Lodinews.com

default avatar
Welcome to the site! Login or Signup below.
|
||
Logout|My Dashboard

Abolish the death penalty — vote ‘yes’ on Proposition 34

Print
Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size

Posted: Saturday, November 3, 2012 12:00 am | Updated: 6:26 am, Sat Nov 3, 2012.

I have always been for the death penalty, but how long has it been since any one of the inmates on death row was executed? According to the article in the Lodi News-Sentinel, "Three California ex-governors oppose repeal of death penalty," by AP Writer Michael R. Blood (front page), there are 700 of them on death row and no execution since 2006! How many executions then — one?

Let's put a stop to this attorney haven and abolish the death sentence. Let's put the inmates in prison for life, since they are dying from old age on death row right now anyway.

Of course the prosecutors and attorneys want to keep the death penalty. It's money in their pockets as the prisoners sit with time on their hands preparing lawsuit after lawsuit and appeal after appeal.

Since 1979, $4 billion has been spent on this, and who pays it? The taxpayers.

Let's give them life without parole. That's how it is now anyway. Vote "yes" on Proposition 34.

Shirley Schmierer

Lodi

Rules of Conduct

  • 1 Use your real name. You must register with your full first and last name before you can comment. (And don’t pretend you’re someone else.)
  • 2 Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually oriented language.
  • 3 Don’t threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
  • 4 Be truthful. Don't lie about anyone or anything. Don't post unsubstantiated allegations, rumors or gossip that could harm the reputation of a person, company or organization.
  • 5 Be nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
  • 6 Stay on topic. Make sure your comments are about the story. Don’t insult each other.
  • 7 Tell us if the discussion is getting out of hand. Use the ‘Report’ link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
  • 8 Share what you know, and ask about what you don't.
  • 9 Don’t be a troll.
  • 10 Don’t reveal personal information about other commenters. You may reveal your own personal information, but we advise you not to do so.
  • 11 We reserve the right, at our discretion, to monitor, delete or choose not to post any comment. This may include removing or monitoring posts that we believe violate the spirit or letter of these rules, or that we otherwise determine at our discretion needs to be monitored, not posted, or deleted.

Welcome to the discussion.

3 comments:

  • Patrick W Maple posted at 5:56 pm on Sun, Nov 4, 2012.

    Pat Maple Posts: 1805

    Our entire punishment system should be revamped, including the Death penalty. The penalty was supposed to be a deterrent...in all likelyhood it is for most people. However for those who CHOOSE to put themsleves into the position of wanting to kill someone and then doing so, this is not a deterrent...until they get caught and convicted.

    As defined: " Morality (from the Latin moralitas "manner, character, proper behavior") is the differentiation of intentions, decisions, and actions between those that are good (or right) and those that are bad (or wrong)." In my book leave out morality...there is neither right or wrong. Rather, does it work or not work for me? I can say without one doubt murder does not work for me...not matter who, where, why or by what means dead is dead.

    The criteria should be only if they did do it or did not do it (unless torture or a child is involved then special rules should apply). If they are convicted...there should be no more than three appeals...and since the courts view all people as being equal and that all courts justice is applied equally...then the facts are all that should be challenged during the appeals. Is this ethical?

    Paul and Elder define ethics as "a set of concepts and principles that guide us in determining what behavior helps or harms sentient (conscious) creatures". Murder does not help anyone...it only harms. I would argue that the only reasonable need for the Death penalty is that it helps society. I would also argue that the Death penalty is not a concept or idea...when a person is put to death...as many members of a victims families have stated...there is closure and what they once feared is now gone...the concept is now a fact.

     
  • Darrell Baumbach posted at 7:56 am on Sun, Nov 4, 2012.

    Darrell Baumbach Posts: 9403

    The letter stated...I have always been for the death penalty, but how long has it been since any one of the inmates on death row was executed..

    This letter implies that she does not want the death penalty because it takes too long and is too expensive to execute people given the death penalty.
    If that is the objection, I suggest supporting legislation that simplifies and shortens the process, like no appeals after 5 years. I assume that Shirley would be for the death penalty if the person could be executed quickly and at little expense.
    P This is not a matter of money but morality.

    Lastly, why does this bill involve 100 million dollars or tax revenue. Why does this bill not just say yes or no on the death penalty?

    It would be easier to eliminate the death penalty when a simple bill is presented that only does that.

     
  • Josh Morgan posted at 8:11 am on Sat, Nov 3, 2012.

    Josh Morgan Posts: 532

    Shirley, as one who has supported the death penalty at every opportunity I will not longer support it and vote yes on Prop. 34. The wasted taxpayer money is enormous and for what........nothing! Put these guys/gals in prison for life and let them take care of themselves. I'm tired of it!!

     

Recent Comments

Posted 7 hours ago by Andrew Liebich.

article: Letter: Obama may be protecting his chi…

There are 29 sources cited at the end of the video Christina.[sleeping] Can I waste 30 minutes providing you with documented and verifiabl…

More...

Posted 8 hours ago by Jerome Kinderman.

article: We won’t repost Sandy Hook hoax comments

"Troll" defined: "In Internet slang, a troll (/ˈtroʊl/, /ˈtrɒl/) is a person who sows discord on the Internet by starting ar…

More...

Posted 8 hours ago by Mike Adams.

article: Letter: Many states allow guns in schoo…

Simon didn't print the original post which was much better than this one will be: What part of "nah" don't you understand? Why s…

More...

Posted 8 hours ago by Andrew Liebich.

article: We won’t repost Sandy Hook hoax comments

First, the fact that you were "offended" does not make me wrong Mr. Barrow.[lol] Second, the LNS's poll indicates that the major…

More...

Posted 8 hours ago by Thomas Heuer.

article: Letter: The people are better off becau…

Thank you Eric But don't worry about that stock market when the stocks get too lofty they'll split and get more affordable. Mr Taves and …

More...

Video

Popular Stories

Poll

Loading…

Mailing List

Subscribe to a mailing list to have daily news sent directly to your inbox.

  • Breaking News

    Would you like to receive breaking news alerts? Sign up now!

  • News Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily news headlines? Sign up now!

  • Sports Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily sports headlines? Sign up now!

Manage Your Lists