Lodinews.com

default avatar
Welcome to the site! Login or Signup below.
|
||
Logout|My Dashboard

Sharia Law is not good for America

Print
Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size

Posted: Tuesday, January 3, 2012 12:00 am | Updated: 6:15 am, Tue Jan 3, 2012.

I, like many of you, have been diligently striving to understand where Barack Obama is driving this nation. The findings are alarming. Obama is not just another bleeding-heart liberal, he is a full fledged Marxist! Look at his recent speech in Kansas. There is no doubt he is an activist socialist.

His foreign policy is a disaster. Obama will be remembered as the guy who allowed Iran to get "the bomb," just as Jimmy Carter was the guy who gave us the "Ayatollahs."

Now, the plot thickens. If you folks have not researched "Sharia," you must do so. This is really bad stuff. Ladies out there, you better get interested. Many perils await if you allow Islam to displace freedom and equality. Notice I said "Islam," not "Muslim." Obama was raised as a Muslim. Did he buy into "Islamism" as well as "Marxism"?

It is essential that we answer that question before the next election!

Jerry Osgood

Galt

Rules of Conduct

  • 1 Use your real name. You must register with your full first and last name before you can comment. (And don’t pretend you’re someone else.)
  • 2 Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually oriented language.
  • 3 Don’t threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
  • 4 Be truthful. Don't lie about anyone or anything. Don't post unsubstantiated allegations, rumors or gossip that could harm the reputation of a person, company or organization.
  • 5 Be nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
  • 6 Stay on topic. Make sure your comments are about the story. Don’t insult each other.
  • 7 Tell us if the discussion is getting out of hand. Use the ‘Report’ link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
  • 8 Share what you know, and ask about what you don't.
  • 9 Don’t be a troll.
  • 10 Don’t reveal personal information about other commenters. You may reveal your own personal information, but we advise you not to do so.
  • 11 We reserve the right, at our discretion, to monitor, delete or choose not to post any comment. This may include removing or monitoring posts that we believe violate the spirit or letter of these rules, or that we otherwise determine at our discretion needs to be monitored, not posted, or deleted.

Welcome to the discussion.

59 comments:

  • Darrell Baumbach posted at 12:28 pm on Wed, Jan 11, 2012.

    Darrell Baumbach Posts: 9405

    Ms Bobin made a claim that our consstitution would protect us from Shia Law... now her claim is down right foolish.

    Federal court blocks Oklahoma ban on Sharia law

    Published January 11, 2012
    | Associated Press

    The court in Denver upheld U.S. District Judge Vicki Miles-LaGrange's order blocking implementation of the amendment shortly after it was approved by 70 percent of Oklahoma voters in November 2010.

    Muneer Awad, the executive director of the Council on American-Islamic Relations in Oklahoma, sued to block the law from taking effect, arguing that the Save Our State Amendment violated his First Amendment rights.


     
  • Brian Dockter posted at 7:32 am on Mon, Jan 9, 2012.

    Brian Dockter Posts: 2850

    Daniel,

    Newton's laws of motion can't tell the difference between a military plane and a commercial plane.

     
  • daniel hutchins posted at 12:32 pm on Sun, Jan 8, 2012.

    daniel hutchins Posts: 1339

    Darrell: Addendum: Did you see Mark explode when I stated that he was retired? It goes without saying that the retirement was forced, for an NASA employee who doesn't know Newton's laws of motion, and lacks fundamental engineering common sense. Nevertheless, Mark considered himself qualified to criticize my engineering summary analysis of the collapse of the WTC.

     
  • daniel hutchins posted at 12:29 pm on Sun, Jan 8, 2012.

    daniel hutchins Posts: 1339

    Darrell: Haven't you ever seen me tell jokes in here before?

    Mark left the scene. I was having a lot of fun with him, especially when he wrote an opposing letter, and after he demonstrated that he didn't even know a fundamental law of physics, he informed me that he worked at a NASA flight research center down in the Mojave Desert. (Dresden?) How can someone know flight, and not know Sir Isaac Newton's Second Law of Motion?

    Steve writes with the wrong homonyms or homophones, and I always help him with his English.

    Jerome's grammar has improved improved since I recommended that he go to Delta College to learn English grammar.

