Lodinews.com

default avatar
Welcome to the site! Login or Signup below.
|
||
Logout|My Dashboard

Letter: How will development reimburse city of Lodi?

Print
Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size

Posted: Saturday, November 30, 2013 12:00 am

Wally Sandelin, director of Lodi’s Public Works department, took issue with my letter of Nov. 12 (Mr. Sandelins’ response, “Lodi residents are not subsidizing new developments’ obligations to pay for impacts to the city’s infrastructure”).

Mr. Sandelin never gave an explanation of how development would reimburse the city for impacts to the city’s infrastructure.

The wastewater treatment plant expansion included millions of dollars that added redundant capacity to the sewer plant for future development.

This redundant capacity cost millions, and is a debt development owes. It can’t be repaid when there’s a reduction of developer impact fees.

The city manager’s argument for reducing impact fees was to stimulate the economy and put people back to work.

John Slaughterback

Lodi

Rules of Conduct

  • 1 Use your real name. You must register with your full first and last name before you can comment. (And don't pretend you're someone else.)
  • 2 Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually oriented language.
  • 3 Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
  • 4 Be truthful. Don't lie about anyone or anything. Don't post unsubstantiated allegations, rumors or gossip that could harm the reputation of a person, company or organization.
  • 5 Be nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
  • 6 Stay on topic. Make sure your comments are about the story. Don't insult each other.
  • 7 Tell us if the discussion is getting out of hand. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
  • 8 Share what you know, and ask about what you don't.
  • 9 Don’t be a troll.
  • 10 We reserve the right, at our discretion, to monitor, delete or choose not to post any comment. This may include removing or monitoring posts that we believe violate the spirit or letter of these rules, or that we otherwise determine at our discretion needs to be monitored, not posted, or deleted.

Welcome to the discussion.

1 comment:

  • Doug Chaney posted at 1:29 pm on Sun, Dec 1, 2013.

    advocate Posts: 499

    Thanks Hansen, Johnson, Katzakian and John Beckman?

     

Recent Comments

Posted 5 hours ago by Walter Chang.

Posted 6 hours ago by Walter Chang.

Posted 6 hours ago by Walter Chang.

article: Letter: The people are better off becau…

Haters gotta hate, Joe. [thumbdown]

More...

Posted 6 hours ago by Walter Chang.

article: Letter: There was a ‘stand down’ order …

"Ben Ghazi" Folks, you can still drink Bill's "conspiracy coolaid" but the party's over. This fantasy now totally de…

More...

Posted 6 hours ago by Andrew Liebich.

article: Letter: Obama may be protecting his chi…

The above posts clearly violate rules 4, 6, 7, 8, & 9. Are you using new rule #10 as justification for having posted them Simon?

More...

Video

Popular Stories

Poll

Loading…

Mailing List

Subscribe to a mailing list to have daily news sent directly to your inbox.

  • Breaking News

    Would you like to receive breaking news alerts? Sign up now!

  • News Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily news headlines? Sign up now!

  • Sports Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily sports headlines? Sign up now!

Manage Your Lists