President Obama’s agenda is to destroy the Constitution
-
Print
-
Create a hardcopy of this page
-
Font Size:
-
Default font size
-
Larger font size
Posted: Tuesday, January 22, 2013 12:00 am
President Obama’s agenda is to destroy the Constitution
On Jan. 16, Obama signed 23 presidential orders into law that attack law-abiding citizens, basically telling us that if he can save one child, all these laws will be worth it. And of course he had several children about him to bring home the message.
When Hitler signed into law his gun control measures using this same excuse, he also had children about him looking up at him adoringly. Gun control "for the children" — nothing to do with controlling the population, of course.
It's been stated that if we adhered to the laws on gun control already on the books, we wouldn't need to add more. But let us think for a moment — the government can't even stop murder, rape and crime inside their prisons, where they have complete control over every individual's life.
The assumption that this godlike figure of Obama can pass laws by himself without the consent of Congress and all will be made right is fantasy.
We are watching history repeat itself. Cicero, who lived during Caesar's reign, wrote that "governments use national emergencies to destroy liberty," and with this guy we have emergencies every day which give him his excuse to attack the one thing that made this nation the greatest nation on earth — the Constitution of the United States.
Obama has an agenda to "fundamentally transform America" (his words). He may use props of women, children, etc. as his reasons for doing whatever, but his real goal is to destroy the one document that keeps him and others who share his beliefs from having total control over the people, and that's the Constitution of the United States.
Ron Portal
Lodi
Posted in
Letters
on
Tuesday, January 22, 2013 12:00 am.
(%remaining%) Remaining
Thanks for visiting Lodinews.com. You're entitled to view 20 free articles every 30 days. You will see 10 articles for free before being asked to register, and then you can view 10 additional articles by registering or logging in. Then, if you enjoy our site and want full access, we'll ask you to purchase an affordable subscription.
(%remaining%) Remaining
Thanks for visiting Lodinews.com. You're entitled to view 20 free articles every 30 days, and you currently have (%remaining%) free articles remaining ((%remaining_reg%) before being asked to register and (%remaining_sub%) before being asked to subscribe). Then, if you enjoy our site and want full access, we'll ask you to purchase an affordable subscription.
(%remaining%) Remaining
Thanks for visiting Lodinews.com. You're entitled to view 20 free articles every 30 days, and you currently have (%remaining%) free articles remaining ((%remaining_reg%) before being asked to register and (%remaining_sub%) before being asked to subscribe). Then, if you enjoy our site and want full access, we'll ask you to purchase an affordable subscription.
(%remaining%) Remaining
Thanks for visiting Lodinews.com. You're entitled to view 20 free articles every 30 days, and you currently have (%remaining%) total free articles remaining ((%remaining_reg%) before being asked to register and (%remaining_sub%) before being asked to subscribe). Then, if you enjoy our site and want full access, we'll ask you to purchase an affordable subscription.
(%remaining%) Remaining
Thank you for reading Lodinews.com. You have viewed (%viewed%) of your 20 free pages in 30 days. Please login or register at this time and enjoy the next (%remaining%) articles free of charge. After your 20 free articles, we'll ask you to purchase an affordable subscription.
(%remaining%) Remaining
Thank you for reading Lodinews.com. Because you have already viewed this article, you may view it again as many times as you would like without subtracting from your remaining free article views.
(%remaining%) Remaining
Thank you for registering on Lodinews.com. You're entitled to view 20 articles for free every 30 days, and you currently have (%remaining%) remaining. Then, if you enjoy our site and want full access, we'll ask you to purchase an affordable subscription.
(%remaining%) Remaining
Thank you for reading Lodinews.com. You're entitled to view 20 articles for free every 30 days, and you currently have (%remaining%) remaining. Then, if you enjoy our site and want full access, we'll ask you to purchase an affordable subscription.
(%remaining%) Remaining
Thank you for reading Lodinews.com. You're entitled to view 20 articles for free every 30 days, and you currently have (%remaining%) remaining. Then, if you enjoy our site and want full access, we'll ask you to purchase an affordable subscription.
