default avatar
Welcome to the site! Login or Signup below.
Logout|My Dashboard

Citizens in multi-family housing should participate in meter talks

Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size

Posted: Tuesday, February 5, 2013 12:00 am

My recent comments printed in the Wednesday, Jan. 29 paper need some clarification.

During the Lodi City Council study session to receive information regarding future water utility policies, I said, "Some of these (regulations) and some of these proposals, I think, are a bit out of touch with reality." Specifically, that was in reference to a statement from a state water agency's future goal of having every unit in multi-family housing be metered for water.

In reality, many older multi-family apartments have two water lines into each unit — a cold water line, and a hot water line from a large community hot water heater tank. So, two meters for each apartment?

I urge all property managers, property owners and tenants in multi-family properties to be part of the upcoming discussions, and to voice your concerns and opinions on water metering multi-family housing in the city of Lodi.

Nancy Watts


Rules of Conduct

  • 1 Use your real name. You must register with your full first and last name before you can comment. (And don't pretend you're someone else.)
  • 2 Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually oriented language.
  • 3 Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
  • 4 Be truthful. Don't lie about anyone or anything. Don't post unsubstantiated allegations, rumors or gossip that could harm the reputation of a person, company or organization.
  • 5 Be nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
  • 6 Stay on topic. Make sure your comments are about the story. Don't insult each other.
  • 7 Tell us if the discussion is getting out of hand. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
  • 8 Share what you know, and ask about what you don't.

Welcome to the discussion.


  • Bobcatbob Ingram posted at 10:23 am on Wed, Feb 6, 2013.

    99er Posts: 119

    pardon Me for cutting across the thread again but I want to write privately to Doug Chaney... I tried to go through face book but they want me to pay a dollar.
    sooo Doug look in Your ' other' folder in Facebook I have sent You a friends request,
    ....... Thanks All for Understanding

  • Bobcatbob Ingram posted at 10:06 am on Wed, Feb 6, 2013.

    99er Posts: 119

    Your elected officials not acting like Your the Boss ??
    Since Your community pays them it seems they should have meetings convenient to the community, but count Your blessings because here in Sacramento they sometimes hold meetings in the evening but NOBODY can attend unless they are on the 'approved' list.

    Do you think a live video feed from all Government meetings, except Dept of Defense Types, would help ?

    and to jump back to the original thread starter, Nancy Watts I don't know if You are on a smart meter system but here in Sac they can read the water You've used from down town, so the cost of monthly reading is minimal.
    What do You think about it Nancy ??

  • Doug Chaney posted at 6:54 am on Wed, Feb 6, 2013.

    advocate Posts: 499

    Ms. Watts, that's why the Lodi city council has these Tuesday 7AM "shirtsleeve" meetings, in my opinion, is to keep concerned citizens like us in the blind on these important issues by discussing issues such as this in the early morning meetings where they are well aware that very few, if any, concerned Lodians would take time off work to attend these "secret" 7AM meetings. I'm even surprised the Sentinel covered this issue, as many other important outcomes of these 7AM meetings are passed over in the Lodi paper for news pertaining to Galt and their dysfunctional council and their panderings, rather than inform the citizenry of what's happening in Lodi by opting to direct attention to the city of Galt and their school district and internal city financial problems. Can you offer me any other sound reasoning for any government entity, city councils, etc., to have regular 7AM meetings? If these are indeed public meetings, then why are they constantly scheduled so most Lodians are unable to attend and seemingly always cover important issues that should be presented at the public meetings on every other Wednesday at 7PM, allowing most Lodians to participate and make any comments or objections they should have concerning the particular issue.


Recent Comments

Posted 17 hours ago by the old dog.

article: Letter: I’m not the one who should move…

No need to move to another country, other countries are moving to this country. Though Barry is commander in grief, if your in the milita…


Posted 18 hours ago by nth degree wise.

article: Letter: Pastor Frank Nolton forgets abo…

[offtopic] Both rights yes. However marriage doesn't mass kill kids on school grounds so restrictions are only needed on guns.


Posted 18 hours ago by Joe Baxter.

article: Letter: Little signs show our economy i…

Bobbin, I don't take any perscription medications on a regular basis. I am healthy as they come and plan on sticking around to expose liber…


Posted 19 hours ago by Frank Gayaldo.

article: San Joaquin County supervisors approve …

Hi Walt, while my bias towards the county needing a new sheriff is clear, I base my comments on facts, not personal attacks. I am not a &q…


Posted 20 hours ago by Andrew Liebich.

article: Letter: Little signs show our economy i…

Haven't you heard Mr. Baxter... " raising the debt ceiling, which has been done over a hundred times, does not increase our debt"…



Popular Stories



Mailing List

Subscribe to a mailing list to have daily news sent directly to your inbox.

  • Breaking News

    Would you like to receive breaking news alerts? Sign up now!

  • News Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily news headlines? Sign up now!

  • Sports Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily sports headlines? Sign up now!

Manage Your Lists