Lodinews.com

default avatar
Welcome to the site! Login or Signup below.
|
||
Logout|My Dashboard

Atheists are revising American history

Print
Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size

Posted: Saturday, August 10, 2013 12:00 am

It is truly shameful that one who rejects the Bible’s truths (David Diskin’s letter of Aug. 3) feels compelled to twist God’s Word and revise U.S. history to support the atheist lie that America was not founded upon Christian principles.

Defeating Diskin’s entire Strawman Army would take a hundred years of letters to the editor, but let me kill just one today. In support of his perverse abuse of the Bible, he marches out the atheists’ favorite “patriotic” strawman, the 1797 Treaty of Tripoli.

Atheists like Diskin put their faith in a misreading of one sentence in Article 11 of the treaty, which merely assures a Muslim ruler that our government is not a Christian theocracy.

That sentence reads: “The government of the United States of America is not in any sense founded on the Christian religion.” (avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/bar1796n.asp)

Those who rely upon that single sentence incorrectly infer an explicit denial of the incorporation of the Christian worldview (not “religion”) in America’s founding documents and, therefore, in our form of government. Such people believe that this irrelevant treaty (it never went into effect) is more authoritative than the Constitution and all of American history. How silly is that?

That sentence did not say — and it would be a lie if it did — that the Christian God wasn’t mentioned four times in the Declaration of Independence, at least one of which is an explicit prayer to Jesus Christ “appealing to the Supreme Judge of the world (John 5:22-23).”

It didn’t say that the Christian doctrines of free will and original sin weren’t, respectively, the basis of each American’s (even atheists) individual sovereignty and the “founding fear” of sinful people in power; which fear is the premise of the Constitution’s doctrine of republican government that is delegated only enumerated powers that are limited by being divided and “checked and balanced.”

The Constitution is founded upon the most empirical of Christian doctrines — that people are innately inclined toward sin, a doctrine explicitly rejected by atheists who believe that people are born “basically good” (least morally neutral).

Michael Nedderman

Citrus Heights

Rules of Conduct

  • 1 Use your real name. You must register with your full first and last name before you can comment. (And don’t pretend you’re someone else.)
  • 2 Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually oriented language.
  • 3 Don’t threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
  • 4 Be truthful. Don't lie about anyone or anything. Don't post unsubstantiated allegations, rumors or gossip that could harm the reputation of a person, company or organization.
  • 5 Be nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
  • 6 Stay on topic. Make sure your comments are about the story. Don’t insult each other.
  • 7 Tell us if the discussion is getting out of hand. Use the ‘Report’ link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
  • 8 Share what you know, and ask about what you don't.
  • 9 Don’t be a troll.
  • 10 Don’t reveal personal information about other commenters. You may reveal your own personal information, but we advise you not to do so.
  • 11 We reserve the right, at our discretion, to monitor, delete or choose not to post any comment. This may include removing or monitoring posts that we believe violate the spirit or letter of these rules, or that we otherwise determine at our discretion needs to be monitored, not posted, or deleted.

Welcome to the discussion.

2 comments:

  • Michael Nedderman posted at 1:28 am on Fri, Sep 20, 2013.

    Mike Nedderman Posts: 45

    OK Mr. Diskin, this comment, mistakenly posted to Ms. Figueroa's letter, belongs here:

    You disappoint me Mr. Diskin. I anticipated much better from you.


    My letter above thoroughly refutes your use of the Treaty of Tripoli—and you don’t provide a substantive response? Please note that this is the second time I have layed out the following detailed litany of how you have utterly failed to address the clear, cogent, and concisely expressed points made in my 8/10/13 letter.

    In your comments on Shawnte Figueroa’s letter (“Is U.S. a secular nation or a theocracy?”), you predicted that I would insult you—well, it appears that you have “beat me to the punch” in that regard with a response that can only be described as boorish—gaping your mouth—please, Mr. D, spare me and the other readers—such bad manners!


    In addition to thoroughly refuting your use of the Treaty of Tripoli, my letter also provided you with the Christian basis of, and the connection between, the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution, facts about which you seem totally ignorant (my next letter elaborates upon the Christian nature of that connection).


    Please tell me, Mr. D, why your response here isn’t an admission that you cannot respond, and that you are conceding with your boorish non-response. Wouldn’t it be better to just humbly admit that you are wrong?


    Since you have conceded (even if you object, it is so, so, so very obvious), I hope you are honest enough not to ever use the Treaty of Tripoli ever again (I’ll be watching…). And, because of your concession, that prohibition also applies to you not ever again claiming that the Founders didn’t use their Christian worldview when incorporating Christian principles into the Constitution (yes, that was also in my letter).

     
  • David Diskin posted at 8:59 pm on Mon, Sep 9, 2013.

    David Diskin Posts: 178

    Mr Nedderman, since you requested multiple times for me to respond to this article, here I am.

    My official response is:

    [yawn]

     

Recent Comments

Posted 6 hours ago by Thomas Heuer.

article: Editorial: Let’s take a deeper look at …

This has been a real silly argument. Hot, uncomfortable bleachers is not a tradition worth maintaining if you can't upgrade an already up…

More...

Posted 6 hours ago by Simon Birch.

article: Letter: The path to Benghazi

Thomas: I was doing some work in the comments admin. Nothing sinister, although I'm sure someone will accuse me of conspiring with the Musl…

More...

Posted 7 hours ago by Jerome Kinderman.

article: Letter: Questions for Obama supporters

Oh sure, it was real alright. But if one looks at the polls right now regarding Barack Hussein Obama's performance, me things there's a tad…

More...

Posted 9 hours ago by stan taves.

article: Letter: Questions for Obama supporters

The load that the left bought -- but have yet to pay for -- is real. It's really real; but until you actually have to pay for it, you won't…

More...

Posted 10 hours ago by Mike Adams.

article: Letter: Obama may be protecting his chi…

Hey, you're right about something! That picture didn't change my mind one bit.

More...

Video

Popular Stories

Poll

Loading…

Mailing List

Subscribe to a mailing list to have daily news sent directly to your inbox.

  • Breaking News

    Would you like to receive breaking news alerts? Sign up now!

  • News Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily news headlines? Sign up now!

  • Sports Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily sports headlines? Sign up now!

Manage Your Lists