    Next, I will be telling Jerome that all of his public servants in Washington are looking out for his best interest, even after his US Dollar collapses.

     
  • Darrell Baumbach posted at 7:25 am on Sat, Jan 7, 2012.

    Darrell Baumbach Posts: 9405

    Daniel... I was attempting to be more light and add humor.. I was trying to make things less serious... If you really did laugh... I succeeded in my intent...

     
  • daniel hutchins posted at 11:40 pm on Fri, Jan 6, 2012.

    daniel hutchins Posts: 1339

    Darrell: I am busting out laughing.

    I thought I looked up homophone just 2 days ago, and I thought I got it.

    Are you telling me that it is a new word, or are you joking with me?

     
  • daniel hutchins posted at 6:22 pm on Fri, Jan 6, 2012.

    daniel hutchins Posts: 1339

    woops. wrong letter to the editor.

     
  • daniel hutchins posted at 6:19 pm on Fri, Jan 6, 2012.

    daniel hutchins Posts: 1339

    Jerome, I am not trying to offend you in any way. I am just trying to be helpful.

     
  • Darrell Baumbach posted at 6:44 am on Fri, Jan 6, 2012.

    Darrell Baumbach Posts: 9405

    No Daniel... this was a word used in the movie "ET".. when he wanted to phone home .

    H.O.M.O. was the planet he "ET"had flown from. He was home sick and wanted to call his mother who resided on this planet... thus Hollywood word “Homophone” was born.

    This is common knowledge and is illustrated in Wikipedia under ET phone home.

     
  • daniel hutchins posted at 11:05 pm on Thu, Jan 5, 2012.

    daniel hutchins Posts: 1339

    "Homophone": Is that a fear of homosexuals?

     
  • Darrell Baumbach posted at 11:13 am on Thu, Jan 5, 2012.

    Darrell Baumbach Posts: 9405

    daniel hutchins posted at 11:37 pm on Wed, Jan 4, 2012...Who cares if Darrell is +5 authoritarian or not?

    Good point daniel... I certainly do not care... seems like a useless comment that Steve posted.

     
  • daniel hutchins posted at 10:47 am on Thu, Jan 5, 2012.

    daniel hutchins Posts: 1339

    Steve, reading past your incorrect homophone, otherwise that is pretty good.

     
  • daniel hutchins posted at 10:45 am on Thu, Jan 5, 2012.

    daniel hutchins Posts: 1339

    Alex Kennedy: Agony agony. I made a mistake.

    Thank you for correcting me.

    Homophone not homonym.

    I guess I can't be an English teacher.

     
  • Brian Dockter posted at 8:20 am on Thu, Jan 5, 2012.

    Brian Dockter Posts: 2850

    No one can be both, Steve? This falls on deaf ears with most people because there will always be the need for necessary evils via non-evil people.

     
  • Brian Dockter posted at 7:33 am on Thu, Jan 5, 2012.

    Brian Dockter Posts: 2850

    Actually Steve.

    It's the political element of Islam Mohammed strived to advance in order for Islam to succeed once he figured out the religious element was not going to work to convert people to Islam. Look it up. And your analogy with water and gas, well, they apply here.
    They aren't interchangeable.

     
  • Brian Dockter posted at 7:19 am on Thu, Jan 5, 2012.

    Brian Dockter Posts: 2850

    Darrell,

    Haven't you figured it out yet? Steve wants to make sure we know the difference between an Al Qaeda operative from Yemen and one from Libya. They aren't interchangeable. :)

     
  • Brian Dockter posted at 7:14 am on Thu, Jan 5, 2012.

    Brian Dockter Posts: 2850

    Steve wrote:

    What's their to discuss Darrell? Sharia Law? I'm against it, all of it whether its being pushed by some Islamic Mullah in Scumbagistan or some Christian televangelist in Talibama.

    -Here it's hard to tell whether Steve is serious or being sarcastic when he brings up the Christian televangelist.

     
  • Brian Dockter posted at 7:10 am on Thu, Jan 5, 2012.

    Brian Dockter Posts: 2850

    Steve wrote:

    You, on the other hand, just play one side. What good does it do to claim that you oppose Sharia when you yourself are actively working to establish a theocracy right here in the United States?

    -It's hard to tell when Steve is serious. This is why it's so hard to have a conversation with him.

