default avatar
Welcome to the site! Login or Signup below.
Logout|My Dashboard

Lord Blackheath follows the $15 trillion money trail

Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size

Posted: Wednesday, March 21, 2012 12:00 am | Updated: 6:35 am, Wed Mar 21, 2012.

On Feb. 16, in England, Lord James of Blackheath presented to the House of Lords detailed evidence which alleges a theft of $15 trillion out of the U.S. Treasury. Lord Blackheath: "A total of $15 trillion is alleged to have been passed into the hands of HSBC for onward transit to the Royal Bank of Scotland. We need to look to where this came from and the history of this money. I have been trying to sort out the sequence by which this money has been created and where it has come from for a long time."

Lord Blackheath's presentation to the House of Lords is readily available on YouTube.com. It appears that $15 trillion was originally stolen from Yohannes Riyadi of Indonesia. Possibly as a money-laundering scheme, these funds were allegedly used to pay a debt obligation to the British. Interestingly, receipts totaling $15 trillion were allegedly signed even at the Bank of Scotland, but these funds never appeared as a massive transaction in that bank.

Lord Blackheath identifies alarming results of the Federal Reserve in Washington's 2010 audit of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, showing evidence that "a vast profit is being made on this money somewhere."

It was reported that on Feb. 29, Lord James of Blackheath was murdered. However, the House of Lords website does not confirm his death. Truth is that somebody released this report; and if it is incorrect, to impeach the journalists who would report his death.

Daniel Hutchins


Rules of Conduct

  • 1 Use your real name. You must register with your full first and last name before you can comment. (And don’t pretend you’re someone else.)
  • 2 Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually oriented language.
  • 3 Don’t threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
  • 4 Be truthful. Don't lie about anyone or anything. Don't post unsubstantiated allegations, rumors or gossip that could harm the reputation of a person, company or organization.
  • 5 Be nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
  • 6 Stay on topic. Make sure your comments are about the story. Don’t insult each other.
  • 7 Tell us if the discussion is getting out of hand. Use the ‘Report’ link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
  • 8 Share what you know, and ask about what you don't.
  • 9 Don’t be a troll.
  • 10 Don’t reveal personal information about other commenters. You may reveal your own personal information, but we advise you not to do so.
  • 11 We reserve the right, at our discretion, to monitor, delete or choose not to post any comment. This may include removing or monitoring posts that we believe violate the spirit or letter of these rules, or that we otherwise determine at our discretion needs to be monitored, not posted, or deleted.

Welcome to the discussion.


  • Darrell Baumbach posted at 8:45 pm on Thu, Mar 29, 2012.

    Darrell Baumbach Posts: 9405

    Mr schmidt stated...I think Andrew has taken so of Daniel's head shots that he is delirious.

    There he goes again, claiming that he is thinking... everyone knows you are simply attempting ridicule... why the fake thinking claim Steve?

  • Andrew Liebich posted at 2:41 pm on Thu, Mar 29, 2012.

    Andrew Liebich Posts: 2999

    I have asked the same question 10 times! Are you ever going to answer it? ROFLMAO

  • daniel hutchins posted at 10:30 pm on Mon, Mar 26, 2012.

    daniel hutchins Posts: 1342

    Andrew: I don't think Foundation X is going to rescue England, unless there is a complete collapse of the CITY OF LONDON CORPORATION, and elimination or arrest of the people who own and control it.

    If it does collapse, then maybe so.

  • daniel hutchins posted at 10:27 pm on Mon, Mar 26, 2012.

    daniel hutchins Posts: 1342

    Mike, Steve,

    Also watch for some exciting changes in world currency to occur. I expect a complete restructuring of world currency exchange, and this is linked to the elimination of the cabal from their long-standing reign of power.

    Finally, you might be surprised when see some of the resignations as they should hit very close to home.

    Enjoy the entertainment.

  • daniel hutchins posted at 10:24 pm on Mon, Mar 26, 2012.

    daniel hutchins Posts: 1342

    Mike, Steve,

    It is now a possibility that the cabal has fed disinformation to Benjamin Fulford and also to Lord Blackheath to cause them to take the bait and publish incorrect information. In my letter, I mentioned Blackheath's alleged death. That is an example.

