent until proven guilty. Now, not only are we guilty until proven innocent, but apparently, proof is no longer required.

    How can the DOJ "ensure fair and impartial administration of justice for all Americans" as its mission statement claims it must when it is calling for the outright extrajudicial slaying of American citizens?

    Since Barack Obama recently took it upon himself to label himself 'dictator' with free will to kill Americans with drones, isn’t it time that Americans learn how to fight back and kill drones?

    The following article informs Americans who are completely disgusted with the 'Police State' our once free nation has become on how to kill UAV’s. If UAV’s are going to be used to kill Americans, Americans might want to learn how to fight back.



Recent Comments

Posted 16 hours ago by Shane Marcus.

Posted 16 hours ago by Shane Marcus.

article: Woman, 56, arrested after car slams int…

Start getting your things in order, because you going to prison...


Posted 16 hours ago by Shane Marcus.

article: Lodi water rates to go up

What's the average water bill in Lodi, and what would 2% bring it up to?


Posted 16 hours ago by Thomas Heuer.

article: Letter: Michael Brown started events th…

[thumbup] Great point Mike. I missed that and I'm sure a lot more did too.


Posted 16 hours ago by Thomas Heuer.

article: Letter: Police officer did his job

Mike Knowing the political shifts that have gone on between republicans and democrats I avoid the mix-ups by using conservatives and libera…



Popular Stories



Your News

News for the community, by the community.

Mailing List

Subscribe to a mailing list to have daily news sent directly to your inbox.

  • Breaking News

    Would you like to receive breaking news alerts? Sign up now!

  • News Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily news headlines? Sign up now!

  • Sports Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily sports headlines? Sign up now!

Manage Your Lists