Lodinews.com

default avatar
Welcome to the site! Login or Signup below.
|
||
Logout|My Dashboard

Hugh Scanlon ran a productive and informative water district meeting

Print
Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size

Posted: Saturday, June 11, 2011 12:00 am | Updated: 6:06 am, Sat Jun 11, 2011.

I would like to recognize and commend my representative on the North San Joaquin Water Conservation District, Hugh Scanlon. At Monday's meeting, Mr. Scanlon led a productive and informative water district meeting, in the absence of Chairman Bryan Pilkington.

Board directors Mark Beck and Joe Peterson also deserve recognition for their continued professional demeanor. Since their election to the board last fall, they continue to work on overcoming the many obstacles placed in their path. They have tirelessly worked to benefit the district, identifying problem areas and seeking common sense solutions. Most certainly neither Mr. Beck nor Mr. Peterson have deserved to be labeled "obstructionists," as voiced by the other board directors.

It was refreshing to attend a meeting that was not contentious and where board and audience members were not ridiculed, spoken down to, belittled, or denied their right to speak. I found it most embarrassing to have other water districts mock and laugh at the inaction of our board of directors in a recent Lodi News-Sentinel article.

I look forward to the next meeting scheduled for 5 p.m. on June 27 at the Liberty Fire Dept., and trust that this meeting, too, will be conducted with fairness and civility. The agenda items (hiring of a new watermaster, accounting firm, legal representation, delinquent ground water charges, Tracy Lakes, and the district mission and goals) are important to all residents of the district, so please try to attend and see your local government in action.

Janice Tucker

Acampo

Rules of Conduct

  • 1 Use your real name. You must register with your full first and last name before you can comment. (And don’t pretend you’re someone else.)
  • 2 Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually oriented language.
  • 3 Don’t threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
  • 4 Be truthful. Don't lie about anyone or anything. Don't post unsubstantiated allegations, rumors or gossip that could harm the reputation of a person, company or organization.
  • 5 Be nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
  • 6 Stay on topic. Make sure your comments are about the story. Don’t insult each other.
  • 7 Tell us if the discussion is getting out of hand. Use the ‘Report’ link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
  • 8 Share what you know, and ask about what you don't.
  • 9 Don’t be a troll.
  • 10 Don’t reveal personal information about other commenters. You may reveal your own personal information, but we advise you not to do so.
  • 11 We reserve the right, at our discretion, to monitor, delete or choose not to post any comment. This may include removing or monitoring posts that we believe violate the spirit or letter of these rules, or that we otherwise determine at our discretion needs to be monitored, not posted, or deleted.

Welcome to the discussion.

2 comments:

  • daniel hutchins posted at 9:36 pm on Sat, Jun 11, 2011.

    daniel hutchins Posts: 1338

    Hugh: If you're reading this, congratulations!

     
  • Doug Chaney posted at 9:52 am on Sat, Jun 11, 2011.

    Doug Chaney Posts: 1232

    In my opinion, two of these board members were part of the past problems and need to stop finger pointing and blaming others for past mistakes. It's their job to solve the problems along with the rest of the board and all agricultural interests involved. It's time to quit the scenario of the boards' past and move on to make this a functioning, efficient water district beneficial to all those involved. Good luck on that.

     

Recent Comments

Posted 3 hours ago by Mike Adams.

article: Letter: Questions for Obama supporters

There won't be a new party. The tea baggers have more or less left the GOP because moderates don't support their draconian views on everyt…

More...

Posted 3 hours ago by Mike Adams.

article: Letter: Questions for Obama supporters

Well only the republicans seem to think he's an idiot or a liar. And again: where are the winnable republican candidates? Palin? Please …

More...

Posted 3 hours ago by Mike Adams.

article: Letter: Many states allow guns in schoo…

That's because andrew took it from here: https://www.google.com/search?q=The+victims+of+this+proposed+law+might+have+no+idea+they+have+eve…

More...

Posted 3 hours ago by Thomas Heuer.

article: Letter: Questions for Obama supporters

Mr Taves (and Mr Dawes) If you read what has already been posted you would realize that Mr Barrow has already answered your "Mr. Viall…

More...

Posted 4 hours ago by stan taves.

article: Letter: Questions for Obama supporters

The right doesn't get it? What's to get? that the left is chasing a dream that will never be realized; because they don't understand that o…

More...

Video

Popular Stories

Poll

Loading…

Mailing List

Subscribe to a mailing list to have daily news sent directly to your inbox.

  • Breaking News

    Would you like to receive breaking news alerts? Sign up now!

  • News Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily news headlines? Sign up now!

  • Sports Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily sports headlines? Sign up now!

Manage Your Lists