default avatar
Welcome to the site! Login or Signup below.
Logout|My Dashboard

Letter: There can be no saints from post-Vatican II church

Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size

Posted: Saturday, March 1, 2014 12:00 am

Many have a wrong notion that apostasy is outright total rejection of Most Holy Triune God. No, “modernism” is actually the most dangerous form of apostasy. It stays within the church to corrupt through compromise.

A “modernist” infuses “his” will into or onto the Will of God. For instance, let’s suppose God gave you a gift of a refrigerator that exemplified His perfection in creation. (I have always been given this analogy, because its something you see everyday with a large, broad side). The “modernist” will immediately slap his hand onto it. Obsessive or not, his “hand print” must be left.

The Rosary is a “high” form of prayer because it involves the “joint life” of Christ and His mother Mary. Both hearts were pierced (Luke 2:35). A “yes” to Most Holy Triune God at Annunciation “will” do that.

St. Dominic was given the Rosary by Mary (ultimately by Christ, because Mary never did anything contrary to Him). Divine numbers themselves tell a story. I’m not going to explain everything now, but just stress the fact that you can’t add a luminous (of the mind, not heart) Mystery without upsetting the apple cart.

“3” represents Most Holy Triune God: The Sorrowful Mysteries were placed in the center because the fifth (Grace) involves the Fruit of Christ’s Sacrifice (the Eucharist) in His Crucifixion. From the Cross, all Grace flows eternally “backward and forward.”

John Paul II (as do all “modernists”) had an excuse for his adaptation: the Eucharist. But you must remember the Sorrowful Mysteries always traditionally represented the Eucharist in the Crucifixion (the Fruit of His Sacrifice and the cornerstone of the Most Holy Sacrifice of the Mass.)

No Last Supper without His Sacrifice. Latin Tridentine Mass had proper focus: Alter Tabernacle Crucifix are One in Christ’s Sacrifice (not a Protestant banquet table).

I could write reams of paper on John Paul’s compromises. But understand this: “Modernists” of Vatican II cannot be Saints. With Jonah in mind, I’m not going to tell you how Most Holy Triune God will act. But His Holiness demands action. Communion of Saints or modernists? The Cross— return or renewal?

Ron Arthur


Rules of Conduct

  • 1 Use your real name. You must register with your full first and last name before you can comment. (And don’t pretend you’re someone else.)
  • 2 Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually oriented language.
  • 3 Don’t threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
  • 4 Be truthful. Don't lie about anyone or anything. Don't post unsubstantiated allegations, rumors or gossip that could harm the reputation of a person, company or organization.
  • 5 Be nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
  • 6 Stay on topic. Make sure your comments are about the story. Don’t insult each other.
  • 7 Tell us if the discussion is getting out of hand. Use the ‘Report’ link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
  • 8 Share what you know, and ask about what you don't.
  • 9 Don’t be a troll.
  • 10 Don’t reveal personal information about other commenters. You may reveal your own personal information, but we advise you not to do so.
  • 11 We reserve the right, at our discretion, to monitor, delete or choose not to post any comment. This may include removing or monitoring posts that we believe violate the spirit or letter of these rules, or that we otherwise determine at our discretion needs to be monitored, not posted, or deleted.

Welcome to the discussion.


  • Kevin Paglia posted at 8:55 am on Sat, Mar 1, 2014.

    Kevin Paglia Posts: 2081

    It strikes me that Mr. Arthur was born in the wrong era. He would have been vary happy back in Jesus' age as a Sadducees. They loved tradition and hated it when that tradition changed. Probably why they ejected Jesus so strongly. He was about bringing God the Father to the people. He rejected the status quo that gave power to the establishment but rather made Himself accessible to ALL. Yes, Mr. Arthur would definitely have been very happy as a Sadducees.

  • David Diskin posted at 8:25 am on Sat, Mar 1, 2014.

    David Diskin Posts: 184



Recent Comments

Posted 22 hours ago by Ed Walters.

article: Letter: Michael Brown started events th…

Barrow, no need to retract the truth, and I can pretend all I like. I spoke of useless lives of which Charlie leads the mob, followed by …


Posted Yesterday by robert maurer.

article: Letter: Michael Brown started events th…

Shhh, Ed; my post using the word thug will probably be removed now ... On another note: Jien; I was not referring to M.Brown in my post at …


Posted Yesterday by Ed Walters.

article: Lodi Electric Utility announces 2015 So…

Navarro: a three legged horse at the Kentucky Derby has a better chance to win than you do, best of luck anyway. [wink]


Posted Yesterday by Eric Barrow.

article: Letter: U.S. suffers from total lack of…

This is a recurring theme among conservatives that by helping those in need liberals are somehow hurting those same people. I suppose it he…


Posted Yesterday by Mike Adams.

article: Letter: U.S. suffers from total lack of…

Robert: A strange car on a dark lonely road while may be suspicious is not probable cause to be pulled over. Anytime we drive outside of o…



Popular Stories



Your News

News for the community, by the community.

Mailing List

Subscribe to a mailing list to have daily news sent directly to your inbox.

  • Breaking News

    Would you like to receive breaking news alerts? Sign up now!

  • News Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily news headlines? Sign up now!

  • Sports Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily sports headlines? Sign up now!

Manage Your Lists