Lodinews.com

default avatar
Welcome to the site! Login or Signup below.
|
||
Logout|My Dashboard

Letter: Costs of Lodi City Council are not unreasonable

Print
Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size

Posted: Saturday, March 15, 2014 12:00 am

When I started to read the Lodi News-Sentinel’s two part article “The Cost of City Council,” I thought they had unveiled a “new city of Bell” development.

Much to my surprise, it turns out that our current council and recent past members were concerned about costs and voted to reduce reimbursed council members’ travel expenses. They are also under State of California cost control for the “stipend” they receive. In newspaper style, “$50,000 stipend for city council” got your attention! It’s actually slightly more than $10,000 per council member per year. When the minimum wage is raised to $10.10 an hour, our state may give them a raise.

Seems like the only issue that might be of significance is the medical benefits, which actually do not seem to be out of line when you consider the same situation in real world business. Some have families to cover, some are single, some are on Medicare, some have spouses that have their own benefits, etc. Therefore, the range in cost per person can vary considerably, but the council members’ benefits are not unrealistic nor are the amounts unreasonable.

According to Mr. Renison, as reported, there is no oversight of our council members’ spending, and no one screening the conferences they attend. I suggest that each member has different needs, as their education and personal experiences vastly differ. I cannot imagine the cost of having an individual do an interview with each council member to determine which conference would be appropriate, and then make all of the arrangements to keep the costs to an absolute minimum. Would this be cost effective?

Remember, according to the report, council members reduced their own expense allowance from $25,000 to a maximum total of $15,000 for all council members. I wonder how much Mr. Renison thinks could be saved with an added cost of an oversight committee and screener.

I’ve heard that a “trust but verify” policy is a valid method of running a business. It seems as though your report has just verified that we can trust our council members.

Perhaps a vote of confidence is in order.

Frank Kimbrell

Lod

Rules of Conduct

  • 1 Use your real name. You must register with your full first and last name before you can comment. (And don't pretend you're someone else.)
  • 2 Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually oriented language.
  • 3 Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
  • 4 Be truthful. Don't lie about anyone or anything. Don't post unsubstantiated allegations, rumors or gossip that could harm the reputation of a person, company or organization.
  • 5 Be nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
  • 6 Stay on topic. Make sure your comments are about the story. Don't insult each other.
  • 7 Tell us if the discussion is getting out of hand. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
  • 8 Share what you know, and ask about what you don't.

Welcome to the discussion.

5 comments:

  • Joe Baxter posted at 7:43 am on Wed, Mar 19, 2014.

    Joe Baxter Posts: 1835

    Bobbin, if all it takes is to be a taxpayer to merit FREE healthcare, then millions of people America should qualify. You have a job and are most likely financially able to pay for your healthcare but you choose to let taxpayers pick up the tab. I find it interesting that you look down on the council members who should/could afford to pay for their healthcare but conveniently exclude yourself. Bit of a double standard there?

     
  • Joe Baxter posted at 7:39 am on Wed, Mar 19, 2014.

    Joe Baxter Posts: 1835

    At least they are doing SOMETHING

     
  • Joanne Bobin posted at 1:08 pm on Tue, Mar 18, 2014.

    Joanne Bobin Posts: 4485

    Let's put it this way, Baxxter:

    JoAnne Mounce has a job that should provide her with healthcare benefits.

    Larry Hansen is retired from the COL and ALREADY gets retirement and healthcare - Ronald Reagan called that DOUBLE DIPPING and put a stop to it.

    Alan Nakanishi is self-employed (at least through his partnership at DEMG) and should already have healthcare.

    Phil Katzakian comes from a VERY wealth Lodi family and also works in private industry and should be able to afford his own healthcare many times over.

    Bob Johnson - seems he's always ready to volunteer for something or wants to be elected to something. He's on his own as far as I'm concerned.

    Beside - I AM A TAXPAYER. Why shouldn't I benefit from a program that MY FAMILY HAS PAID FOR and CONTINUES to pay for?

    Get over it, Baxxter.

     
  • Joe Baxter posted at 7:39 am on Tue, Mar 18, 2014.

    Joe Baxter Posts: 1835

    Oh, the irony. Someone complaining about taxpayers funding healthcare costs for the council members while receiving taxpayer funded healthcare costs.

     
  • Joanne Bobin posted at 9:33 am on Mon, Mar 17, 2014.

    Joanne Bobin Posts: 4485

    The money for all of these increasing city council costs - including health benefits and retirement contributions - has to come from somewhere.

    Witness increasing water and sewer rates. Ridiculously high power rates. And now COL is making it much more difficult for sick individuals - especially seniors - to qualify for the COL Medical Discount on electricity.

    Hope they enjoy all these perks at the expense of the citizens of this city - especially very ill people.

     

Recent Comments

Posted 17 hours ago by Mike Adams.

article: Letter: Obama may be protecting his chi…

"Is CSPAN an "extreme conservative source" or "conspiracy website" Treacy?" So if CSPAN doesn't run any cove…

More...

Posted 17 hours ago by Andrew Liebich.

article: Letter: Obama may be protecting his chi…

Mohammad Elibiary's Twitter page is Mohammad Elibiary's Twitter page. Mohammad Elibiary's Twitter page is not an "unproven conspiracy …

More...

Posted 18 hours ago by Andrew Liebich.

article: Letter: Obama may be protecting his chi…

It was YOU who said Mohammad Elibiary's Twitter page was an "extreme conservative source" or "conspiracy website." It …

More...

Posted 18 hours ago by Christina Welch.

article: Letter: Why is the president ignoring t…

The difference is that we are openly speculating, not offering our thoughts as facts like you do with your nonsense.

More...

Posted 18 hours ago by Christina Welch.

article: Letter: Many states allow guns in schoo…

Mike, I don't think any of us need to look up AB1014. If it's between believing you or Andrew, I'm sure you are the much more reliable so…

More...

Video

Popular Stories

Poll

Loading…

Mailing List

Subscribe to a mailing list to have daily news sent directly to your inbox.

  • Breaking News

    Would you like to receive breaking news alerts? Sign up now!

  • News Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily news headlines? Sign up now!

  • Sports Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily sports headlines? Sign up now!

Manage Your Lists