  • daniel hutchins posted at 10:22 pm on Mon, Mar 26, 2012.

    daniel hutchins Posts: 1342

    Mike, Steve:

    If you want entertainment, you can google search "Benjamin Fulford 200 arrests." This is hot news, and I think it is real. Fulford and his friends are using words like "take-down" to refer to arrests, and potential lynching of elite class bankers who have been pillaging the Western Hemisphere for too long, and the Chinese have long tolerated this attach on the world's people beyond their threshold of patience.

    Fulford claims that 450 world bankers have now resigned from their positions, while they are maintaining a running list of news reports on each resignation or retirement. They also claim that 200 arrests occurred just in the last week, but the news media doesn't cover the arrest of their own people.

  • daniel hutchins posted at 10:14 pm on Mon, Mar 26, 2012.

    daniel hutchins Posts: 1342

    Andrew: You are off-topic. I suggest you focus your energy on learning whether Blackheath's report on $15 Trillion is indeed correct.

    I'm going on record as having my own suspicions, even though I was the author of this letter.

  • daniel hutchins posted at 10:12 pm on Mon, Mar 26, 2012.

    daniel hutchins Posts: 1342

    Andrew: Nevertheless, you seem to think that I know who is Foundation X, just because I wrote a letter about Blackheath's report to the House of Lords, on a separate, unrelated topic.

    Still, I insist that whoever is Foundation X, wisdom would dictate not to divulge their identity if I knew who they were. Similararly, Blackheath didn't care to divulge their identity, although he probably knows full well who they are.

  • Steve Schmidt posted at 1:25 pm on Mon, Mar 26, 2012.

    Steve Schmidt Posts: 2672

    I think Andrew has taken so of Daniel's head shots that he is delirious.

  • Andrew Liebich posted at 10:57 am on Mon, Mar 26, 2012.

    Andrew Liebich Posts: 2999

    Daniel, I don't believe you do understand the question. Lord Blackheath stated that Foundation X was bailing out Britian. I am unaware of any connection Foundation X has to your "reinhabited republic". I simply want to know who you think Foundation X is. How many times must I ask the same question?

  • Mike Adams posted at 10:50 am on Mon, Mar 26, 2012.

    Mike Adams Posts: 1560

    Once again, I don't have to take orders from lower mamalian life forms.

    As to Daniel's letter, it is well written, understandable and most importantly, a work he completed himself, unlike the typical submission by a small ground dwelling animal.

    If I choose to read it and comment on it, then I will. If I choose not to, then I won't I'm not under any obligation to you, weasel.

    If you hadn't attempted to slam me earlier on this, I never would have responded, but you can't let pets determine what rules they'll abide by.

  • Andrew Liebich posted at 10:45 am on Mon, Mar 26, 2012.

    Andrew Liebich Posts: 2999

    Mr. Schmidt, Again, I have merely asked one question. Your posts are absurd! Yo Adrian!

  • daniel hutchins posted at 10:44 am on Mon, Mar 26, 2012.

    daniel hutchins Posts: 1342


    First you type ROFLMAO, and maybe LOL.

    Then you ask me a question which is confidential and sensitive, and you want an answer.

    What's up with this?

  • daniel hutchins posted at 10:42 am on Mon, Mar 26, 2012.

    daniel hutchins Posts: 1342


    I now believe that I understand your question. You are simply asking for the identity of the organization which is funding the new republic, and you believe this is Foundation X.

    You should know that you are not going to get an answer to a question of such a huge amount of funding.

    President Turner disclosed on a public radio broadcast that 6 million metric tons of gold were pledged to the republic. The president would not disclose their identity.

    If you had a stash of 100 pounds of gold in your private home, you wouldn’t like it if people started to give out your name and address.

  • Steve Schmidt posted at 7:18 am on Mon, Mar 26, 2012.

    Steve Schmidt Posts: 2672

    Darrell is absolutely right. I am certainly not a player in this particular game in any way, shape or form. Far from it.

