5 comments:

• Darrell Baumbach posted at 3:32 pm on Sat, Jul 7, 2012.

  Posts: 9403

  Thanks for the clarification. Your letter inspired me to write a response to the editor today that I already submitted. I appreciate your intent but I think this chicken issue is pertinent and important in itself.
  

  • Link

   

• Tracy Gross posted at 3:14 pm on Sat, Jul 7, 2012.

  Posts: 2

  Mr. Baumbach - My comments were not meant to sound like I don't feel the discussion of chickens in Galt is a valid discussion or not. My comments were meant to show that the Galt City Council say they care about allowing something in Galt that might bother a neighbor so I hope they will care about all of us that will be hurt if they bring this waste recovery facility to Galt. I feel the people we elect should care about everything they allow in that could change the quality of our lives. We fought this battle once before - why are we fighting it again? And more important - do these 5 people care? Galt City Council Members - do you care??

  • Link

   

• dan jimenez posted at 2:54 pm on Sat, Jul 7, 2012.

  Posts: 3

  Tracy, remember you can't fix stupid, but you can vote it out of office!!!!!!!

  • Link

   

• Darrell Baumbach posted at 12:58 pm on Sat, Jul 7, 2012.

  Posts: 9403

  All of this concern regarding the impact of chickens in our backyards?

  I think this is a much more important issue that simply referring to it this way... we should be concerned about this and other rights. It's a freedom issue.

  • Link

   

• Marc Yates posted at 7:06 am on Sat, Jul 7, 2012.

  Posts: 21

  You are 100% correct, Tracy. They want you to "watch the birdy" while they vote themselves a substantial health insurance package with other benefits. First it was the transfer station...now a recycling center. Same game, different name. Galt needs to get some business people with leadership ability on the council who also care about the quality of life for those who suffer the consequences of the decisions they make.

  • Link