Lodinews.com

default avatar
Welcome to the site! Login or Signup below.
|
||
Logout|My Dashboard

Will maintenance be provided for the new firehouse?

Print
Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size

Posted: Wednesday, January 23, 2013 12:00 am

I suppose that Lodi Firehouse No. 2 was built without inspectors, since it was built with shabby workmanship and nobody seemed to notice. The repair on the firehouse was nonexistent — the roof leaked for 10 years, causing mold. Who is in charge?

I have no sympathy for the people who are in charge of seeing that these buildings are being maintained. How much effort was made to correct this situation? There was a vermin infestation for 10 years and nothing was done to exterminate them. Who inspected the roof of the firehouse to see if there was a problem? The answer is no one — otherwise light could not have been seen after the roof was fixed.

General Mills was built in 1948 and is still producing products. How many vermin infestations have they had during this time? The answer is none. It was taken care of by people interested in making money, not spending it.

If you are going to spend millions of dollars, and I assume taxpayer money, on construction you better have maintenance in place to take care of it. Who will be in command of maintenance — or do we take turns building a new firehouse every 25 years?

My house is 55 years old and without the problems you describe. Will building maintenance be provided? I personally don't think so, since this is not the first time this has happened with buildings in disrepair.

Ben Coleman

Lodi

Rules of Conduct

  • 1 Use your real name. You must register with your full first and last name before you can comment. (And don’t pretend you’re someone else.)
  • 2 Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually oriented language.
  • 3 Don’t threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
  • 4 Be truthful. Don't lie about anyone or anything. Don't post unsubstantiated allegations, rumors or gossip that could harm the reputation of a person, company or organization.
  • 5 Be nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
  • 6 Stay on topic. Make sure your comments are about the story. Don’t insult each other.
  • 7 Tell us if the discussion is getting out of hand. Use the ‘Report’ link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
  • 8 Share what you know, and ask about what you don't.
  • 9 Don’t be a troll.
  • 10 Don’t reveal personal information about other commenters. You may reveal your own personal information, but we advise you not to do so.
  • 11 We reserve the right, at our discretion, to monitor, delete or choose not to post any comment. This may include removing or monitoring posts that we believe violate the spirit or letter of these rules, or that we otherwise determine at our discretion needs to be monitored, not posted, or deleted.

Welcome to the discussion.

3 comments:

  • Doug Chaney posted at 9:49 am on Sat, Jan 26, 2013.

    advocate Posts: 499

    Mr. Bitz, do you think anyone but Mr. Geweke could get $400,000 for that blighted property in the drug, crime and gang controlled blighted area. And less than an accre? I think those estimates are for the same old off base engineer's estimates and probably geared for the same old local contractors that seem to pull in all the low bids in Lodi. I''m still anxiously awaiting those figures for the unnecessary and unneeded water treatment plant to see if and why that specific bond money was used for other publics works projects other than the plant. I noticed that street, curb and sidewalk and the water meter program installation was suspected of using $9 million of that bond money to lower the cost of meters for residents. I thought this bond funding was for the unnecessary and unneeded water treatment plant, but maybe I'm mistaken. City council will be holding one of their unattended and seemingly"secret" 7AM council metings to discuss the water issue, including costs and prices to be set. To me it's apparent they aren't interested in having any public attendance judging by the early time and assuming those with the normal 7AM-5PM working day, that few, if any, will take time off from work or their day to attend. The council seems to be aware of this fact as they continue to set importand public agenda items on that "secret" list and pass them while most are going to work or in bed ready to rise and complete their day. Does anyone know of any city council in the US that has 7AM meetings?

     
  • roy bitz posted at 9:26 pm on Thu, Jan 24, 2013.

    roy bitz Posts: 494

    Good letter Mr. Coleman.

    This council is into building monuments with rate payer money. I hope the Lodi News Sentinel will document all the costs and all the benefits of this boondoggle.
    The cost to demolish and dispose of the existing building--- the true final cost and all the benefits.

     
  • Joanne Bobin posted at 2:16 pm on Wed, Jan 23, 2013.

    Joanne Bobin Posts: 4485

    "Inspectors?"

    I wouldn't put an ounce of faith in COL building inspectors. I can show you an illegible signature from a COL inspector on a permit for my roof that, in reality, could not pass the inspection of a 5 year-old.

    I've sworn for years that the inspector simply did a drive-by and noted, "yeah, there's a roof on that house.'

     

Recent Comments

Posted 6 hours ago by Mike Adams.

article: Letter: Obama may be protecting his chi…

Excellent points Treacy, Christina, Thomas. Conspiracy theorists have a bottomless pit of intrigues and stories of mythical events perpetr…

More...

Posted 7 hours ago by Mike Adams.

article: Letter: Many states allow guns in schoo…

Thomas, More hyperbole......"proposed firearm seizure warrant". How riduculous. I don't know if you remember, but one conspiracy…

More...

Posted 7 hours ago by Mike Adams.

article: Letter: Many states allow guns in schoo…

How long have you been alive? You've been reading something for 25 years (by your own admission). You're not a member of the NRA, but ev…

More...

Posted 7 hours ago by Andrew Liebich.

article: Letter: Questions for Obama supporters

13 unanimous Supreme Court rulings against President Obama are not a "bogus insinuation" Mr. Heuer. Ignoring these 13 rulings si…

More...

Posted 8 hours ago by stan taves.

article: Letter: Questions for Obama supporters

...Interesting indeed. I guess that if there is one word that sums-up liberalism then it is "fairness". In other words, the lefti…

More...

Video

Popular Stories

Poll

Loading…

Mailing List

Subscribe to a mailing list to have daily news sent directly to your inbox.

  • Breaking News

    Would you like to receive breaking news alerts? Sign up now!

  • News Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily news headlines? Sign up now!

  • Sports Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily sports headlines? Sign up now!

Manage Your Lists