Lodinews.com

default avatar
Welcome to the site! Login or Signup below.
|
||
Logout|My Dashboard

Student input should be a vital part of the social networking policy

Print
Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size

Posted: Saturday, August 10, 2013 12:00 am

Lodi Unified School District administrators, you made a big mistake instituting a policy without student input. News-Sentinel reporter Ross Farrow asked Dawn Vetica great questions and she failed to answer them, in my opinion. Here are a few examples:

Question 1: Was there input from students, teachers, coaches or parents?

Answer: Administrators made the policy.

Question 2: Who investigates?

Answer: School administrators or school personnel.

Question 3: What about other students not involved in extracurricular activities?

Answer: It was never answered, she just talked around the subject and brought up another policy.

Question 4: How is it determined what is “inappropriate?”

Answer: School personnel.

Question 5: Are there plans to work with concerned students?

Answer: Meet with principals and present to board.

In her answers, the students, parents and teachers are never mentioned.

This is the top-down attitude of the current LUSD administration. Where are the students who are supposed to be the center of all that is done at LUSD?

Steve Hansen also commented that there is a chance of “capricious interpretation.” Oh, how true!

Please rethink your approach, LUSD administrators, and include your charges.

Linda Stiehr

Former Lodi Unified School District educator of 32 years

Rules of Conduct

  • 1 Use your real name. You must register with your full first and last name before you can comment. (And don’t pretend you’re someone else.)
  • 2 Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually oriented language.
  • 3 Don’t threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
  • 4 Be truthful. Don't lie about anyone or anything. Don't post unsubstantiated allegations, rumors or gossip that could harm the reputation of a person, company or organization.
  • 5 Be nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
  • 6 Stay on topic. Make sure your comments are about the story. Don’t insult each other.
  • 7 Tell us if the discussion is getting out of hand. Use the ‘Report’ link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
  • 8 Share what you know, and ask about what you don't.
  • 9 Don’t be a troll.
  • 10 Don’t reveal personal information about other commenters. You may reveal your own personal information, but we advise you not to do so.
  • 11 We reserve the right, at our discretion, to monitor, delete or choose not to post any comment. This may include removing or monitoring posts that we believe violate the spirit or letter of these rules, or that we otherwise determine at our discretion needs to be monitored, not posted, or deleted.

Welcome to the discussion.

1 comment:

  • Susan Burkhardt posted at 2:06 pm on Mon, Aug 12, 2013.

    sjburkie Posts: 2

    I feel I need to respond to this situation, as I can completely understand how students feel these regulations violate their right to free speech, but as a graduate student in Educational Administration and Leadership, my own eyes were clearly opened after taking a few legal issues in public education courses. I will just highlight a few recent cases on how the courts have ruled on free speech issues of students, as well as what the courts believe is the responsibility that a school has in controlling behavior that is threatening, harassing or bullying and creates a hostile environment. Many students think attendance at public schools is a "right" rather than looking at it as being able to enjoy the privilege of attending school, as certain laws must be adhered to in order to maintain a non-threatening learning environment.

    I think all students, parents, teachers and administrators should be familiar with these recent rulings in the courts:
    :
    “the common law, too, has put schools on notice that they may be held responsible under state law for their failure to protect students from the tortuous acts of third parties” (Davis v. Monroe County Board of Education, 1999)

    schools are responsible for “teaching students the boundaries of socially appropriate behavior” and therefore must play a role in restricting behavior and speech that is considered “highly offensive or highly threatening to others” (Bethel School District v. Fraser, 1986).

    “courts have held that school districts are allowed to intervene in situations wherein off-campus speech is clearly threatening to students or staff and therefore disruptive to the learning environment and the educational process.”( J.S. v. Bethlehem Area School District 2000)

    “the primary function of a public school...is to educate its students; conduct that substantially interferes with the mission (including speech that substantially interferes with a student’s educational performance) is… disruptive to the school environment” (Saxe v. State College Area School District, 2001)

    “.. school authorities have a responsibility to prevent intimidation by one student on another—including bullying by name calling” (Sypniewski v. Warren Hills Regional Board of Education, 2002)

    And in regards to restricting student athletes:

    "participation in extracurricular activities is considered to be a privilege, not a right. As such, participants may be subject to additional or different rules than regular students. Lower courts and the U.S. Supreme Court have noted that participants in extracurricular sports, by electing to participate, subject themselves to these rules. In 1995, the Supreme Court decided a case in which it upheld drug testing for student athletes. In its opinion, the Court noted: “By choosing to ‘go out for the team,’ [student athletes] voluntarily subject themselves to a degree of regulation even higher than that imposed on students generally.” Vernonia Sch. Dist. 47J v. Acton, U.S. 646, 657 (1995)

    "a U.S. District Court in Missouri. In Hurt v. Boonville R-1 School District Case, No. 02-4267-CV-C-SOW (W.D. Mo. 2002), a high school student was not allowed to play in a basketball game because he wore his hair in a type of braid called cornrows. This style violated the team coach’s grooming policy. Though calling the rule “stupid and dumb,” the judge deciding the case found no violation of constitutional or statutory rights and said that “high school coaches have discretion and authority to impose additional requirements on student athletes.”

    The law is not black and white, but school's do have a responsibility to maintain a hostile free learning environment to ALL students, in keeping that in mind I think the district's regulations are very fitting.

     

Recent Comments

Posted 1 hour ago by Thomas Heuer.

article: Letter: Questions for Obama supporters

MR Kinderman Just for your information because I now know it to be important to you Ms Pelosi's full name is; Nancy Patricia D'Alesandro …

More...

Posted 1 hour ago by Kenneth Huntley.

article: Lodi exploring park fees

I must say that I'm truly disappointed in the reporter for writing such a one-sided story. Instead of assumptions and heresy, why not actua…

More...

Posted 2 hours ago by Dana Warner.

article: Pit bull euthanized after review

This story is so heartbreaking I can't even hardly take it. It's actually disgusting. Someone in Stockton is looking for their pet... I hop…

More...

Posted 2 hours ago by Thomas Heuer.

article: Letter: There is no contest in the gube…

Eh eh, no it doesn't. It makes an allegation only. Anybody, as you should know by now, can make an allegation. Where's the rebuttal? Where'…

More...

Posted 3 hours ago by Walter Chang.

article: Letter: Joe Guzzardi’s June 20 column c…

Hi Joanne, good letter. Debunking Joe's nonsense can almost be a fulltime job!! I have to admit that I seldom read anything that the man …

More...

Video

Popular Stories

Poll

Loading…

Your News

News for the community, by the community.

Mailing List

Subscribe to a mailing list to have daily news sent directly to your inbox.

  • Breaking News

    Would you like to receive breaking news alerts? Sign up now!

  • News Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily news headlines? Sign up now!

  • Sports Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily sports headlines? Sign up now!

Manage Your Lists