(%remaining%) Remaining
Thank you for reading Lodinews.com. You're entitled to view 20 articles for free every 30 days. This is your last free article this period. On your next article we'll ask you to purchase an affordable subscription.
(%remaining%) Remaining
Thank you for reading 20 free articles on our site. You can come back at the end of your 30-day period for another 20 free articles, or you can purchase a subscription at this time and continue to enjoy valuable local news and information. If you need help, please contact our office at 209-369-2761.
dave howard posted at 8:13 pm on Sun, Jan 27, 2013.
people need to keep there guns so we don't have a kent state or a
wounded knee again.
Andrew Liebich posted at 12:19 am on Thu, Jan 24, 2013.
Next, Ms. Bobin will call CNN a "Right Wing Conspiracy Theory" website. [lol]
Thomas Heuer posted at 12:16 pm on Wed, Jan 23, 2013.
Andrew are you developing a sense of humor?
Jerome Kinderman posted at 9:07 am on Wed, Jan 23, 2013.
Actually, there were many (and I mean MANY) people who didn't realize that there was an amendment in Obamacare that prohibits collecting this information. Curiously, it was Harry Reid who inserted it into the bill before it became law. (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XMAU0kETZaE)
While I also did not realize such a provision was contained in Obama's terrible healthcare law, my response to the issue wasn't necessarily based upon my belief that such a thing didn't exist, but that it was simply part of the discourse on this particular forum. Am I surprised that it was buried in the law? Sure. But let's remember that only recently has the Obama administration been so interested in chipping away at the Second Amendment, something very distasteful to freedom-loving Americans.
Andrew Liebich posted at 1:27 am on Wed, Jan 23, 2013.
Those who live in reality know that only Congress makes laws. [sleeping]
Andrew Liebich posted at 1:14 am on Wed, Jan 23, 2013.
An ignorant individual may not know who re-newed the Patriot Act or who updated the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act to grant telecommunication companies immunity from lawsuits...
[sleeping]
Andrew Liebich posted at 12:54 am on Wed, Jan 23, 2013.
One of President Obama's 23 executive orders DOES transform doctors into snitches and Obamacare DOES have an ammendment that prohibits the same.
I can understand your confusion.
Walter Chang posted at 5:55 pm on Tue, Jan 22, 2013.
"angry"
What's up Pat??
[beam]
Patrick W Maple posted at 5:41 pm on Tue, Jan 22, 2013.
From a woman who thinks a dead cop, soldier or sheriff is just "collateral damage":
"I suppose that you would also take offense that doctors and teachers (along with others) are required to report abuse or suspected abuse, either on a child or a parent. Google it. But I doubt you will find a youtube film, so if you have to read it, most likely you'll have trouble understanding."
Walter Chang posted at 5:39 pm on Tue, Jan 22, 2013.
"fantasy"
Hey folks...
Tonight's Double Jeopardy answer is...
Ancient Rome, Germany 1938 and the clinically depressed.
[wink]
Thomas Heuer posted at 4:58 pm on Tue, Jan 22, 2013.
Thank you Andrew. Yes I was completely oblivious. But maybe you should understand some of my confusion comes from your 7:54 AM post where you said "As part of Obama’s 23 executive orders, doctors will be transformed into gun control snitches who are ordered by Obama to ask patients about guns they might have at home." Then MR kinderman responded "I just hope that anyone asked about their guns will simply tell their physicians it's none of their business - because it isn't." So it seems it was not simply my misunderstanding.
Thomas Heuer posted at 2:04 pm on Tue, Jan 22, 2013.
AAAhhh. Another good news piece from Ms Bobin. There is hope. Thanks
Andrew Liebich posted at 2:02 pm on Tue, Jan 22, 2013.
It would be "so much more fun" if those who disagree with you politically were destroyed by an asteroid?
Andrew Liebich posted at 1:59 pm on Tue, Jan 22, 2013.
Apparently Ms. Bobin and Mr. Heuer are completely oblivious to the fact that there is an ammendment in Obamacare that prohibits doctors from asking any such questions.
