Lodinews.com

default avatar
Welcome to the site! Login or Signup below.
|
||
Logout|My Dashboard

Letter: Police do have an ‘us versus them’ attitude

Print
Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size

Posted: Wednesday, February 12, 2014 12:00 am

Glen Dais hit the nail on the head in his Letter to the Editor, “We need better-trained professional police forces across the nation,” Feb. 6. The police do have an “us versus them” attitude. When I attended a police training course, an instructor, a veteran detective, began the class by establishing the ground rules and telling us that civilians are all a*******.

I commend the News-Sentinel for its continued reporting on this case. Although the articles are straightforward facts and not explicitly critical of police, you can read between the lines. For example, the investigation is run by fellow police. It is common knowledge that the police will not tell on each other.

A further example: I attended a college police training class. The instructor was incompetent. I wrote a letter to the administration about it. I found myself being investigated by the police officer with oversight on the program! As an aspiring police officer, I was expected to keep it all in-house. The rule, don’t snitch on a fellow officer, is being taught and enforced at the student level.

As to further evidence of bias in the investigation, the News-Sentinel reports that one of the agencies responsible for the investigation is the Lodi city attorney. Why, you might ask, since the city attorney has no particular competence in the area of police conduct? Answer: The City of Lodi has a serious bias against a finding of liability of its officers, which will cost the city a lot of money. How neutral will the city be as a player in the investigation?

Ed Brooks

Victor

Rules of Conduct

  • 1 Use your real name. You must register with your full first and last name before you can comment. (And don’t pretend you’re someone else.)
  • 2 Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually oriented language.
  • 3 Don’t threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
  • 4 Be truthful. Don't lie about anyone or anything. Don't post unsubstantiated allegations, rumors or gossip that could harm the reputation of a person, company or organization.
  • 5 Be nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
  • 6 Stay on topic. Make sure your comments are about the story. Don’t insult each other.
  • 7 Tell us if the discussion is getting out of hand. Use the ‘Report’ link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
  • 8 Share what you know, and ask about what you don't.
  • 9 Don’t be a troll.
  • 10 Don’t reveal personal information about other commenters. You may reveal your own personal information, but we advise you not to do so.
  • 11 We reserve the right, at our discretion, to monitor, delete or choose not to post any comment. This may include removing or monitoring posts that we believe violate the spirit or letter of these rules, or that we otherwise determine at our discretion needs to be monitored, not posted, or deleted.

Welcome to the discussion.

1 comment:

  • trista aquino posted at 11:57 am on Sun, Feb 16, 2014.

    trista aquino Posts: 98

    Yes the ones here in Lodi have that attitude for sure. Not only that but they act like their authority makes them above the law- matter of fact just the other night I was getting ready to cross an intersection when a cop sped right in front of me, running an obvious red light, he went straight then made a u-turn and came back, running the same red light but no longer speeding. No lights or sirens, no "hey sorry for almost running you over" nothing.
    A few years back we had a scanner for a little while and listened to them talk about a guy they wanted to arrest over by Central but so far they didn't have a reason to. This went on for a good minute and then an officer comes on telling the others to keep watching him and if they see him walking thru somebody's yard they can get him for prowling. Ugh Dirty!!!

     

Recent Comments

Posted 5 hours ago by Rick Houdack.

article: Letter: Darwin’s theory has never been …

Facts and truth are not the same thing to you, Kevin Paglia? Your deceptive quote-mining does a disservice to Sagan; the spirituality of wh…

More...

Posted 5 hours ago by M. Doyle.

article: Letter: Darwin’s theory has never been …

Science tries to give you knowledge, Kevin. Nothing more. You have to find meaning for yourself. You don't need science or religion to t…

More...

Posted 6 hours ago by Christina Welch.

article: Letter: Obama may be protecting his chi…

Treacy, my readings about the PRA absolutely confirm what you are saying. I doubt any "picture" will change that.

More...

Posted 6 hours ago by M. Doyle.

article: Letter: Darwin’s theory has never been …

Kevin, we need to clarify definitions and be honest about facts. Science is not a religion or a "belief system." To say that is…

More...

Posted 6 hours ago by Christina Welch.

article: Letter: Darwin’s theory has never been …

While I am more of a humanities gal myself, I do hear what you are saying, even if I'm not as enthusiastic. (I still have nightmares from …

More...

Video

Popular Stories

Poll

Loading…

Your News

News for the community, by the community.

Mailing List

Subscribe to a mailing list to have daily news sent directly to your inbox.

  • Breaking News

    Would you like to receive breaking news alerts? Sign up now!

  • News Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily news headlines? Sign up now!

  • Sports Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily sports headlines? Sign up now!

Manage Your Lists