Lodinews.com

default avatar
Welcome to the site! Login or Signup below.
|
||
Logout|My Dashboard

Where is our common sense?

Print
Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size

Posted: Thursday, August 22, 2013 12:00 am

California is planning on two huge projects. The first is the high-speed rail, and most residents of California don’t see any way in the world for it to ever be profitable, considering we don’t have a huge density of population like Europe and Japan.

The second project is the twin tunnels being planned for the Delta. In that respect, I have a simple question: How can the state provide a constant supply of water to Northern and Southern California when we will have successive years of insufficient rain fall? One obvious answer lies in building more dams and underwater storage to collect the water for use in the lean years.

Of course, accomplishing this will be very expensive and difficult when you consider the “infighting” over the past 20 or 30 years amongst the politicians, Army Corps of Engineers, environmentalists, geologists and various public officials. It can only be done by a strong and intelligent governor and Assembly working together with the public. Unfortunately, this has been absent for years.

The second part of the problem is the growing population throughout the state. There is an infinite abundance of water available in the ocean. Southern California sits right next to it. This can be converted to drinkable water, but will be very expensive. Countries in the Near East have begun to solve this problem irrespective of the cost. Expanding populations will continue to need more water. Northern California can’t continue to supply the entire state.

Take the twin pipe budget to help pay for dams and underwater storage. Give the high speed rail budget to Southern California to help fund the desalting plants. Both projects would generate many jobs, helping the economy and certainly make the labor unions and Assembly members happy.

My question to all of us: Do we really have any realistic alternatives?

Dick Smith

Galt

Rules of Conduct

  • 1 Use your real name. You must register with your full first and last name before you can comment. (And don't pretend you're someone else.)
  • 2 Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually oriented language.
  • 3 Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
  • 4 Be truthful. Don't lie about anyone or anything. Don't post unsubstantiated allegations, rumors or gossip that could harm the reputation of a person, company or organization.
  • 5 Be nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
  • 6 Stay on topic. Make sure your comments are about the story. Don't insult each other.
  • 7 Tell us if the discussion is getting out of hand. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
  • 8 Share what you know, and ask about what you don't.

Welcome to the discussion.

4 comments:

  • Bob Weisenberg posted at 10:51 am on Thu, Aug 22, 2013.

    whtmtns Posts: 4

    One word for an alternative to high speed rail at a much lower cost...Elon Musk's "Hyperloop"

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hyperloop

     
  • Peter Bellville posted at 10:34 am on Thu, Aug 22, 2013.

    gopher Posts: 26

    Desalination is the answer to the states water problems. I am concerned that the tunnels will only create more problems and it is too expensive. I disagree with Brian, we don' need to put high speed rail on the back burner, we need to put it in the trash can.

     
  • Brian Dockter posted at 8:25 am on Thu, Aug 22, 2013.

    Brian Dockter Posts: 2813

    Mr. Smith,

    I am all for desalination on a larger scale. And I am all for high speed rail. High speed rail infrastructure is expensive now. Just imagine how expensive it will be if it's put on the back burner another 30 years. Where's your common sense?

     
  • Walter Chang posted at 7:23 am on Thu, Aug 22, 2013.

    Walt Posts: 1062

    “Do we really have any realistic alternatives?”

    D-i-c-k, you’re still alive and kicking?

    Alright! It's been a long time.

    This is a well written letter too. It's good to see that your cognitive abilities are still intact.

    Now, regarding your query...

    No.

    But we can continue to blog about our displeasure with our politicians.

    Just like the old days.

    Speaking of the old days, how's Chun Mei??


    [smile]

     

Recent Comments

Posted 14 hours ago by Mike Adams.

article: Letter: Obama may be protecting his chi…

"Is CSPAN an "extreme conservative source" or "conspiracy website" Treacy?" So if CSPAN doesn't run any cove…

More...

Posted 14 hours ago by Andrew Liebich.

article: Letter: Obama may be protecting his chi…

Mohammad Elibiary's Twitter page is Mohammad Elibiary's Twitter page. Mohammad Elibiary's Twitter page is not an "unproven conspiracy …

More...

Posted 14 hours ago by Andrew Liebich.

article: Letter: Obama may be protecting his chi…

It was YOU who said Mohammad Elibiary's Twitter page was an "extreme conservative source" or "conspiracy website." It …

More...

Posted 15 hours ago by Christina Welch.

article: Letter: Why is the president ignoring t…

The difference is that we are openly speculating, not offering our thoughts as facts like you do with your nonsense.

More...

Posted 15 hours ago by Christina Welch.

article: Letter: Many states allow guns in schoo…

Mike, I don't think any of us need to look up AB1014. If it's between believing you or Andrew, I'm sure you are the much more reliable so…

More...

Video

Popular Stories

Poll

Loading…

Mailing List

Subscribe to a mailing list to have daily news sent directly to your inbox.

  • Breaking News

    Would you like to receive breaking news alerts? Sign up now!

  • News Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily news headlines? Sign up now!

  • Sports Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily sports headlines? Sign up now!

Manage Your Lists