    My position is more akin to that of a season ticket holder, settled back in his comfortable seat enjoying the spectacle of a skilled master like Mr Hutchins showing Andrew up for the rank amateur that he is.

    Bravo Mr Hutchins! Bravo!

  • Mike Adams posted at 6:50 am on Mon, Mar 26, 2012.

    Mike Adams Posts: 1560

    I don't have to take directions from a lower level mammal, especially from the weasel group. And you merely reinforce your title with your continued claim that you were speaking of a specific un document. "Any" means "any". Look it up. It says nothing about a particular document. Any document is any document. You should maybe take a breath. Or don't take a breath. See if you can hold your breath for 10 minutes and I'll stop bugging you.

    Daniel, you've seen the level of comprehension exhibited by the weasel. He is outclassed by all of us when forced to use something that comes out of his sick, derranged mind. You on the other hand (although I don't agree what you say is true) are clearly capable of writing lucid, informing posts without resorting to just using copy and paste. You probably noticed weasel's level of writing has dropped since you became aware of his copy and paste.

    This is probably a result of the government spraying us using the vapor trails of jets flying in much colder air aloft. I do like that on weasel's website that they even show a water tanker (for fires) dumping water and claim that the thousands of gallons dropped are "a vapor trail".

    This might interest you. (Weasel stay out of it until I say otherwise). A week ago Sunday (or last Sunday W) I veiwed a KC 10 flying into Travis AFB. It looked odd. So I got my little binocculors out and saw that it's tail boom was still extended. A fluid was comming out of it which I assume was fuel. Were they bleeding off excess weight because they were too heavy to land? Wouldn't the tail boom return to it's normal position so they were emptying their fuel bladder in case of sparks? I don't know. I do know they weren't making vapor trails.

  • Darrell Baumbach posted at 10:01 pm on Sun, Mar 25, 2012.

    Darrell Baumbach Posts: 9405

    Andrew stated...perhaps you should take a seat on the bench with Mr. Schmidt.

    I have to disagree with Andrew on this one. I contend that Mr Schmidt was never in the game where he would have the option to take the bench. No... he with beer in hand, yells from the sideline ( burp) and is only on the thread to make fun of Daniel.

    Andrew on the ther hand, is making points that have not been refuted... Will be interesting to see the final ending to this interesting topic.

  • daniel hutchins posted at 7:16 pm on Sun, Mar 25, 2012.

    daniel hutchins Posts: 1342

    The website identified me as spam. The website links will only work if you edit them to delete the spaces.

    The white hat reports at http://tdarkcabal.blogspot .com/ is reporting on the prior post.

    Then, we had Blackheath in the House of Lords. He was reported to have been murdered, but no confirmation yet. I have not seen confirmation that he is alive, however.

    If you want to know about Benjamin Fulford, start with the Youtube. He has some Japanese cultural background and speaks fluent Japanese. In one of the videos, he warns of the Japanese "earthquake" set by a nuclear warhead which was allegedly planted on the bottom of the ocean with drilling equipment. Apparently, since he was speaking in the future tense, this video must have been recorded before the Japanese event. I have viewed the evidence at the nuclear facilities. It looks to me like it was a 2nd nuke. You'll have to do some looking for that yourselves.

    In regards to Benjamin Fulford, you can also look at the links below.

    http://benjaminfulford.typepad .com/benjaminfulford/
    http://americankabuki.blogspot .com/
    http://tdarkcabal.blogspot .com/
    http://the2012scenario .com/2012/03/update-now-177-resignations-from-world-banks-investment-houses-and-money-funds/

  • daniel hutchins posted at 7:13 pm on Sun, Mar 25, 2012.

    daniel hutchins Posts: 1342

    Mike, Andrew,

    There is a war going on. Below, Andrew's reference to the White Dragon Society refers to a society which claims to be hunting down world elite bankers who conduct themselves as pirates in international commerce, stealing quite illegally, without regard for loss of life. This is why you see some reports that thousands of arrest warrants are being served, and at the same time, the count of publicized banker resignations is only at 358.

    [This post is chopped because the website is flagging me as spam.]

  • Mike Adams posted at 5:51 pm on Sun, Mar 25, 2012.

