Lodinews.com

default avatar
Welcome to the site! Login or Signup below.
|
||
Logout|My Dashboard

‘States of America’ still exist today

Print
Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size

Posted: Wednesday, July 11, 2012 12:00 am | Updated: 6:24 am, Wed Jul 11, 2012.

I am proud of the July Fourth holiday, definitely a legitimate holiday. Indeed, the Declaration of Independence established the people's independence from England, and they styled themselves as the "States of America," an entity which still exists today — but it is not used. In spite of the blunders which followed, one event is undisputed: Lord Cornwallis surrendered his sword to General Washington in 1781, and England lost its claim to the land.

All that remained was that the colonists would establish a government. If lawyers were involved, what an irony! Is the title "esquire" not British?

The States of America possessed a right to establish a government on the land, but I don't think they did. In the Treaty of Paris of 1783, King George III used the title "arch-treasurer and prince elector of the Holy Roman Empire etc., and of the United States of America." A few years later, the Constitution is stated to be "for the United States of America," and it made no reference to "States of America," which had declared independence. (The reference to the Holy Roman Empire etc. is another story.)

I also think it is interesting that "United States" appeared in the Northwest Ordinance of 1787, which established districts, without making reference to natural geographical features of land. Subsequently, the preamble stated that "We the People of the United States" (created through districts, not upon land) do ordain and establish the Constitution for an entity for which King George III was arch treasurer and prince elector.

Daniel Hutchins

Acampo

Rules of Conduct

  • 1 Use your real name. You must register with your full first and last name before you can comment. (And don’t pretend you’re someone else.)
  • 2 Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually oriented language.
  • 3 Don’t threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
  • 4 Be truthful. Don't lie about anyone or anything. Don't post unsubstantiated allegations, rumors or gossip that could harm the reputation of a person, company or organization.
  • 5 Be nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
  • 6 Stay on topic. Make sure your comments are about the story. Don’t insult each other.
  • 7 Tell us if the discussion is getting out of hand. Use the ‘Report’ link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
  • 8 Share what you know, and ask about what you don't.
  • 9 Don’t be a troll.
  • 10 Don’t reveal personal information about other commenters. You may reveal your own personal information, but we advise you not to do so.
  • 11 We reserve the right, at our discretion, to monitor, delete or choose not to post any comment. This may include removing or monitoring posts that we believe violate the spirit or letter of these rules, or that we otherwise determine at our discretion needs to be monitored, not posted, or deleted.

Welcome to the discussion.

4 comments:

  • daniel hutchins posted at 7:39 pm on Mon, Jul 23, 2012.

    daniel hutchins Posts: 1338

    Jerome, I'm sorry I gave up on receiving any response, and I didn't see that you posted.

    Although you don't understand, this is necessary information in order to understand what happened to our country ever since the Treaty of Paris.

    I only had 250 words, but the people who crafted this situation have had 220 years of practice, and they have enjoyed the luxury of control over journalism.

     
  • Jerome Kinderman posted at 3:46 pm on Sat, Jul 14, 2012.

    Jerome R Kinderman Posts: 2327

    I might regret this but what the heck, we only live once -

    Huh?

     
  • daniel hutchins posted at 11:25 pm on Wed, Jul 11, 2012.

    daniel hutchins Posts: 1338

    this is like applying for a driver license, and the name was misspelled, or the wrong name was used, or someone else's name was used.

     
  • daniel hutchins posted at 8:18 pm on Wed, Jul 11, 2012.

    daniel hutchins Posts: 1338

    I mentioned fundamental defects, and I think the information is so shocking that people don't know what to think.

     

Recent Comments

Posted 1 hour ago by Ted Lauchland.

article: Letter: Darwin’s theory has never been …

The kids are not going to like it. According to your definitions they will now have to go to public school on Saturdays so they can study a…

More...

Posted 1 hour ago by Treacy Elliott.

article: Letter: Obama may be protecting his chi…

Actually Andy if you read the executive order and did some research on the Presidential Records Act you would find that the executive order…

More...

Posted 2 hours ago by Walter Chang.

article: Letter: Joe Guzzardi’s June 20 column c…

"white" E.D. you can't offend me. But for the sake of "forum decorum" please don't try. The most frequent emotion I…

More...

Posted 3 hours ago by Walter Chang.

article: Letter: Darwin’s theory has never been …

"So try to stay focused on the topic at hand and NOT lash out so much!! [thumbup]

More...

Posted 3 hours ago by Walter Chang.

article: Letter: Darwin’s theory has never been …

"star stuff" E.D. you totally missed the mark. Again. Your supposed to lecture the author of this pointless letter - not me!! …

More...

Video

Popular Stories

Poll

Loading…

Your News

News for the community, by the community.

Mailing List

Subscribe to a mailing list to have daily news sent directly to your inbox.

  • Breaking News

    Would you like to receive breaking news alerts? Sign up now!

  • News Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily news headlines? Sign up now!

  • Sports Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily sports headlines? Sign up now!

Manage Your Lists