     
  • Darrell Baumbach posted at 6:05 am on Thu, Jan 5, 2012.

    Darrell Baumbach Posts: 9405

    Steve stated...What's their to discuss Darrell? Sharia Law? I'm against it...

    Odd question...being against it but doing nothing about it or taking steps to prevent it is what the discussion should be about. So if you are against it... you must have been in favor of the Oklahoma law...right? One might wonder why a Muslim organization in United States would spend so much money to preserve the posibility of Sharia law in USA...

    The state of Oklahoma decided to take preventive measures and enacted legislation to ban it from their courts. Immediately, Muneer Awad, executive director of the Oklahoma Chapter of the Council for American-Islamic Relations, filed suit in federal court to overturn. The measure bans the use of Sharia and international law in deciding cases in state courts.

     
  • Alex Kennedy posted at 1:09 am on Thu, Jan 5, 2012.

    Alex Posts: 215

    Homophone not homonym

     
  • daniel hutchins posted at 11:37 pm on Wed, Jan 4, 2012.

    daniel hutchins Posts: 1339

    I guess I should consider being a school teacher.

     
  • daniel hutchins posted at 11:37 pm on Wed, Jan 4, 2012.

    daniel hutchins Posts: 1339

    Steve, "there," "their," and "they're" are homonyms.

    "there" refers to a place.
    "their" is ownership.

    You aren't going to learn your homonyms by wasting your energy arguing with Darrell.

    Who cares if Darrell is +5 authoritarian or not?

     
  • Steve Schmidt posted at 9:28 pm on Wed, Jan 4, 2012.

    Steve Schmidt Posts: 2572

    What's their to discuss Darrell? Sharia Law? I'm against it, all of it whether its being pushed by some Islamic Mullah in Scumbagistan or some Christian televangelist in Talibama.

    You, on the other hand, just play one side. What good does it do to claim that you oppose Sharia when you yourself are actively working to establish a theocracy right here in the United States?

     
  • Darrell Baumbach posted at 7:47 pm on Wed, Jan 4, 2012.

    Darrell Baumbach Posts: 9405

    Nice try Steve... but no angel or devil anywhere near me... I rely on thinking for myself.
    Since waiting for you to actually discuss the topic... "Sharia"

     
  • daniel hutchins posted at 7:40 pm on Wed, Jan 4, 2012.

    daniel hutchins Posts: 1339

    Problem is that people are arguing.
    This issue can be discussed without name-calling.

    I'm not trying to be grammar school recess teacher.

    The point is that when people are divided, somebody above is laughing at the people who are arguing, and they continue to advance their agenda.

     
  • Steve Schmidt posted at 6:17 pm on Wed, Jan 4, 2012.

    Steve Schmidt Posts: 2572

    Chuckle.... Darrell, given your performance in this arena, I have no doubt that you do, in fact, have a devil on your shoulder. What you are lacking, my friend, is an angel on the other shoulder.

     
  • Steve Schmidt posted at 6:11 pm on Wed, Jan 4, 2012.

    Steve Schmidt Posts: 2572

    I'm guessing you are at least +5 authoritarian.

     
  • Steve Schmidt posted at 6:10 pm on Wed, Jan 4, 2012.

    Steve Schmidt Posts: 2572

    If you want a better understanding of what I am talking about, try taking the test at the following site:

    http://www.politicalcompass.org/test

    I would be very interested to hear your results. In the interest of disclosure, I come up as Economic Left/Right: -5.88, Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -7.03.

     
  • Steve Schmidt posted at 5:58 pm on Wed, Jan 4, 2012.

    Steve Schmidt Posts: 2572

    Brian, fascism and communism are the opposite poles of authoritarianism. The very values and beliefs that make someone a conservative (in the modern sense) preclude them from being a communist just as the values and beliefs that make someone a liberal preclude them from being a fascist. It might be that someone who falsely professes the values of a conservative could be a communist or that someone who falsely professes the values of a liberal could, in reality, be a fascist but no one can be both.

     
  • Brian Dockter posted at 5:53 pm on Wed, Jan 4, 2012.

    Brian Dockter Posts: 2850

    Steve, I will ask again. Why does it matter to you if they are interchangeable or not?
    They are both totalitarian in nature. This doesn't seem to be an issue with you. Why?

