Lodinews.com

default avatar
Welcome to the site! Login or Signup below.
|
||
Logout|My Dashboard

Tuberculosis screening bill turns into union labor bill

Print
Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size

Posted: Saturday, September 24, 2011 12:00 am | Updated: 7:00 am, Sat Sep 24, 2011.

One of the worst "gut and amend" bills created and railroaded through the California State Legislature during its shameful last week of the 2011 session was Senate Bill 922, a bill that crushes local government decisions concerning taxpayer-funded public works contracts.

At the direction of State Senate President pro Tempore Darrell Steinberg and Assembly Speaker John Perez, Senate Bill 922 changed from a bill about tuberculosis screening to a bill that gives unions greater control over taxpayer-funded construction.

The bill deprives local governments of their authority to enact and maintain "Fair and Open Competition" policies that ban requirements for cities and counties to sign union Project Labor Agreements.

Senate Bill 922 nullifies some of these local policies and also cuts off state funding for certain cities that have such policies.

For example, the bill cuts off state funding for construction in the city of Fresno. To preserve that funding, the Fresno City Council will be compelled to repeal its Fair and Open Competition policy, which has been in the city's municipal code since 2000.

Senate Bill 922 would nullify Stanislaus County's Fair and Open Competition policy and discourage San Joaquin or Fresno counties from enacting such a policy.

Senate Bill 922 is sponsored by the State Building and Construction Trades Council, an umbrella lobbying group for construction trade unions (such as the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers and the State Pipe Trades Council).

Fax Gov. Jerry Brown at 916-558-3160. Ask him to veto SB922.

Nicole Goehring

Government Affairs Director and Lodi resident

Rules of Conduct

  • 1 Use your real name. You must register with your full first and last name before you can comment. (And don’t pretend you’re someone else.)
  • 2 Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually oriented language.
  • 3 Don’t threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
  • 4 Be truthful. Don't lie about anyone or anything. Don't post unsubstantiated allegations, rumors or gossip that could harm the reputation of a person, company or organization.
  • 5 Be nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
  • 6 Stay on topic. Make sure your comments are about the story. Don’t insult each other.
  • 7 Tell us if the discussion is getting out of hand. Use the ‘Report’ link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
  • 8 Share what you know, and ask about what you don't.
  • 9 Don’t be a troll.
  • 10 Don’t reveal personal information about other commenters. You may reveal your own personal information, but we advise you not to do so.
  • 11 We reserve the right, at our discretion, to monitor, delete or choose not to post any comment. This may include removing or monitoring posts that we believe violate the spirit or letter of these rules, or that we otherwise determine at our discretion needs to be monitored, not posted, or deleted.

Welcome to the discussion.

2 comments:

  • Ron Werner posted at 11:56 am on Sun, Sep 25, 2011.

    Ron Werner Posts: 87

    Cal Trans saved $400 million on the new SF bay bridge by using Chinese materials
    and not paying the high cost of union made products.
    It's ok for the state to use low cost foreign labor but it requires local governments to use high cost union labor. What hypocrisy our democrat leaders are showing us.

    http://www.foxnews.com/us/2011/09/20/san-francisco-oakland-bay-bridge-controversially-made-in-china/

     
  • Darrell Baumbach posted at 6:31 am on Sat, Sep 24, 2011.

    Darrell Baumbach Posts: 9405

    One more anti-friendly anti-business nail in the California economic coffin. I would be
    very surprised if the godfather of unions (Brown) vetoed this bill. Democrats are rarely for freedom of choice. ( except when it comes to abortion)
    We will see.

     

Recent Comments

Posted 10 hours ago by Jien Kaur.

article: Letter: We should not look to governmen…

Mr Mork - do you have a real and true understand of the benefits to avail the unemploy in United States? You comments say a big no. May y…

More...

Posted 11 hours ago by Ed Walters.

article: Semi-truck hauling grapes overturns at …

Big rigs taking off ramps to fast equals ---- what else but an over turned big rig, plus a driver looking for another job. Slow down and a…

More...

Posted 12 hours ago by Kevin Paglia.

article: Letter: Thanks for the discussion on th…

M. I posted this down below but it may be buried in all the since comments. I showed your response on a biker page and the unanimous res…

More...

Posted 12 hours ago by Kevin Paglia.

article: Letter: Thanks for the discussion on th…

I showed your response on a biker page and the unanimous response was that you may have rode a bike, but most assuredly did NOT get it. A …

More...

Posted 13 hours ago by Eric Barrow.

article: Letter: We should not look to governmen…

Thanks Jien you do clear things up in regards to Darrell and his utopian view of the East.

More...

Video

Popular Stories

Poll

Loading…

Your News

News for the community, by the community.

Mailing List

Subscribe to a mailing list to have daily news sent directly to your inbox.

  • Breaking News

    Would you like to receive breaking news alerts? Sign up now!

  • News Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily news headlines? Sign up now!

  • Sports Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily sports headlines? Sign up now!

Manage Your Lists