Delta tunnels are economically and ecologically bad for California
-
Print
-
Create a hardcopy of this page
-
Font Size:
-
Default font size
-
Larger font size
Posted: Tuesday, August 21, 2012 12:00 am
|
Updated: 6:24 am, Tue Aug 21, 2012.
Delta tunnels are economically and ecologically bad for California
When I learned of Gov. Brown’s plan to divert Sacramento River water southward via two large pipelines, one 33 feet in diameter and the other 37 feet in diameter, 150 feet below the river bottom and 35 miles long, I was filled with dread and disbelief. The future of the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta and California looks grim if this plan is implemented. The water, fish, bird life, vegetation and people will be negatively impacted in a big way. This water diversion plan would sell out local Delta habitat for big money interests in central and southern California.
Our state will be on its way to ruin if these pipelines are laid. We already tap too much water from the Delta into two large existing canals filled to the brim flowing to central and southern California locations.
Salt water intrusion has been a big problem in the Delta for may years due to the current rate of water taken from the Delta and pumped into these two canals. The quality of the water in the Delta has already been degraded. If the water diversion tunnels are built, the amount of fresh water running down the Delta would be a fraction of its current flow, resulting in less water flowing and lower water quality.
Instead of more water diversion, we need more water regulation. We all need to use water conservatively in our homes, yards, gardens, farms and businesses, etc., in every way we can think of. Water diversion tunnels will encourage overuse and waste of this precious resource.
The cost of building and maintaining water diversion tunnels would be an enormous burden falling on the backs of all Californians now and for generations to come. Whatever construction estimate is agreed upon will only be a small fraction of the actual cost we pay.
The potential for devastating environmental damage during the course of construction and after completion would be a high risk. The Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta ecosystem and all living components within it would be negatively compromised.
The Sacramento River Diversion Tunnel is a bad idea economically and environmentally for everyone.
John Minnehan
Lodi
Posted in
Letters
on
Tuesday, August 21, 2012 12:00 am.
Updated: 6:24 am.
(%remaining%) Remaining
Thanks for visiting Lodinews.com. You're entitled to view 20 free articles every 30 days. You will see 10 articles for free before being asked to register, and then you can view 10 additional articles by registering or logging in. Then, if you enjoy our site and want full access, we'll ask you to purchase an affordable subscription.
(%remaining%) Remaining
Thanks for visiting Lodinews.com. You're entitled to view 20 free articles every 30 days, and you currently have (%remaining%) free articles remaining ((%remaining_reg%) before being asked to register and (%remaining_sub%) before being asked to subscribe). Then, if you enjoy our site and want full access, we'll ask you to purchase an affordable subscription.
(%remaining%) Remaining
Thanks for visiting Lodinews.com. You're entitled to view 20 free articles every 30 days, and you currently have (%remaining%) free articles remaining ((%remaining_reg%) before being asked to register and (%remaining_sub%) before being asked to subscribe). Then, if you enjoy our site and want full access, we'll ask you to purchase an affordable subscription.
(%remaining%) Remaining
Thanks for visiting Lodinews.com. You're entitled to view 20 free articles every 30 days, and you currently have (%remaining%) total free articles remaining ((%remaining_reg%) before being asked to register and (%remaining_sub%) before being asked to subscribe). Then, if you enjoy our site and want full access, we'll ask you to purchase an affordable subscription.
(%remaining%) Remaining
Thank you for reading Lodinews.com. You have viewed (%viewed%) of your 20 free pages in 30 days. Please login or register at this time and enjoy the next (%remaining%) articles free of charge. After your 20 free articles, we'll ask you to purchase an affordable subscription.
(%remaining%) Remaining
Thank you for reading Lodinews.com. Because you have already viewed this article, you may view it again as many times as you would like without subtracting from your remaining free article views.
(%remaining%) Remaining
Thank you for registering on Lodinews.com. You're entitled to view 20 articles for free every 30 days, and you currently have (%remaining%) remaining. Then, if you enjoy our site and want full access, we'll ask you to purchase an affordable subscription.
(%remaining%) Remaining
Thank you for reading Lodinews.com. You're entitled to view 20 articles for free every 30 days, and you currently have (%remaining%) remaining. Then, if you enjoy our site and want full access, we'll ask you to purchase an affordable subscription.
(%remaining%) Remaining
Thank you for reading Lodinews.com. You're entitled to view 20 articles for free every 30 days, and you currently have (%remaining%) remaining. Then, if you enjoy our site and want full access, we'll ask you to purchase an affordable subscription.
(%remaining%) Remaining
Thank you for reading Lodinews.com. You're entitled to view 20 articles for free every 30 days. This is your last free article this period. On your next article we'll ask you to purchase an affordable subscription.
(%remaining%) Remaining
Thank you for reading 20 free articles on our site. You can come back at the end of your 30-day period for another 20 free articles, or you can purchase a subscription at this time and continue to enjoy valuable local news and information. If you need help, please contact our office at 209-369-2761.
Rules of Conduct
Welcome to the discussion.
Or, use your linked account: