default avatar
Welcome to the site! Login or Signup below.
Logout|My Dashboard

Choose our actions now based on what’s best for our future

Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size

Posted: Saturday, June 4, 2011 12:00 am | Updated: 6:20 am, Sat Jun 4, 2011.

I thoroughly agree with those persons who have written letters on two important matters that will both impact Lodi, although in different ways.

I have already spoken to Mayor Johnson about leaving Farmers and Merchants Bank to do business with Bank of the West or other financial institutions. F&M has proved itself to be a solid and growing institution which has served Lodi for 60 years. Why leave a good thing for a more unknown quantity just because the cost is a bit cheaper? As I said in my invocation the other night, what is expedient (even financially) is not always right.

The idea of covering up productive farmland on Harney Lane or anywhere else with concrete and asphalt for the sake of one big institution and a bunch more small stores is irresponsible and unproductive. Here again, expediently, the construction will provide jobs and some city income for the moment, but what then? How many empty lots are there already in the city? How many empty business places, including whole buildings, which have never been occupied?

Already, there is talk of stocking up on foodstuffs against future calamities of some sort. The severe storms, fires, droughts and other extreme disasters in the world will sooner or later affect all of us here. We will need all the arable land we can get. Some populations in the world are already starving or are (North Korea) predicted to do so soon.

We need to think more broadly and more responsibly about what we do. We are part of a vastly changing world, unfortunately not for the better, and we all need to wake up and see what's going on beyond our city's boundaries and act as responsibly as we can within those boundaries.

Gwinnett Mitchell Paden


Rules of Conduct

  • 1 Use your real name. You must register with your full first and last name before you can comment. (And don’t pretend you’re someone else.)
  • 2 Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually oriented language.
  • 3 Don’t threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
  • 4 Be truthful. Don't lie about anyone or anything. Don't post unsubstantiated allegations, rumors or gossip that could harm the reputation of a person, company or organization.
  • 5 Be nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
  • 6 Stay on topic. Make sure your comments are about the story. Don’t insult each other.
  • 7 Tell us if the discussion is getting out of hand. Use the ‘Report’ link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
  • 8 Share what you know, and ask about what you don't.
  • 9 Don’t be a troll.
  • 10 Don’t reveal personal information about other commenters. You may reveal your own personal information, but we advise you not to do so.
  • 11 We reserve the right, at our discretion, to monitor, delete or choose not to post any comment. This may include removing or monitoring posts that we believe violate the spirit or letter of these rules, or that we otherwise determine at our discretion needs to be monitored, not posted, or deleted.

Welcome to the discussion.


  • Doug Chaney posted at 10:48 pm on Mon, Jun 6, 2011.

    Doug Chaney Posts: 1232

    Mr. Schmidt, it's the same old city council pyramid scheme in livable, lovable Lodi!

  • Kevin Paglia posted at 11:53 am on Sat, Jun 4, 2011.

    Kevin Paglia Posts: 2106

    Steve, forcing businesses to buy existing locations that are bad for their business won't help anyone either.

    On the other hand, creating more jobs will increase not only tax revenue but increase the amount of disposable income in Lodi. The more disposable income the more small business owners can go back and build their businesses in the vacant commercial buildings.

    And I can understand your point and if all things were than same then I would agree with you, but things are not the same. Some areas get more traffic which makes them better suited for some businesses. In a tight economy new businesses need every chance they can get, forcing them to go to an low traffic area and say "you have to make it work here" does only one of two things, scares the potential new business away or sees them fail in a short amount of time anyway.

    I'd much rather see existing buildings filled with new, vibrant businesses. But that will not happen unless there is disposable income for people to spend at those businesses. That disposable income will only come from new developments.

  • Steve Schmidt posted at 11:32 am on Sat, Jun 4, 2011.

    Steve Schmidt Posts: 2672

    Kevin, look at the commercial vacancy rate in this town and then tell me how this development is going to create jobs. The developers are playing a shell game that creates sprawl on one end and blight on the other. The time has come for the people of Lodi to stand up and tell their government that they aren't going to be conned again.

  • Kevin Paglia posted at 7:12 am on Sat, Jun 4, 2011.

    Kevin Paglia Posts: 2106

    Hmmm, a strawberry field in which the owners are looking to get out of anyway (per a response from there daughter here on the blogs), a field by the way that is just a small part (3-5 acres?) of the weed filled plot of land, is more important than the creation of jobs in this economic environment.

    Here is a question: if it has been so important to you few people that this land stay a "ag producing" piece of American resource, then why did you buy it with your own money and turn it into such as the weeds got higher? Why are you not willing to spend your own money but ARE willing to cost people jobs for your conviction? Don't blame the city for trying to help those who need jobs.


Recent Comments

Posted 3 hours ago by Mike Adams.

article: Steve Hansen: Driving through the gaunt…

Traffic laws are not much of a deterrent since ticketing rarely occurs. Sure, those who get ticketed think it's a deterrent, but that war…


Posted 15 hours ago by Steve Schmidt.

article: Steve Hansen: Driving through the gaunt…

I would suggest suicide as a reasonable alternative to a trip to Phoenix. There are worse things than death and that flea pit is one of th…


Posted 15 hours ago by Steve Schmidt.

article: Steve Hansen: Driving through the gaunt…

Yup Brian. That would be never. I am a gun owner and a vocal supporter of the Second Amendment both here (on numerous threads) and in rea…


Posted 16 hours ago by robert maurer.

article: Steve Hansen: Driving through the gaunt…

It's OK if I do it , but if anyone who I think may be remotely conservative does this, then I'll really increase my post count by writing o…


Posted 19 hours ago by robert maurer.

article: Steve Hansen: Driving through the gaunt…

This stupidity is hilarious. Talk about unskilled at the most menial level,yet...



Popular Stories



Your News

News for the community, by the community.

Mailing List

Subscribe to a mailing list to have daily news sent directly to your inbox.

  • Breaking News

    Would you like to receive breaking news alerts? Sign up now!

  • News Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily news headlines? Sign up now!

  • Sports Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily sports headlines? Sign up now!

Manage Your Lists