Lodinews.com

default avatar
Welcome to the site! Login or Signup below.
|
||
Logout|My Dashboard

Letter: Developer impact fees can’t pay for water treatment plant

Print
Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size

Posted: Wednesday, March 26, 2014 12:00 am

This letter is in response to the letter “Will new development really pay back ratepayers for water treatment plant?” on March 19 by Roy Bitz.

How will new development fees reimburse ratepayers?

“According to the Public Works information pamphlet mailed to residents of the city: The proposed schedule of utility rate increase will not be used for infrastructure required to serve the demands presented by new development. The new development impact fee program requires new development to reimburse the city for past and future investments in water, wastewater, streets, police, fire and other infrastructure. In fact, if new development exceeds that forecast in the financial models, this could partially offset recommended inflationary increases.”

The preceding paragraph came from the Public Works pamphlet mailed to the residents of the city. This account is a complete fabrication. Are the citizens of Lodi expected to believe everything they see in print? A politician once said a person can say anything — it doesn’t make it so. His words were meant for an opponent, but those words apply equally well to governments.

Several months ago while council was in session, Walley Sandelin, Public Works Director, became agitated with questions about developer impact fees and blurted out that development has never paid their fair share and probably never will.

The city is paying millions in interest each year for bond financing of the wastewater treatment plant expansion — paid for with ratepayer funds. The purpose for the expansion was to service new development. Shouldn’t developer impact fees be paying the interest on these bonds? But then how can they, when the council reduced developer impact fees 60 percent for seven years?

John Slaughterback

Lodi

Rules of Conduct

  • 1 Use your real name. You must register with your full first and last name before you can comment. (And don’t pretend you’re someone else.)
  • 2 Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually oriented language.
  • 3 Don’t threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
  • 4 Be truthful. Don't lie about anyone or anything. Don't post unsubstantiated allegations, rumors or gossip that could harm the reputation of a person, company or organization.
  • 5 Be nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
  • 6 Stay on topic. Make sure your comments are about the story. Don’t insult each other.
  • 7 Tell us if the discussion is getting out of hand. Use the ‘Report’ link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
  • 8 Share what you know, and ask about what you don't.
  • 9 Don’t be a troll.
  • 10 Don’t reveal personal information about other commenters. You may reveal your own personal information, but we advise you not to do so.
  • 11 We reserve the right, at our discretion, to monitor, delete or choose not to post any comment. This may include removing or monitoring posts that we believe violate the spirit or letter of these rules, or that we otherwise determine at our discretion needs to be monitored, not posted, or deleted.

Welcome to the discussion.

Recent Comments

Posted 1 hour ago by Mike Adams.

article: Letter: Questions for Obama supporters

Why does the right always blame the left when a democrat gets elected? They should look at themselves in the mirror. If you look back at…

More...

Posted 1 hour ago by Mike Adams.

article: Letter: We need to stop meddling, spend…

So somehow, shifting to another conspiracy website with two people no one has ever heard of is supposed to convince us of what? Just more…

More...

Posted 4 hours ago by Andrew Liebich.

article: Letter: Questions for Obama supporters

A list of the 13 unanimous Supreme Court rulings can be found here. http://www.redstate.com/2014/06/27/abuses-too-far/ [sleeping]

More...

Posted 4 hours ago by Andrew Liebich.

article: We won’t repost Sandy Hook hoax comments

BAMBOOZLE - transitive verb : to deceive by underhanded methods "I voted in the poll multiple times" That was fun - thanks![…

More...

Posted 4 hours ago by Rick Houdack.

article: Letter: Arab and Jewish conflict is due…

No, the upheaval and death we see is not the result of disbelief, it is the direct result of delusional belief in irrational myths. We hav…

More...

Video

Popular Stories

Poll

Loading…

Mailing List

Subscribe to a mailing list to have daily news sent directly to your inbox.

  • Breaking News

    Would you like to receive breaking news alerts? Sign up now!

  • News Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily news headlines? Sign up now!

  • Sports Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily sports headlines? Sign up now!

Manage Your Lists