Should the U.S. government be allowed to use drone strikes against U.S. citizens?
-
Print
-
Create a hardcopy of this page
-
Font Size:
-
Default font size
-
Larger font size
Posted: Tuesday, February 12, 2013 12:00 am
Should the U.S. government be allowed to use drone strikes against U.S. citizens?
Posted in
Street scene
on
Tuesday, February 12, 2013 12:00 am.
(%remaining%) Remaining
Thanks for visiting Lodinews.com. You're entitled to view 20 free articles every 30 days. You will see 10 articles for free before being asked to register, and then you can view 10 additional articles by registering or logging in. Then, if you enjoy our site and want full access, we'll ask you to purchase an affordable subscription.
(%remaining%) Remaining
Thanks for visiting Lodinews.com. You're entitled to view 20 free articles every 30 days, and you currently have (%remaining%) free articles remaining ((%remaining_reg%) before being asked to register and (%remaining_sub%) before being asked to subscribe). Then, if you enjoy our site and want full access, we'll ask you to purchase an affordable subscription.
(%remaining%) Remaining
Thanks for visiting Lodinews.com. You're entitled to view 20 free articles every 30 days, and you currently have (%remaining%) free articles remaining ((%remaining_reg%) before being asked to register and (%remaining_sub%) before being asked to subscribe). Then, if you enjoy our site and want full access, we'll ask you to purchase an affordable subscription.
(%remaining%) Remaining
Thanks for visiting Lodinews.com. You're entitled to view 20 free articles every 30 days, and you currently have (%remaining%) total free articles remaining ((%remaining_reg%) before being asked to register and (%remaining_sub%) before being asked to subscribe). Then, if you enjoy our site and want full access, we'll ask you to purchase an affordable subscription.
(%remaining%) Remaining
Thank you for reading Lodinews.com. You have viewed (%viewed%) of your 20 free pages in 30 days. Please login or register at this time and enjoy the next (%remaining%) articles free of charge. After your 20 free articles, we'll ask you to purchase an affordable subscription.
(%remaining%) Remaining
Thank you for reading Lodinews.com. Because you have already viewed this article, you may view it again as many times as you would like without subtracting from your remaining free article views.
(%remaining%) Remaining
Thank you for registering on Lodinews.com. You're entitled to view 20 articles for free every 30 days, and you currently have (%remaining%) remaining. Then, if you enjoy our site and want full access, we'll ask you to purchase an affordable subscription.
(%remaining%) Remaining
Thank you for reading Lodinews.com. You're entitled to view 20 articles for free every 30 days, and you currently have (%remaining%) remaining. Then, if you enjoy our site and want full access, we'll ask you to purchase an affordable subscription.
(%remaining%) Remaining
Thank you for reading Lodinews.com. You're entitled to view 20 articles for free every 30 days, and you currently have (%remaining%) remaining. Then, if you enjoy our site and want full access, we'll ask you to purchase an affordable subscription.
(%remaining%) Remaining
Thank you for reading Lodinews.com. You're entitled to view 20 articles for free every 30 days. This is your last free article this period. On your next article we'll ask you to purchase an affordable subscription.
(%remaining%) Remaining
Thank you for reading 20 free articles on our site. You can come back at the end of your 30-day period for another 20 free articles, or you can purchase a subscription at this time and continue to enjoy valuable local news and information. If you need help, please contact our office at 209-369-2761.
Jerome Kinderman posted at 8:01 am on Thu, Mar 21, 2013.
But Mr. Liebich, what about Mr. Newbill's suggestion that he wouldn't oppose such an idea as long as there is “proper oversight?” Shouldn't that be enough to make us feel all warm and fuzzy about Americans being marked for extermination by an un-manned drone?
Of course I make light of both the notion and Mr. Newbill's ignorant suggestion and applaud the other four up there who said "no." Still, it's sad that out of the five only one (Ms. Bruno) came even close to understanding the absurdity of permitting such a thing from happening.
This is an excellent example of why the Second Amendment was included in the Bill of Rights. Four out of five Americans obviously have no idea what's in the Bill of Rights (leave alone the balance of our Constitution), but at least four of them still object to this very stupid (and illegal) proposition.
I wonder though how the Nobel folks now feel about awarding their coveted Peace Prize to our very hawkish President. Is there any way for them to repeal that while Obama continues to try to get around the Constitution?
Andrew Liebich posted at 5:48 pm on Mon, Feb 25, 2013.
The American system of criminal justice is supposed to be based on the idea that one is innocent until proven guilty. Now, not only are we guilty until proven innocent, but apparently, proof is no longer required.
How can the DOJ "ensure fair and impartial administration of justice for all Americans" as its mission statement claims it must when it is calling for the outright extrajudicial slaying of American citizens?
Since Barack Obama recently took it upon himself to label himself 'dictator' with free will to kill Americans with drones, isn’t it time that Americans learn how to fight back and kill drones?
The following article informs Americans who are completely disgusted with the 'Police State' our once free nation has become on how to kill UAV’s. If UAV’s are going to be used to kill Americans, Americans might want to learn how to fight back.
http://beforeitsnews.com/alternative/2013/02/how-to-kill-a-drone-since-drones-can-kill-americans-americans-can-kill-drones-heres-how-2556926.html