Lodinews.com

default avatar
Welcome to the site! Login or Signup below.
|
||
Logout|My Dashboard

Cell phones, texting and driving is dangerous

Print
Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size

Posted: Monday, February 1, 2010 12:00 am

Talking and texting — a deadly combination when driving.

An alarming statistic: 6,000 people are killed annually as a direct result of cell phone and texting usage. The lack of driving focus caused by such usage impairs people so much that it becomes the equivalent of driving drunk or worse.

Recent research surveys also tell us that 71 percent of those surveyed not only admitted to cell phone and/or texting usage, but also boasted about their assumed ability to multi-task as a means to justify this usage. Scientific reality, however, tells us that we possess a trait called inattentive blindness, wherein the brain prohibits us from safely focusing on driving while engaged in another activity.

Yes, this is a dangerous game being played. So what's the point? Six thousand people killed annually is the point. They do not merely represent a statistic, but somebody's mother, father, sister, brother, grandparent, aunt, uncle, colleague or close friend — real people with real lives unnecessarily shortened.

Yes, this is a dangerous game being played. So what's the point? The point is that driving while engaged in cell phone usage or texting is against the law! Rational people usually understand that when a law needs to be enacted, common sense tells us to fall in line and obey it. However, the common widespread use of cell phones and texting by drivers is a contradiction to common sense, and a deadly compromise to public safety.

People expect overburdened police officers to carry the sole responsibility for law enforcement. They'll do their job. But will we do ours?

We all share responsibilities under the law to alert those we know of the deadly repercussions involved in this practice. To do nothing is to allow this dangerous game to be played. So what's the point? The privilege of operating a vehicle demands responsibility and an obligation for personal accountability to the state of California and our fellow citizens.

So, let's be fully focused at all times while driving. After all, wouldn't it be great to eliminate this dangerous game being played?

Ray Schramm

Rules of Conduct

  • 1 Use your real name. You must register with your full first and last name before you can comment. (And don't pretend you're someone else.)
  • 2 Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually oriented language.
  • 3 Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
  • 4 Be truthful. Don't lie about anyone or anything. Don't post unsubstantiated allegations, rumors or gossip that could harm the reputation of a person, company or organization.
  • 5 Be nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
  • 6 Stay on topic. Make sure your comments are about the story. Don't insult each other.
  • 7 Tell us if the discussion is getting out of hand. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
  • 8 Share what you know, and ask about what you don't.

Welcome to the discussion.

6 comments:

  • posted at 7:45 am on Mon, Feb 1, 2010.

    Posts:

    I will be making a trip using Hwy. 12 and 37, these roads are about as dangerous as any I have ever driven. I can only hope the person that is driving and using a cell or texting pays more attention to the road, other wise as physics tells us, no to objects of sold mass can occupy the same space at the same time, I do this to avoid divorce.

     
  • posted at 6:58 am on Mon, Feb 1, 2010.

    Posts:

    I like the fine for Big Rig drivers, 3000.00, sounds about right..

     
  • posted at 5:58 am on Mon, Feb 1, 2010.

    Posts:

    Equally alarming regarding the 6,000-death statistic is that the author failed to cite his source. In addition, he states that these deaths were the result of "cell phone usage and texting." If broken down, how many of these alleged 6,000 deaths can be attributed to just "texting?" And are the cell phone "usage" deaths including the act of punching in the numbers to make an outbound call? ("Dialing" really hasn't accurately defined what we do when placing a call for a long time now.)My point is how are all of these deaths to be accurately attributed? I don't think anyone would argue that placing calls and texting are inherently dangerous; anything that forces us to take our eyes off the road should be prevented.But merely having a conversation while driving is something that has been enjoyed since we've had automobiles. Yet are we to expect in the not too distant future that talking while driving will become illegal as well? Where will it end?The real point is there are many things that distract us while we drive our cars. We simply need to be vigilant behind the wheel.

     
  • posted at 12:42 am on Mon, Feb 1, 2010.

    Posts:

    I have had a chance to read some summaries of text messages that have been sent/or received. I can safely say after all is said and done, there is a lot that does not need to be said nor done.

     
  • posted at 12:34 am on Mon, Feb 1, 2010.

    Posts:

    BlkMagicWoman...He ought to.

     
  • posted at 9:34 pm on Sun, Jan 31, 2010.

    Posts:

    Thanks for the lecture, "Dad." Are you going to make us go to the backyard and fetch you a switch so you can give us a good whoopin' if you find us driving while texting after this?

     

Recent Comments

Posted 11 hours ago by Mike Adams.

article: Letter: Obama may be protecting his chi…

"Is CSPAN an "extreme conservative source" or "conspiracy website" Treacy?" So if CSPAN doesn't run any cove…

More...

Posted 11 hours ago by Andrew Liebich.

article: Letter: Obama may be protecting his chi…

Mohammad Elibiary's Twitter page is Mohammad Elibiary's Twitter page. Mohammad Elibiary's Twitter page is not an "unproven conspiracy …

More...

Posted 11 hours ago by Andrew Liebich.

article: Letter: Obama may be protecting his chi…

It was YOU who said Mohammad Elibiary's Twitter page was an "extreme conservative source" or "conspiracy website." It …

More...

Posted 12 hours ago by Christina Welch.

article: Letter: Why is the president ignoring t…

The difference is that we are openly speculating, not offering our thoughts as facts like you do with your nonsense.

More...

Posted 12 hours ago by Christina Welch.

article: Letter: Many states allow guns in schoo…

Mike, I don't think any of us need to look up AB1014. If it's between believing you or Andrew, I'm sure you are the much more reliable so…

More...

Video

Popular Stories

Poll

Loading…

Mailing List

Subscribe to a mailing list to have daily news sent directly to your inbox.

  • Breaking News

    Would you like to receive breaking news alerts? Sign up now!

  • News Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily news headlines? Sign up now!

  • Sports Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily sports headlines? Sign up now!

Manage Your Lists