     
  • Brian Dockter posted at 5:43 pm on Wed, Jan 4, 2012.

    Brian Dockter Posts: 2850

    Steve,
    Your point?

    The similarities between fascism and other forms of leftist governments (as stated) are:

    Totalitarian government
    State control of production
    Limited personal freedom
    The exaltation of the state over the individual
    supremacy of a single entity as leader (fuhrer or party)

    unstated similarities:

    Professed longevity (1000 yr Reich vs stateless society)

    Similarities in practice are

    slave labor (poles/gypsys/jews and prisoners/gypsys/jews)
    suspension of personal property
    widespread use of state sponsored propaganda
    subjugation/elimination of religion
    deficit spending
    use of large public works projects for job creation

     
  • Darrell Baumbach posted at 5:40 pm on Wed, Jan 4, 2012.

    Darrell Baumbach Posts: 9405

    I am so thankful I do not have the devil on my shoulder as Steve does... by looking at most of his posts, it appears the devil is winning most of the arguments...

    Interesting how the topic of Sharia which has significance is shifted by Steve and others to something irrelevant.
    What would be interesting is for someone to explain why the mass migration of people who embrace Sharia Law will not influence our legal system that is based on common law.
    If it can happen to France and Canada, why can it not happen in America?

     
  • Steve Schmidt posted at 3:58 pm on Wed, Jan 4, 2012.

    Steve Schmidt Posts: 2572

    The angel on my left shoulder is demanding that I tell Brian not to put water in his gas tank but the devil on my right shoulder is reminding me that we will all be safer without Brian on the road.

     
  • Steve Schmidt posted at 3:56 pm on Wed, Jan 4, 2012.

    Steve Schmidt Posts: 2572

    Has anyone else ever posted something and then immediately realized that your post was completely inappropriate for your audience? It is in that spirit that I say the following:

    CAUTION! CAUTION! CAUTION! CAUTION!

    BRIAN, WHATEVER YOU DO, DO NOT USE GASOLINE IN THE MANNER THAT YOU WOULD NORMALLY USE WATER. DO NOT BATHE IN GASOLINE. DO NOT WASH YOUR FACE WITH GASOLINE. DO NOT WATER YOUR HOUSEPLANTS WITH GASOLINE AND, FOR GODS SAKE, DO NOT TRY TO PUT OUT A FIRE WITH GASOLINE!!!!!!

     
  • Steve Schmidt posted at 3:46 pm on Wed, Jan 4, 2012.

    Steve Schmidt Posts: 2572

    Bria wrote: "Even though I don't know all the differences between communism and fascism, I do know they are both totalitarian in nature. Can they be used interchangeably? "

    Brian, water and gasoline are both wet. I encourage you to use them interchangeably.

     
  • Brian Dockter posted at 7:48 am on Wed, Jan 4, 2012.

    Brian Dockter Posts: 2850

    Steve,

    Thank you for breaking things up with your usual injection of sarcasm. Even though I don't know all the differences between communism and fascism, I do know they are both totalitarian in nature. Can they be used interchangeably? Well, why does this matter. All I know is they rely on a strong central governing body. And, they both rely on
    the least amount or no influence by the church. This doesn't necessarily mean the person or people running the show are atheists,per se. But it does help advance their agenda that a society can exist without a God or Godliness. Saddam is an example of someone who was not an atheist who succeeded in running a Secular Totalitarian government.

     
  • Darrell Baumbach posted at 5:22 am on Wed, Jan 4, 2012.

    Darrell Baumbach Posts: 9405

    Brian, you are wasting your time attempting to share truth with these folks as it relates to Sharia Law. They cannot possibly comprehend the ease at which it can develop in United Stated. These same people would refuse to believe that an Asian flu would effect people in United States as if they are immune because it originated in another country...even when they are sick in bed.

     
  • Steve Schmidt posted at 9:31 pm on Tue, Jan 3, 2012.

    Steve Schmidt Posts: 2572

    Alex,you are wasting your time trying to talk sense to these folks. Brian doesn't even know the difference between fascist and communist, he seems to think that they can be used interchangeably.

     
  • Darrell Baumbach posted at 8:34 pm on Tue, Jan 3, 2012.

