Lodinews.com

default avatar
Welcome to the site! Login or Signup below.
|
||
Logout|My Dashboard

Judge rules for pension transparency

Print
Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size

Posted: Tuesday, January 17, 2012 12:00 am | Updated: 6:10 am, Tue Jan 17, 2012.

A Superior Court judge recently ordered the release of all pension data for 50,000 Los Angeles County government retirees, rejecting arguments by the union that the records are confidential. The Los Angeles County Employees Retirement Association had, for two years, resisted turning over even the names of pension recipients.

Superior Court Judge James Chalfant's ruling ended a years-long battle for pension transparency in California and held that the Los Angeles Times and taxpayer advocates are entitled to know the retiree's start date, years of service at retirement, the pension formula and the gross medical benefits of Los Angeles County retirees. Scores of LACERA's 50,000 retirees receive six-figure pensions.

In the last 2 1/2 years, eight different California Superior Court judges have ruled in favor of pension transparency. It appears the advocates of openness have defeated the forces of secrecy.

David Renison

President

San Joaquin County Taxpayers Association

Rules of Conduct

  • 1 Use your real name. You must register with your full first and last name before you can comment. (And don’t pretend you’re someone else.)
  • 2 Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually oriented language.
  • 3 Don’t threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
  • 4 Be truthful. Don't lie about anyone or anything. Don't post unsubstantiated allegations, rumors or gossip that could harm the reputation of a person, company or organization.
  • 5 Be nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
  • 6 Stay on topic. Make sure your comments are about the story. Don’t insult each other.
  • 7 Tell us if the discussion is getting out of hand. Use the ‘Report’ link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
  • 8 Share what you know, and ask about what you don't.
  • 9 Don’t be a troll.
  • 10 Don’t reveal personal information about other commenters. You may reveal your own personal information, but we advise you not to do so.
  • 11 We reserve the right, at our discretion, to monitor, delete or choose not to post any comment. This may include removing or monitoring posts that we believe violate the spirit or letter of these rules, or that we otherwise determine at our discretion needs to be monitored, not posted, or deleted.

Welcome to the discussion.

3 comments:

  • Alex Kennedy posted at 5:37 pm on Tue, Jan 17, 2012.

    Alex Posts: 215

    Eew, Darrell and I finally agree. I feel like I should take a shower or something to wash it away.

    I think everything can benefit from transparency. In fact, if they can make a cottonesque fabric that is transparent I would be all for transparent underware.

     
  • Joe Baxter posted at 10:15 am on Tue, Jan 17, 2012.

    Joe Baxter Posts: 1835

    I think the average taxpaying American has no idea how much government retirees are making. Staggering percentages are commonplace. I know for a fact that a retired employee of SJ Count makes in excess of $120K/yr IN RETIREMENT. Retirement for service is fine, to a point. There are thousands of retired government employees laughing all the way to the bank AND those retirements are guaranteed regardless of what the economy is doing. Laying off teachers, firemen, police and other critical workers so that these crazy retirements can be paid is plain nuts. Perhaps a little exposure will enrage the taxpayers enough to take action.

     
  • Darrell Baumbach posted at 8:10 am on Tue, Jan 17, 2012.

    Darrell Baumbach Posts: 9403

    great news!

     

Recent Comments

Posted 3 hours ago by Thomas Heuer.

article: Letter: Obama may be protecting his chi…

Mr Elliot Such wishful thinking your "Three strikes and you are out." One can only wish. [wink]

More...

Posted 3 hours ago by Thomas Heuer.

article: Letter: Obama may be protecting his chi…

Again and again Andrew strives to verify Mr Elliots declaration "The biggest shock is that someone actually expects us to believe this…

More...

Posted 3 hours ago by Treacy Elliott.

article: Letter: Obama may be protecting his chi…

You are absolutely correct. Andrew believes in what he believes in. Nothing anyone can say or do won't change that.

More...

Posted 4 hours ago by Thomas Heuer.

article: Letter: Obama may be protecting his chi…

[thumbup] Thank you Ms Welch you took the words right out of my er Andrews mouth. [wink]

More...

Posted 4 hours ago by Andrew Liebich.

article: Letter: Many states allow guns in schoo…

Mike, You may very well be the only member of the NRA who is not strongly opposed to AB 1014. Have you voiced your opposition to their lett…

More...

Video

Popular Stories

Poll

Loading…

Mailing List

Subscribe to a mailing list to have daily news sent directly to your inbox.

  • Breaking News

    Would you like to receive breaking news alerts? Sign up now!

  • News Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily news headlines? Sign up now!

  • Sports Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily sports headlines? Sign up now!

Manage Your Lists