    Mike Adams Posts: 1560

    Steve let's look at the evidence that weasels always lose:

    How weaseldom began:
    "Andrew Liebich posted at 8:40 am on Sat, Feb 18, 2012.
    Do elected officials not take an oath to preserve, protect and defend the Constitution against all enemies both foreign and domestic? I believe they do. I challenge anyone to pick up any United Nations document and find the word FREEDOM."

    Mike Adams posted at 9:32 am on Sat, Feb 18, 2012.
    "Further evidenced that angrou is being handled. When he goes off script he makes big mistakes such as the following:

    To Kevin P this morning:
    "I challenge anyone to pick up any United Nations document and find the word FREEDOM.

    From the United Nations Charter (about 10 minutes ago) (READ THE LAST LINE)

    * to save succeeding generations from the scourge of war, which twice in our lifetime has brought untold sorrow to mankind, and
    * to reaffirm faith in fundamental human rights, in the dignity and worth of the human person, in the equal rights of men and women and of nations large and small, and
    * to establish conditions under which justice and respect for the obligations arising from treaties and other sources of international law can be maintained, and
    * to promote social progress and better standards of life in larger freedom,"

    " Andrew Liebich posted at 9:30 am on Mon, Feb 20, 2012.
    Duh! I was referring to Agenda 21 Moron Mike. Nice try. "

    Well maybe he was referring to a different "United Nations"

  • Steve Schmidt posted at 4:16 pm on Sun, Mar 25, 2012.

    Steve Schmidt Posts: 2672

    Andrew wrote:"I'm in complete agreement with Daniel. "

    Chuckle.... and Daniel's victory is complete.

    Well done, Mr Hutchins!

  • daniel hutchins posted at 3:37 pm on Sun, Mar 25, 2012.

    daniel hutchins Posts: 1342


    "Please take my lack of ignorance into consideration as you need not address me with such hostility."

    No hostility intended.

  • daniel hutchins posted at 3:34 pm on Sun, Mar 25, 2012.

    daniel hutchins Posts: 1342


    You wrote,”Lastly, the fact of the matter is...Absent a FULL AUDIT of the Federal Reserve...everything else is idle chatter.”

    Did you write this fine writing style all by yourself?

    Obviously you are following Ron Paul. Although the people have not been notified of the activities being conducted by the Federal Reserve, Blackheath is not as ignorant as the U.S. Citizens, and he knows what is going on.

    If he were referring to the GAO, he would have said so. He was referring to the Fed, which is not federal.

  • daniel hutchins posted at 3:30 pm on Sun, Mar 25, 2012.

    daniel hutchins Posts: 1342


    You wrote, “Do you ascribe to the 'White Dragon Society', Illuminati, etc etc.?”

    From http://www.thefreedictionary.com/ascribe:

    transitive verb
    1. To attribute to a specified cause, source, or origin: "Other people ascribe his exclusion from the canon to an unsubtle form of racism" (Daniel Pinchbeck). See Synonyms at attribute.
    2. To assign as a quality or characteristic: was quick to ascribe jealousy to her critics.

    The verb requires that the object be attributed to the subject.

    I can only guess what you are trying to ask.

  • Steve Schmidt posted at 2:23 pm on Sun, Mar 25, 2012.

    Steve Schmidt Posts: 2672

    Mike, personally, I am just content to sit back and watch Daniel mop the floor with Andrew. Andrew is getting his well deserved comeuppance.

  • Mike Adams posted at 1:40 pm on Sun, Mar 25, 2012.

    Mike Adams Posts: 1560

    The weasel gets upset if someone challenges him, hence his oft used titles of "moron" or "idiot" when someone who is more intelligent and capable questions his usually weak posts. He is an angry man with no opportunity for a brighter future so he is left here to try and bully us like this is a school yard. The thing about bullies is that they usually lose both the fight and the respect they thought they earned. You usually then find them alone. In the weasel's case, at his kitchen table, checking every last web site of the government looking for signs that the government is putting thought control chemicals in vapor trails. While he appears to read a lot of stuff, his lack of comprehension forces him to just copy and paste. As you've seen, when forced to provide his own input, he sounds like somebody with an 8th grade education.

