Lodinews.com

default avatar
Welcome to the site! Login or Signup below.
|
||
Logout|My Dashboard

Predicted the failure of Measure G

Print
Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size

Posted: Monday, December 18, 2006 10:00 pm

There is a rumor going around Lodi concerning Measure G that paramedics are needed on all fire trucks; this is not necessarily so.

While it is true that many calls for service will need a paramedic, some won't. In my way of thinking, if they can't be used 100 percent of the time, the money spent to put paramedics on fire engines could be put to a better use. I speak from experience; Years ago I made the call to 9-1-1.

Since station No. 4 was less than a mile away from my residence, the firefighters were there in a few minutes. Less than a minute later, AMR was on scene. Since all AMR vehicles are mobile and without a permanent location, it's a 50/50 chance of who will get there first. Also stopping to think, AMR will transport a patient in need to a location of their choice, not only in Lodi.

The City of Lodi is in a greater need for more police and money in general, than for a swimming pool or a sports center. If anything, use Measure G to "bail out" the city from the debt it continues to find itself in. The plea for "something to do" has been around forever. There is already a perfectly good pool at Tokay High School and a 24 hour Fitness Center at the end of Cherokee Lane and Lockeford Street. Use the facilities athand rather than building a pool that only would be used by young adults who are interested in swimming. A pool was never the "in" place to hang out since there are rules and regulations. Looking at the intersection of Elm and School streets on Friday and Saturday nights as opposed to a pool on any night of the week, not much going on and the cost to maintain it would be staggering. I wrote this letter before the election so let's see how I did. Thinking people would have voted "No" on Measure G.

Ed Walters

Lodi

Rules of Conduct

  • 1 Use your real name. You must register with your full first and last name before you can comment. (And don’t pretend you’re someone else.)
  • 2 Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually oriented language.
  • 3 Don’t threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
  • 4 Be truthful. Don't lie about anyone or anything. Don't post unsubstantiated allegations, rumors or gossip that could harm the reputation of a person, company or organization.
  • 5 Be nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
  • 6 Stay on topic. Make sure your comments are about the story. Don’t insult each other.
  • 7 Tell us if the discussion is getting out of hand. Use the ‘Report’ link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
  • 8 Share what you know, and ask about what you don't.
  • 9 Don’t be a troll.
  • 10 Don’t reveal personal information about other commenters. You may reveal your own personal information, but we advise you not to do so.
  • 11 We reserve the right, at our discretion, to monitor, delete or choose not to post any comment. This may include removing or monitoring posts that we believe violate the spirit or letter of these rules, or that we otherwise determine at our discretion needs to be monitored, not posted, or deleted.

Welcome to the discussion.

Recent Comments

Posted 3 hours ago by Rick Houdack.

article: Letter: Darwin’s theory has never been …

Facts and truth are not the same thing to you, Kevin Paglia? Your deceptive quote-mining does a disservice to Sagan; the spirituality of wh…

More...

Posted 4 hours ago by M. Doyle.

article: Letter: Darwin’s theory has never been …

Science tries to give you knowledge, Kevin. Nothing more. You have to find meaning for yourself. You don't need science or religion to t…

More...

Posted 5 hours ago by Christina Welch.

article: Letter: Obama may be protecting his chi…

Treacy, my readings about the PRA absolutely confirm what you are saying. I doubt any "picture" will change that.

More...

Posted 5 hours ago by M. Doyle.

article: Letter: Darwin’s theory has never been …

Kevin, we need to clarify definitions and be honest about facts. Science is not a religion or a "belief system." To say that is…

More...

Posted 5 hours ago by Christina Welch.

article: Letter: Darwin’s theory has never been …

While I am more of a humanities gal myself, I do hear what you are saying, even if I'm not as enthusiastic. (I still have nightmares from …

More...

Video

Popular Stories

Poll

Loading…

Your News

News for the community, by the community.

Mailing List

Subscribe to a mailing list to have daily news sent directly to your inbox.

  • Breaking News

    Would you like to receive breaking news alerts? Sign up now!

  • News Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily news headlines? Sign up now!

  • Sports Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily sports headlines? Sign up now!

Manage Your Lists