[lol]
Thomas Heuer posted at 1:32 pm on Tue, Jan 22, 2013.
And come on, who visiting this forum actuall believes the independent minded physicians are going to seriously ask their patients about guns. Even if they ask humm, got any guns? And you reply Nope. Bata-bing bata-boom its over. And as Mr Schmidt says below "Thank you for playing ." Please try to refrain from over reactionary hysterias.
Remember government is here to serve you if you have enough money. So you have to ask yourself who is making the government do something. I've discovered over the years that more and more we truely have a government of the people. So I have more suspicions about the motives of people and their hysterical demands. Politicians need two things; money for elections and votes for elections. This is the limit of government conspiracy. If there is money for voting a certain way then thats the way they will go. If there is more peoples vote to act a certqain way then thats the way they will go. Any conspiracy usually comes about trying to meet a demand of a constituency. Government does not act unilaterally unless there is some one who is ready to bank roll a move or has a large constiuency to support the move. So if government is going to do anything find out who is behind the effort. If they are powerful with money and a following look out something might happen. The government has no alterior motives that aren't supported by someone or some group. Of course if the action is against you it is easy to see government as the culprit. However they are just going with the highest bidder. If you want your way you just need to up your ante.If government did everything you wanted then we would not have a government by the people. We would have your government and I don't thisk I would like that. I would start fund raising and community organizing and find those who would think like me.Let the best message and funding win.
Joanne Bobin posted at 12:59 pm on Tue, Jan 22, 2013.
Duh, Andrew. Do you know EXACTLY how much doctors and other health officials are required to report RIGHT NOW? Pre-Obama.
I suppose that you would also take offense that doctors and teachers (along with others) are required to report abuse or suspected abuse, either on a child or a parent. Google it. But I doubt you will find a youtube film, so if you have to read it, most likely you'll have trouble understanding.
What nonsense.
Those who think that anything Obama has proposed is WAY different from current laws is only thinking that because of their HATRED for Obama - not because it mirrors reality.
Joanne Bobin posted at 12:52 pm on Tue, Jan 22, 2013.
Excellent comments, Mr. Heuer.
Best commentary from Republicans during yesterday's festivities: The TEA Pary needs to go - we can't get anything done with TEA Partiers in Congress because they are blocking everything and refuse to compromise.
Predict the TEA Party will go the way of the dinosaur, sans an asteroid crashing into the Earth - but that WOULD be so much more fun!!!
Thomas Heuer posted at 9:38 am on Tue, Jan 22, 2013.
Mr Portal says "It's been stated that if we adhered to the laws on gun control already on the books, we wouldn't need to add more." The fact of the matter is the laws on the books have been systematically been gutted and made null and void by the NRA including congressional blocking of appointments to head the ATF the federal enforcer. Of course if you want something to fail where else would you choose to send it but to congress which has its lowest approval ratings because it gets nothing done. As long as you have the radical antigovernment, antipeople fanatical Tea Partiers who have litterally destroyed an entire branch of government then thabkfully we have a president who can still do the peoples business.done.
It is riotous that there are those who would have us believe that they are necessary to preserving our freedoms by having massive weapon arsnels in case of a government suppression of freedoms. The idea that they would mount an offensive to overcome the national guard or US military might is laughable. The coordination necessary among the foolish is laughable. You may witness another Waco stand off for days but when it was over there would be dead people and back to business as usual. There are needs for personal protection, there are those who do hunt and neither require large capacity magazines. Registering guns simply makes weapons more tracable when used in crimes. Once you remove the responsible reasons for gun ownership you are left with a lot of little men trying to feel bigger with an myth that they are important to us in some imaginary fight for freedom. Anybody need an idea for a comic book?
Jerome Kinderman posted at 8:52 am on Tue, Jan 22, 2013.
I just hope that anyone asked about their guns will simply tell their physicians it's none of their business - because it isn't. Even as one who owns no guns and has no plans (at this time) to acquire one, that will still be my reply if asked. Personal privacy is an important aspect of our American society. Each time our "rulers" command that we obey such edicts, they whittle away at the Constitution. Soon, there'll be nothing left. And then where will we find ourselves? Under their thumbs with no way out.