    As you'll see, he'll be soon applying some moniker to you also, like "dumb" daniel or something similar. He chooses short words he can spell.

    For the record, I have no idea who Benjamin Fulford is. I have no intention of looking it up. I don't care who he is. My finding out will not change the fact that weasel is a poor loser and even a poor winner I suspect. I don't know, I've never seen him win at something, and I doubt I ever will.

  • daniel hutchins posted at 11:50 pm on Sat, Mar 24, 2012.

    daniel hutchins Posts: 1342

    As for the identity of Foundation X, I think we should have patience to wait and see. I do agree, however, that it is important. I also think we are going to learn very soon who these people are.

    I will say that the world currency exchange values are changing at this present time, and there were allegedly some security breaches in the system. This was a huge matter. There are allegedly thousands of arrest warrants, and people of lesser significance are being allowed to resign in lieu of arrest.

  • daniel hutchins posted at 11:41 pm on Sat, Mar 24, 2012.

    daniel hutchins Posts: 1342


    WRONG ONE MORE TIME. Foundation X was not the topic of my letter.

    2 years ago, Foundation X was Lord Blackheath's topic, in a separate matter, which he presented to House of Lords on January 10, 2010.

    My letter pertained to his presentation on February 16, 2012, as I stated in the letter.

  • Steve Schmidt posted at 9:08 am on Sat, Mar 24, 2012.

    Steve Schmidt Posts: 2672

    Andrew, Daniel is wiping the floor with you.

  • Andrew Liebich posted at 8:02 am on Sat, Mar 24, 2012.

    Andrew Liebich Posts: 2999

    Mr. Schmidt,
    I merely asked one question. The question is relevant to Daniel's letter. The question has yet to be answered by either yourself or Daniel.

    If you honestly believe you are "watching Daniel demolish Andrew's arguments" you are "astoundingly delusional" as well as "amazingly ignorant."

  • Steve Schmidt posted at 7:04 am on Sat, Mar 24, 2012.

    Steve Schmidt Posts: 2672

    Should read "Andrew's David doesn't have a sling"

  • Steve Schmidt posted at 4:59 am on Sat, Mar 24, 2012.

    Steve Schmidt Posts: 2672

    Sitting here watching Daniel demolish Andrew's arguments is entertainment in and of itself. Its sort of like David and Goliath but, in this case, Andrew's Goliath doesn't have a sling.

  • Darrell Baumbach posted at 1:35 am on Sat, Mar 24, 2012.

    Darrell Baumbach Posts: 9405

    Steve stated...Andy, if you would also like to use my hankie, please feel free...

    Considering what you wipe with your hankie Steve, it was not an act of kindness to make such a an offer.

    Im still waiting for you to answer Andrew's questions Steve. Of course you might have too educate yourself first. You seem to avaid any specifics and simply discount the merit of the question itself... A bit lazy of you id say.

  • Andrew Liebich posted at 9:45 pm on Fri, Mar 23, 2012.

    Andrew Liebich Posts: 2999

    Good grief! I said nothing about the amount of US Dollars in circulation.

    Lord James of Blackheath spoke of Foundation X. You wrote a letter to the editor about Lord James of Blackheath. Why are you so dumbfounded by the fact that I'm interested in who you believe Foundation X to be?

  • daniel hutchins posted at 9:17 pm on Fri, Mar 23, 2012.

    daniel hutchins Posts: 1342

    Whatever is Foundation X, the republic has nothing to do with it.

  • daniel hutchins posted at 9:16 pm on Fri, Mar 23, 2012.

    daniel hutchins Posts: 1342

    Andrew: It was $15 Trillion, just this time.

    Your analysis of the amount of US Dollars in circulation was quite misinformed.

    Problem is that you attempted to use your own analysis to calculate something that is very big.

    There are probably a quadrillion US Dollars in print and in circulation in the entire world.

  • daniel hutchins posted at 9:10 pm on Fri, Mar 23, 2012.

    daniel hutchins Posts: 1342


    WRONG AGAIN! You did not ask me who is Foundation X. I asked you it was.

