Lodinews.com

default avatar
Welcome to the site! Login or Signup below.
|
||
Logout|My Dashboard

Letter: Urging a ‘no’ vote on Assembly Bill 1897

Print
Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size

Posted: Wednesday, August 27, 2014 11:14 pm

The California Legislature is expected to vote on a measure in the coming days that attempts to shift accountability in a subcontractor relationship by unfairly holding California employers liable for the wage and hour violations of subcontractors — despite the lack of control that California employers can exert over third parties.

Known as Assembly Bill 1897 and authored by Assemblyman Roger Hernández, D–West Covina, the bill is a reckless attempt at lawmaking that will have a drastic impact on our state’s economy, particularly on our agricultural industry.

The bill is opposed by California businesses and organizations throughout the state. Almost every California industry comes under fire with AB 1897, including construction, agriculture, hospitals, restaurants, newspapers, retailers, food processors, and banks.

California’s Department of Finance also opposes the measure, noting that it will result in unbudgeted state costs. In fact, the Department of Finance warned the bill would also expose California employers to liability for Labor Code violations committed by other employers, cutting incentives for businesses to operate in California and leading to businesses either closing or downsizing.

AB 1897 will discourage the use of contractors and their employees. And it will not prevent labor violations from happening. The only thing that it will do is allow bad-actor employers to shift liability to a company that did not create the violation, know of the violation or have the ability to prevent the violation.

What’s more, the bill allows an employee to file a lawsuit against the third-party company only, without first seeking to obtain relief from their actual employer for the alleged violations. The employer who created the violations should be the first in line of responsibility.

Essentially, AB 1897 sweeps up countless law-abiding companies in the pursuit of a few bad actors. Laws are already on the books for such issues and piling on another law is irresponsible. Unfairly holding innocent California employers liable for actions they cannot control is the wrong approach. As a California job-creator and agricultural leader, I am calling our state elected officials, particularly those who represent the rich and diverse San Joaquin region, to vote no on AB 1897.

Kim Ledbetter-Bronson

Vino Farms Vice President

Lodi

Rules of Conduct

  • 1 Use your real name. You must register with your full first and last name before you can comment. (And don’t pretend you’re someone else.)
  • 2 Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually oriented language.
  • 3 Don’t threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
  • 4 Be truthful. Don't lie about anyone or anything. Don't post unsubstantiated allegations, rumors or gossip that could harm the reputation of a person, company or organization.
  • 5 Be nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
  • 6 Stay on topic. Make sure your comments are about the story. Don’t insult each other.
  • 7 Tell us if the discussion is getting out of hand. Use the ‘Report’ link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
  • 8 Share what you know, and ask about what you don't.
  • 9 Don’t be a troll.
  • 10 Don’t reveal personal information about other commenters. You may reveal your own personal information, but we advise you not to do so.
  • 11 We reserve the right, at our discretion, to monitor, delete or choose not to post any comment. This may include removing or monitoring posts that we believe violate the spirit or letter of these rules, or that we otherwise determine at our discretion needs to be monitored, not posted, or deleted.

Welcome to the discussion.

Recent Comments

Posted 9 hours ago by Kevin Paglia.

article: Letter: Evil is always present

I remember when Bush went to war in the Middle East I heard from the Left that the ONLY reason was to keep the oil flowing. Saddam killed …

More...

Posted 10 hours ago by Ed Walters.

article: Letter: Evil is always present

First let me apologize, I stated "The Last Survivor" should have been the "Soul Survivor". Barrow states that it …

More...

Posted 11 hours ago by Jien Kaur.

article: Letter: Evil is always present

Interesting. Although the United States sent many men to the death with battle against Japan - and the history tells what terrors men such…

More...

Posted 11 hours ago by Christina Welch.

article: Letter: Voters should focus on a new di…

If you don't want to debate issues, then you are clearly in the wrong place. That is what we all do on here, and it is usually an open dis…

More...

Posted 12 hours ago by Thomas Heuer.

article: Letter: Voters should focus on a new di…

I have to admit I know litle about proportional representation and will look it up when I get a chance. So far from what I am reading here …

More...

Video

Popular Stories

Poll

Loading…

Your News

News for the community, by the community.

Mailing List

Subscribe to a mailing list to have daily news sent directly to your inbox.

  • Breaking News

    Would you like to receive breaking news alerts? Sign up now!

  • News Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily news headlines? Sign up now!

  • Sports Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily sports headlines? Sign up now!

Manage Your Lists