Lodinews.com

default avatar
Welcome to the site! Login or Signup below.
|
||
Logout|My Dashboard

Everyone shares in the blame for failures of the water district

Print
Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size

Posted: Saturday, June 30, 2012 12:00 am | Updated: 5:27 am, Sat Jun 30, 2012.

This is regarding the Record article on June 23 concerning the San Joaquin County Grand Jury Report on the North San Joaquin Water Conservation District being on the "brink of failure" because of its former leadership.

Exactly what former management do you mean? The NSJWCD has been in existence for over 50 years, and during that time has seen its share of dereliction and neglect, political manipulation and conflicts of interest.

It is disingenuous and wrong to try and lay the blame for the district's long-term woes on Bryan Pilkington, Hugh Scanlon and Marden Wilbur. There have been many contributors to NSJWCD's ills over the years — selfish agendas, political manipulation and self-aggrandizement by some, and certainly public apathy and citizen neglect to boot.

There is plenty of blame to go around and plenty of places to lay it and a lot of finger pointing. But when we are pointing our fingers at the other guy, there are always three more fingers pointing back at us.

There is a side of this story that isn't being told by the Grand Jury Report and Record article, and it's the side of long-term sins of "commission and omission," and we are all guilty for the good we didn't do.

William Van Amber Fields

Morada

Rules of Conduct

  • 1 Use your real name. You must register with your full first and last name before you can comment. (And don't pretend you're someone else.)
  • 2 Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually oriented language.
  • 3 Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
  • 4 Be truthful. Don't lie about anyone or anything. Don't post unsubstantiated allegations, rumors or gossip that could harm the reputation of a person, company or organization.
  • 5 Be nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
  • 6 Stay on topic. Make sure your comments are about the story. Don't insult each other.
  • 7 Tell us if the discussion is getting out of hand. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
  • 8 Share what you know, and ask about what you don't.
  • 9 Don’t be a troll.
  • 10 We reserve the right, at our discretion, to monitor, delete or choose not to post any comment. This may include removing or monitoring posts that we believe violate the spirit or letter of these rules, or that we otherwise determine at our discretion needs to be monitored, not posted, or deleted.

Welcome to the discussion.

1 comment:

  • Josh Morgan posted at 6:54 am on Sat, Jun 30, 2012.

    Josh Morgan Posts: 532

    William, it's called the 2011-12 Grand Jury Report, not the 1960- 2012 Report or the LNS Report. Here is the conclusion of the report:

    Conclusion

    "This Board has been dysfunctional and has not conducted the public's business according to theDistrict's Policy and the Ralph M. Brown Act. Minutes of each meeting as well as a current, balanced financial report should be available at the subsequent Board meeting for review and approval.

    The Board's behavior has placed the financial future and even the ability to survive as a District in jeopardy. The turmoil has cost the District thousands of dollars in legal and process fees. The District's inability to create effective solutions, to raise much needed revenue, and maintain its water rights remains unresolved.

    The Board Presidenthas since resigned. Due to a change of leadership, the overall conduct of the District has shown improvement. The current Board is attempting to follow District policies and regulations.

    The State of Califomia Fair Political Practice Commission is currently conducting an investigationof the alleged conflict of interest."

    You may be correct that there have been issues in the previous 49 years but this report addressed one year. And to my knowledge there had not been complaints filed with the Grand Jury the previous 49 years.

    Here is the link to the full Grand Jury Report:

    http://www.stocktoncourt.org/grandjury/2011/SJC_Grand_Jury_Final_Report_2011-2012.pdf

     

Recent Comments

Posted 3 hours ago by Mike Adams.

article: Letter: Many states allow guns in schoo…

nah.... I don't think so. When I click on "click here" on your post, still nothing happens. Maybe if you didn't copy it and pas…

More...

Posted 3 hours ago by Mike Adams.

article: Letter: There was a ‘stand down’ order …

Another wild fantastic story by another conspiracy theorist. We pretty much have the official version of what happened. Any further analy…

More...

Posted 3 hours ago by Mike Adams.

article: Letter: Obama may be protecting his chi…

Can we all agree that too much time is being spent on an unfounded claim by a conspiracy theorist regarding some sign being flashed on some…

More...

Posted 4 hours ago by Walter Chang.

article: Letter: There was a ‘stand down’ order …

"Upon confirmation that the ambassador was not kidnapped as planned..." Jien, this is an opinion page. I'm not even sure if le…

More...

Posted 4 hours ago by Simon Birch.

article: Letter: Obama may be protecting his chi…

Christina: There's a space between the slash and the long string of numbers. It might be a result of the text wrapping in the comment box. …

More...

Video

Popular Stories

Poll

Loading…

Mailing List

Subscribe to a mailing list to have daily news sent directly to your inbox.

  • Breaking News

    Would you like to receive breaking news alerts? Sign up now!

  • News Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily news headlines? Sign up now!

  • Sports Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily sports headlines? Sign up now!

Manage Your Lists