    You need a more sophisticated methodology. You reinforced your reputation which isn't very good right now.

    You wrote,
    just curious... At what point in time will our "reinhabited republic" provide more information concerning Foundation X?

  • Andrew Liebich posted at 8:08 pm on Fri, Mar 23, 2012.

    Andrew Liebich Posts: 2999

    Mr. Schmidt,
    F.Y.I. 192 nations have signed a UN Treaty that places a moratorium on SAG programs. This UN document addressing what you refer to as "conspiracy theory" can hardly be "taken out of context". You are an "amazingly ignorant" individual.

    As far as the topic of this thread... I'll ask you the same question I asked Daniel.
    Who is Foundation X?

  • Steve Schmidt posted at 7:34 pm on Fri, Mar 23, 2012.

    Steve Schmidt Posts: 2672

    Andy, if you would also like to use my hankie, please feel free.

    As for your conspiracy theory of the week, frankly, it appears to be one part facts taken out of context, one part manufactured evidence and one part pathological delusion. While you are right that it certainly has no bearing on the facts at hand here (or anywhere else for that matter) it is relevant to this letter in so much as it completely discredits any further statements you might make.

  • Andrew Liebich posted at 6:28 pm on Fri, Mar 23, 2012.

    Andrew Liebich Posts: 2999

    As far as Mr. Schmidt's most recent idiotic post (having nothing to do with the topic of Daniel's letter I might add)...

    Is Ken Caldeira, a leading climate scientist based at the Carnegie Institution at Stanford not promoting the idea of injecting the atmosphere with aerosols Mr. Schmidt? Are scientists at the U.S. Department of Energy’s Savannah River National Laboratory in Aiken, S.C., not conducting tests and developing computer models of what might happen if a huge amount of particulate matter is shot into the stratosphere Mr. Schmidt? Did TIME magazine not suggest that geo-engineering the planet may be the only way forward Mr.Schmidt?

    How do you justify your willfull ignorance concerning Stratospheric Aerosol Geo-Engineering programs considering the fact that they are vehemently backed by your beloved President Obama's Science Czar John P. Holdren?

    As you recently stated to Brian Dockter, "the idea that your contributions here are either "respectable" or "decent" can only be taken as evidence that you are either astoundingly delusional or amazingly ignorant."

    Which are you Mr. Schmidt?

  • Andrew Liebich posted at 6:15 pm on Fri, Mar 23, 2012.

    Andrew Liebich Posts: 2999

    I merely asked one simple question, "At what point in time will our "reinhabited republic" provide more information concerning Foundation X?"

    Your bizarre response,
    1) "What is Foundation X? Is this a source of funding?"
    2) "To whom are you asking that the reinhabited republic would provide more information regarding Foundation X?"

    1) Seriously Daniel? Lord James of Blackheath discusses Foundation X and you feign ignorance?
    2.) I addressed the question to you. It's your letter to the editor.

    Are you unwilling or unable to answer my question?

    To place Daniel's $15 trillion into perspective, which was actually $16 trillion I might add, remember that GDP of the United States is only $14.12 trillion. The entire national debt of the United States government spanning its 200+ year history is "only" $14.5 trillion. The budget that is being debated so heavily in Congress and the Senate is "only" $3.5 trillion. Take all of the outrage and debate over the $1.5 trillion deficit into consideration, and swallow this Red pill: There was no debate about whether $16,000,000,000,000 would be given to failing banks and failing corporations around the world!

    In late 2008, the TARP Bailout bill was passed and loans of $800 billion were given to failing banks and companies. That was a blatant lie considering the fact that Goldman Sachs alone received $814 billion dollars. As is turns out, the Federal Reserve donated $2.5 trillion to Citigroup, while Morgan Stanley received $2.04 trillion. The Royal Bank of Scotland and Deutsche Bank, a German bank, split about a trillion and numerous other banks received hefty chunks of the $16 trillion.

    Americans should be outraged at the abysmal state of affairs when an unelected group of bankers can create money out of thin air and give it out to megabanks and supercorporations like Halloween candy. The list of institutions that received the money from the Federal Reserve can be found on page 131 of the GAO Audit. http://www.scribd.com/doc/60553686/GAO-Fed-Investigation

  • daniel hutchins posted at 10:33 pm on Thu, Mar 22, 2012.

    daniel hutchins Posts: 1342

    I can see why you are so sharply criticized in these comment columns.
    I agree with the criticism that I have observed.

