Lodinews.com

default avatar
Welcome to the site! Login or Signup below.
|
||
Logout|My Dashboard

Letter: Comments about Lodi’s wastewater plant expansion overlooks several issues

Print
Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size

Posted: Tuesday, April 22, 2014 12:43 am

This is a letter in response to Richard Prima’s letter to the editor published March 27, Not all work on treatment plant was for growth.”

True, several years ago the wastewater transmission line from the city to the plant needed extensive repairs and cost several million dollars, and it was the financial responsibility of the ratepayers, but that a separate issue. The subject is about the wastewater treatment plant expansion/upgrade, which in 1991 cost the city $38 million.

The claim is that staff requires new development to reimburse the city for past and future expenses. The facts suggest the contrary. Why would developers ask staff for a reduction of impact fees, knowing they would be required to reimburse the city for that reduction?

There are several other issues that need mentioning.

The city pays several million dollars a year in principal and interest on bonds that financed the wastewater plant expansion, and a large percentage of this debt was incurred to expand the plant to accommodate future development. Developer impact fees should be paying 50 percent of this debt!

Staff has an incentive to build homes, which generates tens of thousands of dollars for each home built for permits and other fees, which goes into the city coffer, and helps pay for salary and retirement benefits. But it does nothing to mitigate the impacts to the city’s infrastructure.

This year’s city budget for 2013-14 consists of a $179,909,000 revenue projection and an expenditure of $177,800,000 in tax dollars spent to manage the everyday operations of the city.

The wastewater fund estimated revenue for this 2013-14 year $15,035,170, an increase of $800,000 from the previous year, and more rate increases are planned!

In 2010-11, the city had 455 employee positions on its roster. When the economy faltered, the city reduced that number to 394 employee positions. Even this seems more than adequate. The city’s practice of furloughing city employees is proof the city could downsize further. Why are the taxpayers paying for five days?

John Slaughterback

Lodi

Rules of Conduct

  • 1 Use your real name. You must register with your full first and last name before you can comment. (And don’t pretend you’re someone else.)
  • 2 Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually oriented language.
  • 3 Don’t threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
  • 4 Be truthful. Don't lie about anyone or anything. Don't post unsubstantiated allegations, rumors or gossip that could harm the reputation of a person, company or organization.
  • 5 Be nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
  • 6 Stay on topic. Make sure your comments are about the story. Don’t insult each other.
  • 7 Tell us if the discussion is getting out of hand. Use the ‘Report’ link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
  • 8 Share what you know, and ask about what you don't.
  • 9 Don’t be a troll.
  • 10 Don’t reveal personal information about other commenters. You may reveal your own personal information, but we advise you not to do so.
  • 11 We reserve the right, at our discretion, to monitor, delete or choose not to post any comment. This may include removing or monitoring posts that we believe violate the spirit or letter of these rules, or that we otherwise determine at our discretion needs to be monitored, not posted, or deleted.

Welcome to the discussion.

Recent Comments

Posted 4 hours ago by Thomas Heuer.

article: Letter: Obama may be protecting his chi…

Mr Elliot Such wishful thinking your "Three strikes and you are out." One can only wish. [wink]

More...

Posted 4 hours ago by Thomas Heuer.

article: Letter: Obama may be protecting his chi…

Again and again Andrew strives to verify Mr Elliots declaration "The biggest shock is that someone actually expects us to believe this…

More...

Posted 4 hours ago by Treacy Elliott.

article: Letter: Obama may be protecting his chi…

You are absolutely correct. Andrew believes in what he believes in. Nothing anyone can say or do won't change that.

More...

Posted 5 hours ago by Thomas Heuer.

article: Letter: Obama may be protecting his chi…

[thumbup] Thank you Ms Welch you took the words right out of my er Andrews mouth. [wink]

More...

Posted 5 hours ago by Andrew Liebich.

article: Letter: Many states allow guns in schoo…

Mike, You may very well be the only member of the NRA who is not strongly opposed to AB 1014. Have you voiced your opposition to their lett…

More...

Video

Popular Stories

Poll

Loading…

Mailing List

Subscribe to a mailing list to have daily news sent directly to your inbox.

  • Breaking News

    Would you like to receive breaking news alerts? Sign up now!

  • News Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily news headlines? Sign up now!

  • Sports Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily sports headlines? Sign up now!

Manage Your Lists