    Darrell Baumbach Posts: 9405

    Jeff Tillett posted at 1:14 pm on Tue, Jan 3, 2012... Duel Legal system... More awesomeness. Sabres or pistols? 20 paces?

    No Jeff, everyone knows that 30 paces is standard.

    Obviously, you think like a teacher that focuses on insignificant thought and details and avoid participating in any meaningful way.
    I understand that teachers like yourself do not understand the logic of offering substance to your posts, but maybe if you tried, you might be able to express a thought. I know it will hurt, but eventually the pain will dissipate. Good luck Jeff!!... I know you can do it

     
  • Brian Dockter posted at 7:09 pm on Tue, Jan 3, 2012.

    Brian Dockter Posts: 2850

    Kim,

    Thanks for your input. But I have to warn you. Alex is not the least bit interested in these present day Crusaders in Dearborn fighting the good fight against Radical Islam.

     
  • Brian Dockter posted at 6:46 pm on Tue, Jan 3, 2012.

    Brian Dockter Posts: 2850

    Alex wrote:

    Docktor, we already discussed the disgusting bias of all the sites you mentioned. They are a kin to the distortion, propaganda, and blatant lies used in prewar Germany.

    -Alex,

    You're all over the place. Now you're accusing these people of advancing Propaganda like Hitler did. Do us all a favor and lay off the weed.

     
  • Brian Dockter posted at 6:41 pm on Tue, Jan 3, 2012.

    Brian Dockter Posts: 2850

    Alex wrote:

    Imbeciles. First of all atheism is the cornerstone of communism/Marxism.

    -Alex,
    would it make you feel better if we called Obama a Fascist? Another form of Totalitarianism. Or do you believe all forms of Totalitarianism require one to be an atheist? Frankly Sir, I think you should just bow out of this discussion while you have SOME credibility left. Oh I suppose you'll find some way to proove the Ayatollahs and Amadinejad cannot possibly be Totalitarians because they are religious.

     
  • Kim Parigoris posted at 6:29 pm on Tue, Jan 3, 2012.

    Kim Parigoris Posts: 470

    I myself did not quite understand how Sharia law would work, but it was explained to me by a friend who was raised a Muslim, travels extensively in Europe, and whose parents are still practicing Muslims...If a district, town, whatever, adopts Sharia law, anyone who is in that district comes under that law. If you are an American citizen and you commit a crime in that Sharia district your punishment is according to Sharia law, and it won;t be pretty. He also warns emphatically about the threat of the twisted Islam and has taught me quite a bit about the origins of the religion, how they converted people in Persia (convert or lose your head- they would line people up and go from one person to the next and they who did not "convert" lost their heads right then and there) and had the Crusades not occurred it would have engulfed the entire world.

     
  • Brian Dockter posted at 6:18 pm on Tue, Jan 3, 2012.

    Brian Dockter Posts: 2850

    Alex wrote:

    ." For Pete's sake the video poster was called Knights Crusaders. Knights as in KKK and Crusaders as in we are going to take away your land because as Christians we are entitled to it. You are a joke Docktor.

    -Chuckle,

    I will give you the benefit of the doubt you are right these Knights Crusaders are somehow connected to the KKK. But you need not worry. They don't have near the financial backing as the Muslims do in Dearborn. That being said, I will also give you the benefit of the doubt you are confident Islamic Law will eventually be the victor there.

     
  • Brian Dockter posted at 6:10 pm on Tue, Jan 3, 2012.

    Brian Dockter Posts: 2850

    Alex,

    Your name calling. personal attacks,and how you ignore the facts about how Sharia Law is quite prevalent throughout the world reveals how IGNORANT YOU ARE. And not to mention how you don't have a problem with those who require one be biased towards Sharia Law if they intend on leading a somewhat normal life in an Islamic country or in Dearbor,MI. It seems to me you believe the KKK also wants to take over the world and they have a political system more oppressive than Sharia Law.Have you checked lately how many people belong to the KKK? I think you need to take a look at how moronic you sound before you pass judgement on others, Mr!

     
  • Alex Kennedy posted at 3:45 pm on Tue, Jan 3, 2012.