  • daniel hutchins posted at 10:29 pm on Thu, Mar 22, 2012.

    daniel hutchins Posts: 1342

    Mike Adams,
    You are right, both philosophically, and realistically. In the list below, I consider these unfortunate events to be temporary, and they occurrence of these events cannot persist in a corporation whose bank is in a state of collapse, when a new bank comes to town.

    If you try to learn about us, inevitably, you will be offered several gimmicks by various people, and you can get into nothing but trouble if you follow such gimmicks. This is exactly the case with the IRS 4 years ago, and what seemed to make sense for a lot of people who tried such gimmicks, were assuredly attacked by the IRS shortly following. Literally, people got massive tax refund checks from the IRS, and I have seen a few of them. When these were cashed, the IRS insisted that they weren't supposed to cash them. Then the IRS demanded a return of the amount of the check which was cashed, plus interest.

    I once attended a seminar that was conducted by someone who I am now certain was an agent for one of our former vice presidents, and once again, they were just gathering up names and assembling them into a database. I bailed out, and let other people try it to tell me if it would work or not. I abandoned one friend who made such a commitment to follow this bait.

    Another one of my former friends, and his son are both dead, and someone in here was making fun of me for this, and that person might have been you. These two friends were openly teaching some legal technology which was very much of a threat to the banking system for exposing banking fraud. it now appears that the dash cams were manipulated with a video editing program. In the Youtube, I have seen proof that the videos were staged as a theatre.

    Another person whom I never met, but heard on telephone conferences, took the legal system for a $75,000 ride for a$115 traffic ticket. (He went to jail for this one, for 7 days.) He explained the error he committed when he realized that his court proceeding was not on the record, at which time he realized that he was screwed, and he went to jail.

    Another time, this same person beat a traffic ticket, in court, with a series of objections, and the traffic cop was dumbfounded when the citation was thrown out of court. This law-enforcing cop went to his house to ask how he was beaten in court, and when an argument ensued, there are two stories which happened next:
    Story A, according to the cop: the assailant attempted to steal a weapon from the cop's belt.
    Story B, according to a story I was told by someone who knew him: the victim tried to escape in his car. The police officer battled for control of the automobile door, while the victim tried to shut it. The door handle broke off, and the door handle was held in the victim's hand while victorious cop forced open the door.
    Final result: the cop shot him dead.

    Moral of the story: don't forget that the cop has a gun. Wisdom dictates. Maybe best to say yes to the cop for everything he says, and then go see him in court again.

    However, one of my friends states that through the use of wisdom, he has managed to stay out of jail, except for a few overnight visits. Best to use wisdom wherever possible.

  • Steve Schmidt posted at 1:09 pm on Thu, Mar 22, 2012.

    Steve Schmidt Posts: 2672

    Andrew, at what point will the space aliens provide us more information about your contrails and how they relate to the Second Coming of Elvis?

  • daniel hutchins posted at 8:50 am on Thu, Mar 22, 2012.

    daniel hutchins Posts: 1342


    1) What is Foundation X? Is this a source of funding?
    2) To whom are you asking that the reinhabited republic would provide more information regarding Foundation X?

    I congratulate you for asking a question using your own thought, and without using a cut and paste where you ask people to go read what you pasted and find what you are laughing about.

  • Andrew Liebich posted at 12:47 am on Thu, Mar 22, 2012.

    Andrew Liebich Posts: 2999

    just curious... At what point in time will our "reinhabited republic" provide more information concerning Foundation X?

  • daniel hutchins posted at 7:35 pm on Wed, Mar 21, 2012.

    daniel hutchins Posts: 1342

    Mike Adams,

    The IRS receives jurisdiction when people give it to them. People people voluntarily give them jurisdiction when they sign Form W-2 and/or a Form 1040. Only federal employees are obligated to sign these terms; and, the term "employee" has a specific definition. I suggest you do not rely upon your Webster's dictionary for the true legal definition under color of law.