Andrew Liebich posted at 7:54 am on Tue, Jan 22, 2013.
As part of Obama’s 23 executive orders, doctors will be transformed into gun control snitches who are ordered by Obama to ask patients about guns they might have at home.
What part of doctor-patient confidentiality is now history do Obama apologists not understand?
Andrew Liebich posted at 7:43 am on Tue, Jan 22, 2013.
President Obama has now clearly communicated his intent to eviscerate the second amendment rights of American citizens by pursuing executive orders to curtail the right to keep and bear arms without congressional authorization and in violation of the second amendment.
Obama has aided America’s enemies, violating his oath, by sending funds to insurgents in Syria who are being commanded by Al-Qaeda terrorists.
Obama has violated federal law by overseeing a cover-up surrounding Operation Fast and Furious, the transfer of guns to Mexican drug cartels direct from the federal government.
Obama has lied to the American people by overseeing a cover-up of the Benghazi attack which directly led to the deaths of four American citizens. The cover-up has been called “Obama’s Watergate,” yet months after the incident, no one in the administration has been held accountable.
Obama has brazenly undermined the power of Congress by insisting his authority came from the United Nations Security Council prior to the attack on Libya and that Congressional approval was not necessary. “I don’t even have to get to the Constitutional question,” said Obama. This is an act that “constitutes an impeachable high crime and misdemeanor under article II, section 4 of the Constitution.
Obama has ignored Congressional rejection of the cybersecurity bill and instead indicated he will pursue an unconstitutional executive order.
Obama has signed into law the National Defense Authorization Act which includes provisions that permit the abduction and military detention without trial of U.S. citizens, violating Habeas Corpus. Despite Obama claiming he would not use the provisions to incarcerate U.S. citizens, it was his administration that specifically demanded these powers be included in the final NDAA bill!
Obama has enacted universal health care mandates that force Americans to buy health insurance, a clear violation of the Constitution in exceeding congressional power to regulate interstate commerce. Obama has also handed out preferential waivers to corporations friendly to his administration.
Obama has declared war on America’s coal industry by promising to bankrupt any company that attempts to build a new coal plant while using unconstitutional EPA regulations to strangle competition, ensuring Americans see their energy costs rise year after year.
Obama has violated the Constitution’s Takings and Due Process Clauses when he bullied the secured creditors of automaker Chrysler into accepting 30 cents on the dollar while politically connected labor unions and preferential others received better deals.
Obama has violated Article II of the Constitution by using signing statements as part of his executive usurpation of power.[sleeping]
[sleeping]
Jerome Kinderman posted at 6:05 am on Tue, Jan 22, 2013.
As long as there are those who believe that our nation might be following the folly of the German people, there will be letters like this one. It's funny (not in a ha-ha sort of way), but my stance on abortion has me thinking the same way at times. The more I've been trying to sound the trumpet of disgrace over the killing of so many unborn babies, the more my mind turns toward the atrocities of the infamous Third Reich and how value-less human beings have become here.
Have we as a people become jaded? What has happened to us that now we've permitted out government to run rough-shod over decency, integrity and basic goodness in order to let our so-called leaders take our place in our personal destinies and by extension our collective one?
I'm worried - who shouldn't be? But all this didn't start with Obama; but he's sure taking incredible advantage of it. Maybe we are too soft; too spoiled. Our idea of poverty here must be like royalty to other common people around the globe. They must think us very self-centered - which we really are.
I don't have nearly enough answers for the problems we're facing. But to turn it all over to "big brother" is NOT nearly the best one. We will rue these days I can guarantee you that. We’ve advanced over the pinnacle of our course in history and are heading downward. And like we all know, going down a hill seems to be easier – but it’s also a whole lot faster! And the faster we go, the further down we transverse well below our previous “worst of times.”
Steve Schmidt posted at 3:52 am on Tue, Jan 22, 2013.
I would like to take this opportunity to invoke Godwin's Law and declare this discussion finished. Thank you for playing Mr Portal, perhaps you will do better next time.