    Alex Posts: 215


    Docktor, we already discussed the disgusting bias of all the sites you mentioned. They are a kin to the distortion, propaganda, and blatant lies used in prewar Germany. Find more reputable sources to back up your feelings of hate. The video link you posted was weak. It showed that some private muslim citizens refused to answer questions from, and did not appreciate being videotaped by confrontational and disruptive Christian youth as is their right. It then shows private security, not cops, escorting the "persecuted Christian" away from the other private booths. How is this representative of Sharia law? It's not,  you are just a hate monger which is the real "antithesis of democracy." For Pete's sake the video poster was called Knights Crusaders. Knights as in KKK and Crusaders as in we are going to take away your land because as Christians we are entitled to it. You are a joke Docktor.

     
  • Alex Kennedy posted at 3:37 pm on Tue, Jan 3, 2012.

    Alex Posts: 215

    Osgood, Obama's foreign policy achievements include almost completely toppling al Qaeda. If he is so ineffective at keeping the US safe, how come we have not had a major terrorist attack on his watch. We got hit really big under Bush.

    Also Osgood, where was your outrage when Bush "allowed" North Korea "to get the bomb?" The Ils are a lot crazier than Ahmadinejad who really has no power.

     
  • Jeff Tillett posted at 1:14 pm on Tue, Jan 3, 2012.

    Jeff Tillett Posts: 551

    Duel Legal system... More awesomeness. Sabres or pistols? 20 paces?

     
  • Darrell Baumbach posted at 12:32 pm on Tue, Jan 3, 2012.

    Darrell Baumbach Posts: 9405

    Mr Vandelay stated...Sadly, this country will fall under "Christian conservative law" long before Jerry's insane, conspiracy-theorist scenario ever happens.

    If Mr Vandelay simply spent one hour in research, he would understand how ignorant he appears.

    The Islamic legal system of Sharia (Islamic law) and Fiqh (Islamic jurisprudence) is one of the three most common legal systems in the world alongside common law and civil law.
    This is not conspiracy or looney toons as Mr Vandelay suggests. In fact, Sharia Law is dominant worldwide in many countries. France even tolerates in in a duel legal system...Conspiracy????
    Islamic Sharia law (and Fiqh jurisprudence) is based on legal precedent and reasoning by analogy and is thus considered similar to common law. Common Law is currently in practice in United States.
    If we are not careful, it is “LIKELY” that Sharia Law will evolve in United States in the next 50 years by design and ease within common law.

     
  • Arthur Vandelay posted at 10:43 am on Tue, Jan 3, 2012.

    Arthur Vandelay Posts: 32

    Sadly, this country will fall under "Christian conservative law" long before Jerry's insane, conspiracy-theorist scenario ever happens.

    Also: "Many perils await if you allow Islam to displace freedom and equality." Hah! George Bush got a great start on displacing our freedoms and equality, and the current batch of Republicans and Tea Partiers did a fantastic job of picking up where he left off.

     
  • Jerry Bransom posted at 8:07 am on Tue, Jan 3, 2012.

    Jerry Bransom Posts: 363

    You are brilliant Mr. Osgood! Your AMAZING attention to truth and detail absolutely ties the President to the rise in Islam. Your avocation of more government involvement in the lives of Americans is right on target. We really need a Department of Homeland Religion. Let's give them a huge budget and re-write all the laws that are currently on the books regarding acts of violence. And we need to have you in charge of a committee to see that everyone is a good christian just like you! You can start your own Mutaween.

     
  • Brian Dockter posted at 7:51 am on Tue, Jan 3, 2012.

    Brian Dockter Posts: 2850

    Muslims attack Christians in Dearborn, MI


    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZaS0DeuySNg&feature=related

     
  • Brian Dockter posted at 7:26 am on Tue, Jan 3, 2012.

    Brian Dockter Posts: 2850


    November 13, 2011
    The Case for Banning Sharia Law in America
    By JanSuzanne Krasner
    The incompatibility of Islamic sharia law with secular courts stems from the underpinning of Islamism -- the unyielding union of the laws and punishments of the Qu'ran and Hadiths with the country's legal and political system. Sharia law is the legislation of these religious and criminal rules, which rejects America's constitutional secularism and legal penalties.