    Additionally, you are taxed for the benefit-privilege of using U.S. Dollars to engage in trade. In the future, I do not intend to accept this benefit privilege if I can get out of it. The republic which you have studied, will have a separate source of funding, and it will not contract with the IRS to generate a single dime of revenue; and, they will have nothing to do whatsoever with the Federal Reserve.

    Additionally, if you deposit U.S. Dollars into a bank account for which you have signed, “Yes! I am a U.S. person.” What little do people realize that the money they deposit becomes the property of the U.S. This goes also for the contents of the safe deposit box. When the government executes a levy upon your bank account, they do not need permission because they are merely making a withdraw from their own bank account.

    If you look at the forms that you sign, you might notice that people give themselves the title “taxpayer” when they sign. On Form 1040, you certify under penalty of perjury that you have “income.” These are contractual and statutory terms which you accept and agree upon when you sign.

    I suggest you take a look at form W-8BEN.

  • daniel hutchins posted at 6:58 pm on Wed, Mar 21, 2012.

    daniel hutchins Posts: 1342

    Steve Schmidt, Thank you very much!

    I definitely spent some time in preparing this letter, and initially, I also believed the story about Blackheath's alleged death.

    That was quite an annoying distraction.

  • Steve Schmidt posted at 4:56 pm on Wed, Mar 21, 2012.

    Steve Schmidt Posts: 2672

    Great letter Daniel!

  • Mike Adams posted at 10:57 am on Wed, Mar 21, 2012.

    Mike Adams Posts: 1560

    After reading weasels copy and paste diatribes, it is refreshing to read something authored by the person submitting it. Although in the past I have made fun of you and your beliefs, your recent reply to my post shows you are dedicated to the movement of which you've affilitated yourself with. It was informative. I think you're going to be in big trouble with the IRS down the road sometime, and that is sad to see.

  • daniel hutchins posted at 8:38 am on Wed, Mar 21, 2012.

    daniel hutchins Posts: 1342

    This matter is of such importance that an allegation of Lord Blackheath's death was leaked to a reporter, and for a period of time, I actually believed that he was dead.

  • daniel hutchins posted at 8:37 am on Wed, Mar 21, 2012.

    daniel hutchins Posts: 1342

    In 250 words, impossible to illustrate the complexities. As the letter is written, the money appears to have been stolen from Yohannes Riyadi, but Mr. Riyadi denies the authenticity of the alleged transaction which involves him.

    So now, the source of the funding denies the authenticity of the alleged transaction, and the British claim that they never received a payment.

    For certain, wherever the source of funding, they were made to appear as a legitimate payment of a US loan obligation to the British.


Recent Comments

Posted 8 hours ago by Eric Barrow.

article: Letter: Ron Portal’s letters repeat the…

Ed the US economy is currently the strongest economy in the world. Do you wonder why you still need to play it down or is it that you are j…


Posted 11 hours ago by Shane Marcus.

article: Letter: I enjoy ‘Words to Live By’ in t…

Its not the sin that is in the world, but the sin that is in everyone of us.


Posted 11 hours ago by Mike Adams.

article: Steve Hansen: Driving through the gaunt…

Traffic laws are not much of a deterrent since ticketing rarely occurs. Sure, those who get ticketed think it's a deterrent, but that war…


Posted Yesterday by Steve Schmidt.

article: Steve Hansen: Driving through the gaunt…

I would suggest suicide as a reasonable alternative to a trip to Phoenix. There are worse things than death and that flea pit is one of th…


Posted Yesterday by Steve Schmidt.

article: Steve Hansen: Driving through the gaunt…

Yup Brian. That would be never. I am a gun owner and a vocal supporter of the Second Amendment both here (on numerous threads) and in rea…



Popular Stories



Your News

News for the community, by the community.

Mailing List

Subscribe to a mailing list to have daily news sent directly to your inbox.

  • Breaking News

    Would you like to receive breaking news alerts? Sign up now!

  • News Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily news headlines? Sign up now!

  • Sports Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily sports headlines? Sign up now!

Manage Your Lists