Lodinews.com

default avatar
Welcome to the site! Login or Signup below.
|
||
Logout|My Dashboard

Letter: City officials say the darndest things

Print
Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size

Posted: Tuesday, December 10, 2013 12:00 am

Eavesdropping on Lodi City Council backroom conversation:

City manager: “We need to raise the water and wastewater rates to pay for upgrades.”

Council member: “We can’t do that before an election.”

City manager: “We will do it gradually at 3 percent a year at least through 2019. That way it will appear minimal. I’ll have the city clerk put together some Prop. 218 nonsense and add hard-to-read charts. We will make it official-looking and label them exhibits. The hearing date will be at least a month from now during the holiday rush, so most will forget or not be able to attend. How does that sound?”

Council member: “Great. You have always done such a good job of not letting the public know what is going on. That’s the way we like it. By the way, good planning by setting the one leaf pickup date well beyond any leaves on the trees.”

Dave Hinchman

Lodi

Rules of Conduct

  • 1 Use your real name. You must register with your full first and last name before you can comment. (And don’t pretend you’re someone else.)
  • 2 Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually oriented language.
  • 3 Don’t threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
  • 4 Be truthful. Don't lie about anyone or anything. Don't post unsubstantiated allegations, rumors or gossip that could harm the reputation of a person, company or organization.
  • 5 Be nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
  • 6 Stay on topic. Make sure your comments are about the story. Don’t insult each other.
  • 7 Tell us if the discussion is getting out of hand. Use the ‘Report’ link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
  • 8 Share what you know, and ask about what you don't.
  • 9 Don’t be a troll.
  • 10 Don’t reveal personal information about other commenters. You may reveal your own personal information, but we advise you not to do so.
  • 11 We reserve the right, at our discretion, to monitor, delete or choose not to post any comment. This may include removing or monitoring posts that we believe violate the spirit or letter of these rules, or that we otherwise determine at our discretion needs to be monitored, not posted, or deleted.

Welcome to the discussion.

2 comments:

  • Ted Lauchland posted at 5:25 pm on Wed, Dec 11, 2013.

    Ted Lauchland Posts: 261

    Simply put , state mandates being passed on I am sure. Use it or lose it. Vineyards are being pushed as well.

     
  • roy bitz posted at 10:17 pm on Tue, Dec 10, 2013.

    roy bitz Posts: 502

    I have attended enough council meetings and lived in Lodi long enough to truly appreciate Mr. Henchman's letter.
    I love satire, as good satire always ties
    closely to reality. Mr. Henchman uses satire well here.

    Not so funny.

    I have always had a problem accepting the councils approval of the surface water treatment plant project and that the cost ( about two hundred million dollars over the life of the contract) was pushed down the throats of rate payers.

    Two points:

    1. This project was to be funded by major new development projects. Not current rate payers.

    2. This project was also said to be needed to reduce the ground water overdraft.

    Baloney! Baloney!

    New development has yet to happen or pay anything toward the cost of this plant.

    The new surface water treatment plant will do nothing to reduce the ground water overdraft. The plant may produce 6,000 afa while the overdraft is some 200,000 afa--- 3% of the over draft at best. One new vineyard offsets this amount.

    Three gentle councilmen-- Johnson, Hansen and Katzakian voted to force rate payers to pay----about five million dollars a year for the next forty years---( about two hundred million dollars totally) to fund the surface water treatment plant.
    Now they want to reach into ratepayers pocket again to pay for upgrades to the waste water treatment project. That's how our part time ---but well compensated elected volunteers roll!

    Please--Someone--- anyone -- tell me I am wrong regarding the TOTAL cost/benefit ( include all infrastructure costs and debt service, operations---everything) of this surface water treatment.


     

Recent Comments

Posted 10 hours ago by Ed Walters.

article: Letter: We care about animals, but what…

Kaur In your last sentence you state that it is better to bring a child into a world of misery rather than abort a child who cannot be pro…

More...

Posted 11 hours ago by Eric Barrow.

article: Letter: Immigrants must come to the U.…

Just as we get ready to celebrate the first illegal immigration the residents want to through us out Happy Thanksgiving Steve.

More...

Posted 13 hours ago by Steve Schmidt.

article: Letter: Immigrants must come to the U.…

As the descendant of native Americans I demand that illegal immigrants and their descendants be deported in the order in which they arrived…

More...

Posted 13 hours ago by Steve Schmidt.

article: Letter: We care about animals, but what…

If only Mr Amber Fields valued living women as much as he values fertilized eggs.

More...

Posted 13 hours ago by Eric Barrow.

article: Letter: We care about animals, but what…

The beauty of this country is that everybody gets to choose their God and people's actions in relation to their deity of choice is between …

More...

Video

Popular Stories

Poll

Loading…

Your News

News for the community, by the community.

Featured Events

CREATE AN EVENT

Mailing List

Subscribe to a mailing list to have daily news sent directly to your inbox.

  • Breaking News

    Would you like to receive breaking news alerts? Sign up now!

  • News Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily news headlines? Sign up now!

  • Sports Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily sports headlines? Sign up now!

Manage Your Lists