Lodinews.com

default avatar
Welcome to the site! Login or Signup below.
|
||
Logout|My Dashboard

Reimbursement changes coming to local health care

Print
Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size

Posted: Thursday, August 16, 2012 12:00 am | Updated: 6:07 am, Thu Aug 16, 2012.

Major reimbursement changes are finally coming to a local health care organization and payer near you.

I agree that the public is finally becoming aware of what Bruce Schweigerdt referred to as the health care cost fiasco ("Hospitals are enabling the 'charge' versus 'cost' game," Aug. 9). Excessive health care spending continues to overwhelm America's economy. However, I would caution using Medicost.org data as an example.

The website compares every California hospital that they could find — 260 in all. Their scale compares hospital cost per dollar with the highest at No. 1 (90 cents) to the lowest at No. 260 (10 cents). Lodi Memorial Hospital is ranked number 246. I choose to look at the LMH score as being roughly in the bottom third. This is great news when compared to other acute care organizations in the state.

Unraveling the complexity of health care provider charges and payments is extremely difficult. The real concerns should be the quality of care provided and the verifiable source by which it is measured. A nationwide database is available to us. It is called Hospital Compare (www.hospitalcompare.hhs.gov). Granted, this is a government database. LMH ranks ahead of or on-par with St. Joseph's and Kaiser. Clarification: LMH is a "nonprofit" corporation. Nonprofit corporations conduct business for the benefit of the general public without shareholders and without a profit motive.

I consider LMH our community health care resource. As health care reform plays out, I want to receive high quality health care provided locally versus having to go to Stockton, Manteca or Sacramento.

We might consider supporting our unique resource whose goal is to create superior health care delivery opportunities to enrich Lodi.

Health care reform, like it or not, is changing care delivery and reimbursement of health care services. If we are to continue enjoying the luxury of having a local acute care and emergency care provider, it will be up to us to engage and become part of the solution.

J. Mark Hamilton

Lodi

Rules of Conduct

  • 1 Use your real name. You must register with your full first and last name before you can comment. (And don’t pretend you’re someone else.)
  • 2 Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually oriented language.
  • 3 Don’t threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
  • 4 Be truthful. Don't lie about anyone or anything. Don't post unsubstantiated allegations, rumors or gossip that could harm the reputation of a person, company or organization.
  • 5 Be nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
  • 6 Stay on topic. Make sure your comments are about the story. Don’t insult each other.
  • 7 Tell us if the discussion is getting out of hand. Use the ‘Report’ link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
  • 8 Share what you know, and ask about what you don't.
  • 9 Don’t be a troll.
  • 10 Don’t reveal personal information about other commenters. You may reveal your own personal information, but we advise you not to do so.
  • 11 We reserve the right, at our discretion, to monitor, delete or choose not to post any comment. This may include removing or monitoring posts that we believe violate the spirit or letter of these rules, or that we otherwise determine at our discretion needs to be monitored, not posted, or deleted.

Welcome to the discussion.

2 comments:

  • Ron Werner posted at 10:26 pm on Thu, Aug 16, 2012.

    Ron Werner Posts: 101

    Consider these points:
    1) the current method of financing health care is unsustainable. A big factor is due to cost shifting from the government programs to the private sector due to inatequate reimbursement rates and the unreimbursed expenses for treatment of the uninsured.
    2) People will demand the best and most extensive medical care when they're not paying for it. Government rationing is needed to control this.
    3) Decreasing competition certainly increases costs. That's why medical insurace rates are much higher in Northern California than Southern. I've heard that 70% of the population will be able to receive government subsidies through the exchanges. starting in 2014. So the costs won't increase for those people, only the taxpayers who pay for the subsidies. (refer to #2) . When you say costs will rise, you have to clarify for whom?
    4) The impact that healthcare reform will have in 2014 is yet to be written. It appears that most people with individual plans will have to get new insurance because their old plans will be illegal. Many small companies will no longer be able to offer group plans because employees who get subsidies from the exchange will cause big penalities.
    5) Health care reform utilizes the financial hammer to penalize hospitals for such things as infection rates and when patients are readmitted within 30 days after they have been released. I would think a single hospital like Lodi Memorial would find it more difficult to comply than a large hospital chain that can spread the risk over many facilities.
    Interesting times ahead.

     
  • Darrell Baumbach posted at 8:29 am on Thu, Aug 16, 2012.

    Darrell Baumbach Posts: 9405

    Can anyone post links that substantiates when the Federal government is directly involved, that the cost of doing business goes down. Through mandates, regulations and compliance the complexity and difficulty increases. Decreasing competition results in prices going up. Drifting toward a single payer system eliminates competition and quality of care. Canada and England have proven that care for the elderly and sick must be rationed in order for the system to work. Seniors should fear what is coming. People who appreciate freedom to control their destiny should fear our society gravitating toward more and more government control.

    No doubt improvements in the delivery of health care can be improved and modified... but The Affordable Care Act is not the solution. Mark is correct that like it or not change is coming. The fight is over how is will take place. One political party wrote a bill that paid dividends to the people who support their agenda.

     

Recent Comments

Posted 11 hours ago by Jeff Tillett.

Posted 12 hours ago by Angie McDaniel.

article: Letter: Leaders to blame for police dea…

How about following the law in return for a little respect from the cops? How about acknowledging the fact that our police risk their lives…

More...

Posted 12 hours ago by Brian Dockter.

article: Letter: Leaders to blame for police dea…

Thomas stated: Is there no holiday for the malcontents? I mean it's xmas. -Exactly, Or do you not consider the protestors who vandalized…

More...

Posted 12 hours ago by Brian Dockter.

Posted 12 hours ago by Brian Dockter.

article: Letter: Leaders to blame for police dea…

Shane, Has the thought ever crossed your mind that many of these officers were in fear of their civil rights being violated and they had t…

More...

Video

Popular Stories

Poll

Vote on the biggest local story in 2014: See poll below

It has been an eventful year in Lodi, from the antics of a wild turkey named Tom Kettleman to the announced closure of the General Mills plant. What do you see as the biggest story of the year?

Total Votes: 280

Loading…

Your News

News for the community, by the community.

Mailing List

Subscribe to a mailing list to have daily news sent directly to your inbox.

  • Breaking News

    Would you like to receive breaking news alerts? Sign up now!

  • News Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily news headlines? Sign up now!

  • Sports Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily sports headlines? Sign up now!

Manage Your Lists