Lodinews.com

default avatar
Welcome to the site! Login or Signup below.
|
||
Logout|My Dashboard

Statement in story clarified

Print
Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size

Posted: Saturday, March 2, 2013 12:00 am

I wish to clarify my alleged statements in your story published Feb. 23. I did not pledge to violate regulations, and I do not intend to construct anything — including an ag store with a deli — against county regulations and approval. These are the words of the writer.

Because of Supervisor Ruhstaller's comment that "we may not follow the rules," I stated to your reporter that "I probably should just do whatever the hell I want and ask for forgiveness." I was being sarcastic; that is not the way I operate.

Before this hearing, I was advised to seek something smaller and then do whatever I wanted, but I chose not to do that because I am and always will be an upstanding citizen who abides by the rules, even if I do not like them. I have played by the rules and three of our Board of Supervisors have not:

  • Supervisor Bestolorides voted on his personal opinion "that one should not serve food in the country." He allowed his personal opinion to rule against existing county ordinance.
  • Supervisor Ruhstaller voted against Viaggio because "the Lawrences may not follow the rules," judging us guilty until proven innocent! (This was his public reason, but his private reasons go deeper into his personal relationship with Viaggio's previous owner.) Ruhstaller should have actually recused himself because of his deep emotional feelings on the subject. I have a proven track record of following the rules already!
  • Supervisor Vogel voted against Viaggio because he has never voted against the Farm Bureau. So for him it is politics as usual — forget what the county ordinance is!

I understand that the permit is "discretionary" and the board has the final word, but neither Ruhstaller and Bestolorides nor their aides ever took the time to come out to Viaggio and see the very little impact an ag store would have — even after repeated invitations.

The Farm Bureau is rapidly gaining a track record of no longer supporting its members, but instead becoming a land police — much like a communist country — denying owners of land and business a chance to expand the economy and flourish, providing jobs and benefits to the county, simply in a desire to grasp control of something they should not be grasping for.

Viaggio has the law on its side, but we fought the politics and the politics won. The Planning Commission chose the law (5-0); the Board of Supervisors (three of them) chose politics.

Larry M. Lawrence

Viaggio Owner

Rules of Conduct

  • 1 Use your real name. You must register with your full first and last name before you can comment. (And don't pretend you're someone else.)
  • 2 Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually oriented language.
  • 3 Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
  • 4 Be truthful. Don't lie about anyone or anything. Don't post unsubstantiated allegations, rumors or gossip that could harm the reputation of a person, company or organization.
  • 5 Be nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
  • 6 Stay on topic. Make sure your comments are about the story. Don't insult each other.
  • 7 Tell us if the discussion is getting out of hand. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
  • 8 Share what you know, and ask about what you don't.

Welcome to the discussion.

2 comments:

  • Charles Nelson posted at 9:33 am on Wed, Mar 6, 2013.

    Charles Nelson Posts: 257

    when did the government get into the business of keeping people out of business? Mr. Lawrence isn't seeking to build anything new a his winery, he just seeks to utilize the assets he already has in place. This decision has no basis in reason.

     
  • Sam Heller posted at 10:30 pm on Mon, Mar 4, 2013.

    Sam Heller Posts: 176

    Larry, I think you should follow how the county Supes vote on Diede's proposed development on Armstrong Road. Diede wants to build a 6 acre hotel/restaurant/wine destination on ag land. There are no buildings on his 6 acres now, just a cherry orchard. The land is AG40.

    How is the infrastructure for the sewer and water going to miraculously appear on Armstrong for this project? Lodi will do this for Diede?

    If Lodi and Stockton truly want to preserve the farmland between the two cities, this project should be a denied.

    If the supervisors truly believe in "preserving farmland" they should unanimously deny the project.

    I would watch this vote, Larry. Why Diede and NOT you ?

     

Recent Comments

Posted 7 hours ago by Joe Baxter.

article: San Joaquin County supervisors approve …

I am still wondering why someone that resides in Sacramento County should be concerned with San Joaquin County politics. Unless it is just …

More...

Posted 12 hours ago by Joanne Bobin.

article: Letter: Obamacare is not the program pr…

Good work, Mr. Barrow. You have identified many in the past, and now finally with some results!

More...

Posted 12 hours ago by Joanne Bobin.

article: Letter: Obamacare is not the program pr…

Thank you to the LNS for FINALLY rejecting a letter due to plagiarism. There have been countless instances of letters copied and pasted fr…

More...

Posted Yesterday by the old dog.

article: Letter: I’m not the one who should move…

Walter: Concerning "Swiftboats" another John did offend me. Kerry gives himself a Purple Heart while cutting himself shaving. …

More...

Posted Yesterday by Andrew Liebich.

article: Letter: Liberal policies damage our ind…

[sleeping] http://youtu.be/cA8FTjAzRR8

More...

Video

Popular Stories

Poll

Should graduations return to the Grape Bowl?

Lodi Unified leaders are moving Lodi and Tokay high school graduations from the Grape Bowl to the Spanos Center at UOP in Stockton. They cite limited seating, costs and unpredictable weather at the Grape Bowl. But others say graduations at the Grape Bowl are an important Lodi tradition, and one reason many supported renovating the stadium. What do you think?

Total Votes: 78

Loading…

Mailing List

Subscribe to a mailing list to have daily news sent directly to your inbox.

  • Breaking News

    Would you like to receive breaking news alerts? Sign up now!

  • News Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily news headlines? Sign up now!

  • Sports Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily sports headlines? Sign up now!

Manage Your Lists