Lodinews.com

default avatar
Welcome to the site! Login or Signup below.
|
||
Logout|My Dashboard

United States was not founded on Christian principles

Print
Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size

Posted: Saturday, August 3, 2013 12:00 am

Pastor Frank Nolton recently suggested that our country was founded on Christian principles. Was it?

Let us ask ourselves what these Christian principles are. Murder and theft are forbidden? Forgive our neighbor? Those aren’t solely Christian principles. Older cultures have upheld similar laws for millennia.

What about Abrahamic principles? They require a devotion to God and a mandatory following of The Ten Commandments. Our Constitution would decry homosexuality, adultery, polyester, tattoos and more (Levitical Law). It would reinforce slavery and misogyny. Victims of rape would be forced to marry their assailants. It would be a sin to work on the Sabbath.

Are these the biblical values that Pastor Nolton longs for?

What about Christian principles? Following Jesus’ example, we might live in a nation of free health care and generous social programs (Matthew 25:31-46). Divorce would be forbidden (Matthew 19:3). It’s not far-fetched to think that capitalism would be frowned upon (Mark 10:21-25) and that Jesus had no qualms with taxes (Matthew 22:15-22). Though certainly Christian principles, where are these in our Constitution?

The Declaration of Independence mentions our Creator (not a Christian reference). Our original Constitution mentions religion only once, saying that no religious test should be required to hold office. Our amendments further separate church from state.

The Treaty of Tripoli, written by John Adams and signed in 1797, was unanimously agreed-upon by Congress. It reads, “... the United States of America is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion.”

Adams rejected the Trinity and a divine Jesus. Thomas Jefferson took a knife to his Bible and removed Jesus’s miracles, his resurrection and his divinity. Thomas Paine wrote at great lengths in “The Age of Reason” about Christianity, calling it repugnant, contradictory and derogatory to the Almighty. The Framers may have believed in a supreme being, but they were certainly not Christian.

While outspoken Christian leaders are quick to denounce Sharia Law, they are working feverishly to force our nation into the laws of Christianity.

This is not a nation founded upon Christ. Ours was founded upon “We the People.”

David Diskin

(With help from members of the Stockton Area Atheists and Freethinkers)

Lodi

More about

More about

Rules of Conduct

  • 1 Use your real name. You must register with your full first and last name before you can comment. (And don’t pretend you’re someone else.)
  • 2 Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually oriented language.
  • 3 Don’t threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
  • 4 Be truthful. Don't lie about anyone or anything. Don't post unsubstantiated allegations, rumors or gossip that could harm the reputation of a person, company or organization.
  • 5 Be nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
  • 6 Stay on topic. Make sure your comments are about the story. Don’t insult each other.
  • 7 Tell us if the discussion is getting out of hand. Use the ‘Report’ link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
  • 8 Share what you know, and ask about what you don't.
  • 9 Don’t be a troll.
  • 10 Don’t reveal personal information about other commenters. You may reveal your own personal information, but we advise you not to do so.
  • 11 We reserve the right, at our discretion, to monitor, delete or choose not to post any comment. This may include removing or monitoring posts that we believe violate the spirit or letter of these rules, or that we otherwise determine at our discretion needs to be monitored, not posted, or deleted.

Welcome to the discussion.

1 comment:

  • Thomas Heuer posted at 8:51 pm on Tue, Aug 6, 2013.

    nth degree wise Posts: 1401

    Thank you David
    Your letter should put the issue to rest but I.m pretty sure it probably won't.

     

Recent Comments

Posted 6 hours ago by Jien Kaur.

article: Letter: We should not look to governmen…

Mr Mork - do you have a real and true understand of the benefits to avail the unemploy in United States? You comments say a big no. May y…

More...

Posted 7 hours ago by Ed Walters.

article: Semi-truck hauling grapes overturns at …

Big rigs taking off ramps to fast equals ---- what else but an over turned big rig, plus a driver looking for another job. Slow down and a…

More...

Posted 8 hours ago by Kevin Paglia.

article: Letter: Thanks for the discussion on th…

M. I posted this down below but it may be buried in all the since comments. I showed your response on a biker page and the unanimous res…

More...

Posted 8 hours ago by Kevin Paglia.

article: Letter: Thanks for the discussion on th…

I showed your response on a biker page and the unanimous response was that you may have rode a bike, but most assuredly did NOT get it. A …

More...

Posted 9 hours ago by Eric Barrow.

article: Letter: We should not look to governmen…

Thanks Jien you do clear things up in regards to Darrell and his utopian view of the East.

More...

Video

Popular Stories

Poll

Loading…

Your News

News for the community, by the community.

Mailing List

Subscribe to a mailing list to have daily news sent directly to your inbox.

  • Breaking News

    Would you like to receive breaking news alerts? Sign up now!

  • News Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily news headlines? Sign up now!

  • Sports Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily sports headlines? Sign up now!

Manage Your Lists