default avatar
Welcome to the site! Login or Signup below.
Logout|My Dashboard

Lodi, Malibu and the environment

Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size

Posted: Monday, May 3, 2010 12:00 am

With all the news about water meters, we might ponder this e-mail from a relative who recently moved to Malibu:

"It's been a real experience so far in the effects of environmentalist wackos on a town. Apparently, the leftward inhabitants of Malibu have decided and continue to decide that Malibu should retain its natural beauty, so all kinds of development, both residential and commercial, are heavily discouraged. To this end, most of Malibu has no city water or sewer. In the neighborhood I'm in, there aren't even any wells — we have to get water delivered by a water truck every week or two into a 10,000 gallon tank that is on our property.

"Even though Malibu has hundreds of thousands of thousands of tourists every year, everyone is on septic, which clearly isn't working well because there are millions of gallons of sewage being spewed into the ocean every year. The environmentalists won't allow for a proper fix because a new water treatment plant might damage the environment (as if all that sewage doesn't).

"Also, because commercial development is so heavily discouraged, there are few basic services offered here so we all have to drive a half hour to get anything other than groceries, gas or the bank. I have a flat tire — there is one gas station that fixes them 20 miles away. It seems to me that it would be more environmentally sound if we all didn't have to drive so far to get anything.

"I felt almost like I moved to a Third World country. Well, not that bad, but compared to northern California, this 'sophisticated society' is way behind the curve. There is virtually no cell coverage.

"No place in this antiquated town is handicapped accessible although it's a federal law. I guess Malibu is above the law, kind of like Congress, the White House and the unions exempted from the health care coverage being foisted on the rest of us slobs."

Phyllis Roche


Rules of Conduct

  • 1 Use your real name. You must register with your full first and last name before you can comment. (And don’t pretend you’re someone else.)
  • 2 Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually oriented language.
  • 3 Don’t threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
  • 4 Be truthful. Don't lie about anyone or anything. Don't post unsubstantiated allegations, rumors or gossip that could harm the reputation of a person, company or organization.
  • 5 Be nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
  • 6 Stay on topic. Make sure your comments are about the story. Don’t insult each other.
  • 7 Tell us if the discussion is getting out of hand. Use the ‘Report’ link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
  • 8 Share what you know, and ask about what you don't.
  • 9 Don’t be a troll.
  • 10 Don’t reveal personal information about other commenters. You may reveal your own personal information, but we advise you not to do so.
  • 11 We reserve the right, at our discretion, to monitor, delete or choose not to post any comment. This may include removing or monitoring posts that we believe violate the spirit or letter of these rules, or that we otherwise determine at our discretion needs to be monitored, not posted, or deleted.

Welcome to the discussion.


  • posted at 7:45 am on Mon, May 3, 2010.


    Hoo boy. I love the hypocrisy of the right wingers who'll preach "personal responsibility" for everyone else other than themselves. Phyllis, didn't your friend bother to consider such basic quality-of-life details BEFORE purchasing such a property - a retirement property, no less? I suppose the onus of making an informed choice (or even factoring caveat emptor) can be easily excused by pointing the finger at them darned "environmental whackos" for their own buyers' remorse? Sheesh.

  • posted at 5:51 am on Mon, May 3, 2010.


    compared to malibu it appears that lodi is a fantastic pplace to live - despite all the protestations to the contrary

  • posted at 4:55 am on Mon, May 3, 2010.


    Why would someone move to a place they arent' happy in? There's lots of alternatives out there.


Recent Comments

Posted 13 hours ago by Thomas Heuer.

article: Editorial: Let’s take a deeper look at …

This has been a real silly argument. Hot, uncomfortable bleachers is not a tradition worth maintaining if you can't upgrade an already up…


Posted 14 hours ago by Simon Birch.

article: Letter: The path to Benghazi

Thomas: I was doing some work in the comments admin. Nothing sinister, although I'm sure someone will accuse me of conspiring with the Musl…


Posted 14 hours ago by Jerome Kinderman.

article: Letter: Questions for Obama supporters

Oh sure, it was real alright. But if one looks at the polls right now regarding Barack Hussein Obama's performance, me things there's a tad…


Posted 16 hours ago by stan taves.

article: Letter: Questions for Obama supporters

The load that the left bought -- but have yet to pay for -- is real. It's really real; but until you actually have to pay for it, you won't…


Posted 17 hours ago by Mike Adams.

article: Letter: Obama may be protecting his chi…

Hey, you're right about something! That picture didn't change my mind one bit.



Popular Stories



Mailing List

Subscribe to a mailing list to have daily news sent directly to your inbox.

  • Breaking News

    Would you like to receive breaking news alerts? Sign up now!

  • News Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily news headlines? Sign up now!

  • Sports Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily sports headlines? Sign up now!

Manage Your Lists