Lodinews.com

default avatar
Welcome to the site! Login or Signup below.
|
||
Logout|My Dashboard

Water treatment plant not economical

Print
Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size

Posted: Thursday, March 24, 2011 12:00 am | Updated: 6:28 am, Thu Mar 24, 2011.

Lodi City Council members Susan Hitchcock and JoAnne Mounce got it right when they opposed a water treatment plant.

Councilman Bob Johnson said that using surface water instead of well water is the best kind of groundwater recharge. He should have added, "If it makes sense."

I submit that a Lodi water treatment plant does not make economic sense.

Groundwater recharge with spreading basins usually costs about $50 per acre-foot when there is no cost for water and where major infrastructure exists. North San Joaquin Water Conservation District has offered water at no cost and conveyance facilities are in place at the district and within Woodbridge Irrigation District.

A single family residence in Lodi uses about 0.5 acre foot per year.

Treated water would cost approximately $1,000 per acre-foot. This is based upon the following annual costs: $1.2 million for water, $2.8 million for personnel and operations, and at least $2 million for debt service for the $36 million plant for a total of $6 million for the 6,000 acre-feet purchased from WID. Please note that I have not included the costs for the wells needed to supply the 6,000 acre-feet during dry years when the WID water will not be available.

The water treatment plant project would not help to correct the groundwater overdraft, but would maintain the correction at the same level that existed when WID provided the 6,000 acre-feet for flood irrigation. WID sold the so-called "saved" water to Lodi after flood irrigation was replaced by drip. So, the treatment plant would get us back to where we were prior to 2003. It would not improve upon the recharge being done before 2003 with the extra flood irrigation water.

It seems obvious that the city should be working with the two water districts to construct and operate spreading basing recharge projects.

Ed Steffani

Clements

Rules of Conduct

  • 1 Use your real name. You must register with your full first and last name before you can comment. (And don't pretend you're someone else.)
  • 2 Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually oriented language.
  • 3 Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
  • 4 Be truthful. Don't lie about anyone or anything. Don't post unsubstantiated allegations, rumors or gossip that could harm the reputation of a person, company or organization.
  • 5 Be nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
  • 6 Stay on topic. Make sure your comments are about the story. Don't insult each other.
  • 7 Tell us if the discussion is getting out of hand. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
  • 8 Share what you know, and ask about what you don't.

Welcome to the discussion.

4 comments:

  • Jackson Scott posted at 10:59 am on Fri, Mar 25, 2011.

    Jackson Scott Posts: 382

    Dave, I say that about every decision the CC makes.

    Did the city not hire some fancy consultant on this project before hand to do a feasibility study? If so they just hired the firm who would give them the answer they wanted.

    Such a beautiful and precious piece of land going to be used for an industrial plant that is economically a disaster. Nice job Larry Moe & Curly, errrr. Larry Bob & Phil.

     
  • roy bitz posted at 10:52 pm on Thu, Mar 24, 2011.

    roy bitz Posts: 489

    Thank you Mr. Steffani.
    Mr. Steffani has many many years experience with local water resources---the river and the ground water. I believe he is an expert on our local water resources.
    If his commentary cannnot delay the construction of this project, it will clarify the costs associated with it, the fact that it is not needed, and it will not help solve the ground water over draft problem.
    I hope one day, the LNS will list----all the costs associated with this project and tell of the benefits of this project. I don't expect the city to provide this documentation.
    Until then, I continue to call this project "Lodi's bridge to nowhere".

     
  • Dave Christy posted at 3:49 pm on Thu, Mar 24, 2011.

    Dave Christy Posts: 27

    Where was Ed Steffani when we needed him ? Instead of having educated water people making decisions on spending millions the decision was made by an ex-cop, a RealEstate appraiser, and a printer.

     
  • jacklyn bjork posted at 1:42 pm on Thu, Mar 24, 2011.

    jacklyn bjork Posts: 1

    DeBenedetti park, what a waste of time and taxpayers money. the field of weeds across the street from the park looks better than the field of dreams , the city of lodi planted. a waste of time and kentucky seeds. also we waste a lot on salary and gas for the water patrol to run around lodi this time of year , just to catch a few people watering at the wrong time. the city of lodi needs to wake up

     

Recent Comments

Posted 19 hours ago by the old dog.

article: Letter: I’m not the one who should move…

No need to move to another country, other countries are moving to this country. Though Barry is commander in grief, if your in the milita…

More...

Posted 20 hours ago by nth degree wise.

article: Letter: Pastor Frank Nolton forgets abo…

[offtopic] Both rights yes. However marriage doesn't mass kill kids on school grounds so restrictions are only needed on guns.

More...

Posted 20 hours ago by Joe Baxter.

article: Letter: Little signs show our economy i…

Bobbin, I don't take any perscription medications on a regular basis. I am healthy as they come and plan on sticking around to expose liber…

More...

Posted 21 hours ago by Frank Gayaldo.

article: San Joaquin County supervisors approve …

Hi Walt, while my bias towards the county needing a new sheriff is clear, I base my comments on facts, not personal attacks. I am not a &q…

More...

Posted 22 hours ago by Andrew Liebich.

article: Letter: Little signs show our economy i…

Haven't you heard Mr. Baxter... " raising the debt ceiling, which has been done over a hundred times, does not increase our debt"…

More...

Video

Popular Stories

Poll

Loading…

Mailing List

Subscribe to a mailing list to have daily news sent directly to your inbox.

  • Breaking News

    Would you like to receive breaking news alerts? Sign up now!

  • News Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily news headlines? Sign up now!

  • Sports Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily sports headlines? Sign up now!

Manage Your Lists