Lodinews.com

default avatar
Welcome to the site! Login or Signup below.
|
||
Logout|My Dashboard

Constitution is under attack by the NAU

Print
Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size

Posted: Wednesday, March 21, 2007 10:00 pm

I would like to thank the LNS and Dennis Cochran for building public awareness of the North American Union (NAU), in "No more borders means no more illegals."

The NAU is a diabolical plan by ultra-elite, to nullify the Constitution of the United States, by surrendering it to a superior governmental jurisdiction encompassing what is now Canada, USA and Mexico.

The Security and Prosperity Partnership is a "softlaw" treaty handshake agreement between President Bush, President Vicente Fox and Prime Minister Martin. Thus there isn't any tangible documentation that can be submitted to the Senate for approval, and leaders who are "sleeping on watch" do not know about it. Thus the principle "NAU by stealth."

Recently, the public interest group Judicial Watch filed a Freedom of Information Act request on the U.S. Northern Command (NORTHCOM), who participated in the second meeting of the North American forum, held September 12-14, 2006, in Banff, Canada. The documents revealed arguments by Pedro Aspe, former Mexican finance minister, who called for narrowing of the income gap between Americans and Mexicans, integration of transportation networks, and combined customs and duties. Aspe's most chilling remark was a reminder to participants that "European integration was driven by crisis."

Thus he was indicating the possibility that a crisis may be manufactured to induce integration. Aspe, a former Mexican government official, is advocating a crisis in America, in the presence of NORTHCOM. Aspe is using an old concept that unknowing citizens are willing to surrender their freedoms or go to war, in exchange for security. This principle was advanced by Adolf Hitler when he asked for parliament to dissolve itself in response to alleged Russian terrorism (Hitler's Brown Shirts) that had burned the Reich building.

I recommend withholding campaign donations to any politician who is "sleeping on watch" while the American Constitution is under attack by the stealthy NAU. Angry citizens can contact our representatives in Washington. Sen. Dianne Feinstein must understand, because she is a member of the Council on Foreign Relations, which has advanced this plan from the American side.

Daniel Hutchins

Acampo

Rules of Conduct

  • 1 Use your real name. You must register with your full first and last name before you can comment. (And don’t pretend you’re someone else.)
  • 2 Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually oriented language.
  • 3 Don’t threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
  • 4 Be truthful. Don't lie about anyone or anything. Don't post unsubstantiated allegations, rumors or gossip that could harm the reputation of a person, company or organization.
  • 5 Be nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
  • 6 Stay on topic. Make sure your comments are about the story. Don’t insult each other.
  • 7 Tell us if the discussion is getting out of hand. Use the ‘Report’ link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
  • 8 Share what you know, and ask about what you don't.
  • 9 Don’t be a troll.
  • 10 Don’t reveal personal information about other commenters. You may reveal your own personal information, but we advise you not to do so.
  • 11 We reserve the right, at our discretion, to monitor, delete or choose not to post any comment. This may include removing or monitoring posts that we believe violate the spirit or letter of these rules, or that we otherwise determine at our discretion needs to be monitored, not posted, or deleted.

Welcome to the discussion.

1 comment:

  • posted at 3:04 am on Fri, Mar 23, 2007.

    Posts:

    An interesting article with some with some thoughtful posts. There are many things to examine and consider when looking at such a proposal. It may have merit however. One thing seems clear to me: we cannot solve the problems of today and the future with yesterdays ineffective solutions. We must find alternative ways. This may be one of them. One more thought: there are no absolute national boundaries forever etched in time. These are formed out of political and miltary necessity and expedience. We can work with this.

     

Recent Comments

Posted 14 hours ago by Simon Birch.

article: Letter: Friend’s car was wrongfully tow…

Mike: The settings are supposed to allow replies up to 6 levels deep (reply to reply to reply, etc.). My apologies to everyone if this isn'…

More...

Posted 15 hours ago by Mike Adams.

article: Letter: Evolutionism is a hypothesis, n…

So "Creationism" is a law? Where is the irrefutable evidence that proves Creationism is always true? Evolution is a theory, not…

More...

Posted 15 hours ago by Mike Adams.

article: Letter: Friend’s car was wrongfully tow…

Jien: If I may extend myself here without the permission of Jerome, and possibly defend him, he was saying that the reply button will enab…

More...

Posted 15 hours ago by Thomas Heuer.

article: Letter: Thanks for the discussion on th…

Ms Welch I feel you missed the point. How do you tell what is acceptable at any given time in your beliefs when others have been led to ext…

More...

Posted 17 hours ago by Thomas Heuer.

article: Letter: Jesus should be what makes chur…

And so it was written from above; "So why do people attend church in Lodi? (Duh, I guess I go for the socializing and fun, duh…

More...

Video

Popular Stories

Poll

Loading…

Your News

News for the community, by the community.

Mailing List

Subscribe to a mailing list to have daily news sent directly to your inbox.

  • Breaking News

    Would you like to receive breaking news alerts? Sign up now!

  • News Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily news headlines? Sign up now!

  • Sports Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily sports headlines? Sign up now!

Manage Your Lists