Lodinews.com

default avatar
Welcome to the site! Login or Signup below.
|
||
Logout|My Dashboard

Letter: There was no need for excessive force

Print
Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size

Posted: Saturday, February 1, 2014 12:00 am

The shooting death of Parminder Singh Shergill by our veteran police was senseless !

The deceased only had a knife, not a gun. The police were not in mortal danger of losing their lives. It doesn’t matter whether he was charging them or not. I’m sure either officer could have inflicted one shot to the foot or leg. This would have been enough to maim him long enough to get the knife away from him. There was no need to fire several shots and kill him.

My condolences go out to the family and friends of Mr. Shergill.

Barbara Portal

Lodi

Rules of Conduct

  • 1 Use your real name. You must register with your full first and last name before you can comment. (And don't pretend you're someone else.)
  • 2 Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually oriented language.
  • 3 Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
  • 4 Be truthful. Don't lie about anyone or anything. Don't post unsubstantiated allegations, rumors or gossip that could harm the reputation of a person, company or organization.
  • 5 Be nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
  • 6 Stay on topic. Make sure your comments are about the story. Don't insult each other.
  • 7 Tell us if the discussion is getting out of hand. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
  • 8 Share what you know, and ask about what you don't.

Welcome to the discussion.

6 comments:

  • Mike Adams posted at 5:25 pm on Sun, Feb 2, 2014.

    Mike Adams Posts: 1293

    Kevin: I don't think liability is the reason for "shooting to wound". Gunfire in a shootout is notoriously inaccurate. And the distance isn't the problem. Most officer involved shootings take place at 20' or less and involve few rounds fired (or used to). I bet the hit rate is somewhere around 4-5% of rounds fired. Just a little bit better than two battleships slugging it out (about 1-2%). If you were here in Dec. '83, a local officer stopped a person to tell him detectives wanted to talk to him. He wasn't arresting him or detaining him, just passing on the message. The guy whipped out a gun and started firering. The officer did to. Officer hit in the arm, had to pull a back up piece to drop the assailant. Point is, both emptied their guns and they were both not much farther from each other then you are to your computer screen.

    The shoot them in the leg thing would be fine unless you hit an artery. Or a nerve like the sciatic. Now you got either a dead guy or one that will never walk again.

    I do think in this case however, I would want to know how many shots were fired and why a taser wasn't deployed first. I"m not saying the police were at fault until all the facts come out.

    You should be suspicious as to why almost every single officer involved shooting comes back as a good shoot though. IE, the police were justified in every single case? My bet is this will come back good as well and knowing the caliber of LPD's officers, I would expect nothing less, but it's still food for thought though.

     
  • Mike Adams posted at 10:08 am on Sun, Feb 2, 2014.

    Mike Adams Posts: 1293

    " I’m sure either officer could have inflicted one shot to the foot or leg. "

    Sorry Ms. Portal. It doesn't work like that.

     
  • Will Rainwater posted at 8:58 pm on Sat, Feb 1, 2014.

    Will Rainwater Posts: 40

    No comments allowed I see.... way to go Rich!

     
  • Jerome Kinderman posted at 1:19 pm on Sat, Feb 1, 2014.

    Jerome R Kinderman Posts: 2301

    "It doesn't matter if he was charging them or not?" Actually it certainly DOES matter.

    Even in loveable, liveable Lodi, crime is a problem - even attacks against police officers. When they un-holster their weapons and take aim, just hurting the offender is not their first choice. For whatever reason, they must have felt to have been in "mortal danger" else they would not have fired off.

    In this day and age, when anyone takes on a cop with any kind of weapon they're either stupid or trying for suicide by cop.

     
  • Kevin Paglia posted at 10:24 am on Sat, Feb 1, 2014.

    Kevin Paglia Posts: 1902

    Officers can NOT shoot an attacker in the leg or foot cause they and the city will get sued. They "could" have used tasers, but there too police departments and cities are being sued for injuries sustained by taser usage.

    The attacker, according to police, had a knife. They WERE in mortal danger in that case. Knives are weapons that can inflict a lot of damage fast. Didn't mater if it was a rock, knife or club, if you attack, or make an aggressive charge at a police officer you stand a very good chance of being shot.

    Now, that said, it appears that there is some doubt as to what really happened and I will reserve judgment on this situation until the facts come out.

     
  • Will Rainwater posted at 9:22 am on Sat, Feb 1, 2014.

    Will Rainwater Posts: 40

    Maybe the Lodi Police Foundation should forget about raising money for a armored personnel carrier and start raising money for these officers criminal defense fund...

     

Recent Comments

Posted 5 hours ago by Thomas Heuer.

article: Letter: Advertisement was inappropriate

Andrew Please note I just returned from a week in Washington state (great fireworks) and upon return I caught up on emails and social media…

More...

Posted 5 hours ago by Andrew Liebich.

article: Letter: We need to stop meddling, spend…

Let's try this OK...[lol] Yes Christina, you are correct, "The president is supporting Al Nusra" a group that Obama's own State …

More...

Posted 6 hours ago by Jerome Kinderman.

article: Letter: Advertisement was inappropriate

Ms. Welch - first, the reason that there's a "reply" button on each comment is to keep separate conversations/debates together an…

More...

Posted 6 hours ago by Jerome Kinderman.

article: Letter: Advertisement was inappropriate

And the State of California voted to make marriage between one man and one woman. That was shot down by the Supreme Court as I am sure you …

More...

Posted 7 hours ago by Christina Welch.

article: Letter: Who’s keeping tabs on the water?

A very valid question, Ms Owens. I would expect to see a response from members of all three of the parties addressed in this letter. I do…

More...

Video

Popular Stories

Poll

Loading…

Mailing List

Subscribe to a mailing list to have daily news sent directly to your inbox.

  • Breaking News

    Would you like to receive breaking news alerts? Sign up now!

  • News Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily news headlines? Sign up now!

  • Sports Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily sports headlines? Sign up now!

Manage Your Lists