Lodinews.com

default avatar
Welcome to the site! Login or Signup below.
|
||
Logout|My Dashboard

More could have been done for those whose car was impounded

Print
Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size

Posted: Saturday, April 2, 2011 12:00 am | Updated: 9:58 am, Sat Apr 2, 2011.

In the past, I heard and defended accusations about the Lodi Police Department. The headline on March 19, 2011, "Critics say costs, impounded cars aren't worth modest number of DUI arrests at checkpoints" I will address; although not being the only situation that has passed by my attention. I am very disappointed in the LPD.

The good citizens of Lodi wish to believe our LPD places serving people first. Are we, the reader, to believe that what we read was a onetime "slip-up?" Certainly not, the LPD officers are humans too.

At least one out of 10-plus officers should have been aware of serving the two people in their presence (Miss Moreno and her boyfriend). They should have been offered a phone call or have been driven home. If they had encountered a situation while walking like we often read about, that could have been the headline, and we would have read about something worse.

LPD, please serve the people that you select to confront when they are in your presence. With all your training how could 10-plus officers not be aware that the people of the impounded car needed help? Was perhaps finding a DUI and another licensing problem considered more important?

What really is COTS? Does it dictate how our officers must think, and have our officers arrived at a position where they cannot do what is just simply right? Would the outcome have been the same if that situation would have been a LPD family member? The people of Lodi are LPD officers' family.

Whoever was in charge of that incident should have issued a citation, and someone should have driven them to their destination since the same would extended to the suspected DUI person. Would that require another officer for that service? What about using a Lodi Police Partner volunteer for that ride? I question the number of officers assigned for a checkpoint. Seems like a job overtime benefit for our officers.

Don Sommerfeld

Lodi

Rules of Conduct

  • 1 Use your real name. You must register with your full first and last name before you can comment. (And don't pretend you're someone else.)
  • 2 Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually oriented language.
  • 3 Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
  • 4 Be truthful. Don't lie about anyone or anything. Don't post unsubstantiated allegations, rumors or gossip that could harm the reputation of a person, company or organization.
  • 5 Be nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
  • 6 Stay on topic. Make sure your comments are about the story. Don't insult each other.
  • 7 Tell us if the discussion is getting out of hand. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
  • 8 Share what you know, and ask about what you don't.

Welcome to the discussion.

2 comments:

  • Jerome Kinderman posted at 9:15 am on Sat, Apr 2, 2011.

    Jerome R Kinderman Posts: 2255

    Mr. Sommerfield goes on to suggest that "Whoever was in charge of that incident should have issued a citation, and someone should have driven them to their destination since the same would extended (sic) to the suspected DUI person."

    The suspected "DUI person" would have been escorted to jail - is that what you think should have been afforded here? This matter keeps getting funnier all the time; except that very few of us are laughing because it's so pathetic.

     
  • Jerome Kinderman posted at 9:11 am on Sat, Apr 2, 2011.

    Jerome R Kinderman Posts: 2255

    Of course the questions still remain - did the police act accordingly to the law or did they in any way violate it?

    If the former, why then should "They should have been offered a phone call or have been driven home?" This checkpoint was not a taxi-cab or designated driver service. It was put into place to ensure the safety of other drivers on the road that night. As unfortunate as it was for these two people, the responsibility for that misfortune still rests on their shoulders - not on the police for doing their jobs.

    Where would it have stopped if as you suggest favors be afforded to them? How could the police in good conscience have ever denied the phone call or ride home from other scofflaws once this exception had been made?

    Since no evidence has been provided thus far that the cops did nothing wrong, they MUST be given the respect due to them.

     

Recent Comments

Posted 7 hours ago by Joe Baxter.

article: San Joaquin County supervisors approve …

I am still wondering why someone that resides in Sacramento County should be concerned with San Joaquin County politics. Unless it is just …

More...

Posted 12 hours ago by Joanne Bobin.

article: Letter: Obamacare is not the program pr…

Good work, Mr. Barrow. You have identified many in the past, and now finally with some results!

More...

Posted 12 hours ago by Joanne Bobin.

article: Letter: Obamacare is not the program pr…

Thank you to the LNS for FINALLY rejecting a letter due to plagiarism. There have been countless instances of letters copied and pasted fr…

More...

Posted Yesterday by the old dog.

article: Letter: I’m not the one who should move…

Walter: Concerning "Swiftboats" another John did offend me. Kerry gives himself a Purple Heart while cutting himself shaving. …

More...

Posted Yesterday by Andrew Liebich.

article: Letter: Liberal policies damage our ind…

[sleeping] http://youtu.be/cA8FTjAzRR8

More...

Video

Popular Stories

Poll

Should graduations return to the Grape Bowl?

Lodi Unified leaders are moving Lodi and Tokay high school graduations from the Grape Bowl to the Spanos Center at UOP in Stockton. They cite limited seating, costs and unpredictable weather at the Grape Bowl. But others say graduations at the Grape Bowl are an important Lodi tradition, and one reason many supported renovating the stadium. What do you think?

Total Votes: 78

Loading…

Mailing List

Subscribe to a mailing list to have daily news sent directly to your inbox.

  • Breaking News

    Would you like to receive breaking news alerts? Sign up now!

  • News Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily news headlines? Sign up now!

  • Sports Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily sports headlines? Sign up now!

Manage Your Lists