    The Qu'ran commands Muslims to change secular laws to conform to sharia, eventually establishing Islamic law worldwide. Islamic courts want their fatwas to supersede the civil and criminal laws, untying Muslims from civil secular courts.

    The facts reveal that in 2008, when the first sharia court was recognized in the U.K., within one year, over 85 recognized sharia courts were established within the U.K.'s Tribunal Court system. The problem with this rapidly spreading dogma is that several of these courts have issued some fatwas that are completely incompatible with British and European law.

    Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/2011/11/the_case_for_banning_sharia_law_in_america.html#ixzz1iPR8jXw3

     
  • Brian Dockter posted at 7:17 am on Tue, Jan 3, 2012.

    Brian Dockter Posts: 2850

    Politicalislam.com, jihadwatch.com,and shoebat.com are just a few places you can go to to find info on Sharia Law. Indeed Sharia Law is a mandatory element in order for Islamic Countries and societies to function properly. SL is the antithesis of democracy. And if one is in the finance world, Sharia Finance is one of the options now being offered here in America. My advice. Avoid it like the plague.

     
  • daniel hutchins posted at 4:45 am on Tue, Jan 3, 2012.

    daniel hutchins Posts: 1339

    On the question of Muslim vs. Islamic: The cabal welcomes all political influences as potential causes to divide the people.

    This is like Roe vs. Wade. The purpose is to argue, without any apparent intention of changing anything.

     
  • daniel hutchins posted at 4:41 am on Tue, Jan 3, 2012.

    daniel hutchins Posts: 1339

    Jerry,

    From where did you get this topic?

     
  • daniel hutchins posted at 4:38 am on Tue, Jan 3, 2012.

    daniel hutchins Posts: 1339

    By my limited knowledge on this subject, I hope that I am not confusing a particular sect within the Persian Gulf region with Sharia law. So I'll say that in the Persian Gulf, leaving open the question if this is Sharia law, if a woman who is not a virgin is attacked, the men will not accept a charges of rape. If she is a virgin, a man might escape charges some other way.

     
  • daniel hutchins posted at 4:33 am on Tue, Jan 3, 2012.

    daniel hutchins Posts: 1339

    Of relevance, in Australia, the Prime Minister (title???) declared that Sharia law shall not be enforced on her land, and there was a political standoff.

     
  • daniel hutchins posted at 4:32 am on Tue, Jan 3, 2012.

    daniel hutchins Posts: 1339

    Jerry, This is an excellent topic, but the imposition of Sharia law is not limited to the Obama Administration. I have heard that Sharia law is spreading in other places in the world.

    The arrival and imposition of Sharia law has taken advantage of popular public opinion that peoples' private spiritual beliefs shall not be in government.

    You are correct, that women would be wearing burkas and not allowed to walk down the street unless accompanied by a man. When I was in the Persian Gulf, I was told that the limitation of the number of wives that a man could have is 4, unless he can support a greater number.

     

Recent Comments

Posted 13 hours ago by Ed Walters.

article: Letter: We care about animals, but what…

Kaur In your last sentence you state that it is better to bring a child into a world of misery rather than abort a child who cannot be pro…

More...

Posted 13 hours ago by Eric Barrow.

article: Letter: Immigrants must come to the U.…

Just as we get ready to celebrate the first illegal immigration the residents want to through us out Happy Thanksgiving Steve.

More...

Posted 15 hours ago by Steve Schmidt.

article: Letter: Immigrants must come to the U.…

As the descendant of native Americans I demand that illegal immigrants and their descendants be deported in the order in which they arrived…

More...

Posted 15 hours ago by Steve Schmidt.

article: Letter: We care about animals, but what…

If only Mr Amber Fields valued living women as much as he values fertilized eggs.

More...

Posted 15 hours ago by Eric Barrow.

article: Letter: We care about animals, but what…

The beauty of this country is that everybody gets to choose their God and people's actions in relation to their deity of choice is between …

More...

Video

Popular Stories

Poll

Loading…

Your News

News for the community, by the community.

Featured Events

CREATE AN EVENT

Mailing List

Subscribe to a mailing list to have daily news sent directly to your inbox.

  • Breaking News

    Would you like to receive breaking news alerts? Sign up now!

  • News Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily news headlines? Sign up now!

  • Sports Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily sports headlines? Sign up now!

Manage Your Lists