Lodinews.com

default avatar
Welcome to the site! Login or Signup below.
|
||
Logout|My Dashboard

Letter: Stop wasting tax money on benefits for part-timers

Print
Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size

Posted: Saturday, March 1, 2014 12:00 am

The San Joaquin County Mosquito and Vector Control District is governed by a non-elected, part-time board of trustees, and the agency is funded through property taxes and special benefit assessments.

Each of the seven cities in San Joaquin County appoints one trustee, and the San Joaquin County Board of Supervisors appoints four trustees to represent the unincorporated areas of the county.

Trustees meet each month and they receive a per-meeting stipend of $100. However, the San Joaquin Taxpayers Association discovered that the trustees had, in fact, voted on July 21, 2009, to approve health insurance benefits for themselves that are normally reserved for full-time employees.

It is unconscionable for taxpayers to be expected to bear the cost of retirement, health insurance and other benefits for part-time, appointed individuals.

Because of public interest and local media coverage on such a waste of taxpayer money, followed by a San Joaquin County Grand Jury report, the district’s attorney asked the trustees to revisit the issue. Most recently, the matter was discussed at the district’s regular meeting on Jan. 21. Several trustees spoke in favor of continuing the benefit, and some spoke against it.

The trustees will again revisit the issue at their next meeting on March 17, which is open to all county residents. We are hopeful that they will vote to discontinue the benefits and end this outrageous betrayal of public trust.

David Renison

President

San Joaquin County Taxpayers Association, Inc.

Rules of Conduct

  • 1 Use your real name. You must register with your full first and last name before you can comment. (And don’t pretend you’re someone else.)
  • 2 Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually oriented language.
  • 3 Don’t threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
  • 4 Be truthful. Don't lie about anyone or anything. Don't post unsubstantiated allegations, rumors or gossip that could harm the reputation of a person, company or organization.
  • 5 Be nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
  • 6 Stay on topic. Make sure your comments are about the story. Don’t insult each other.
  • 7 Tell us if the discussion is getting out of hand. Use the ‘Report’ link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
  • 8 Share what you know, and ask about what you don't.
  • 9 Don’t be a troll.
  • 10 Don’t reveal personal information about other commenters. You may reveal your own personal information, but we advise you not to do so.
  • 11 We reserve the right, at our discretion, to monitor, delete or choose not to post any comment. This may include removing or monitoring posts that we believe violate the spirit or letter of these rules, or that we otherwise determine at our discretion needs to be monitored, not posted, or deleted.

Welcome to the discussion.

1 comment:

  • Christina Welch posted at 1:47 pm on Mon, Mar 3, 2014.

    Christina Welch Posts: 313

    I am certainly glad we have watchdog groups such as the taxpayers association that bring this kind of information to light. And I certainly hope the district will vote to discontinue the benefits they are receiving. Please keep us informed, David.
    Thanks!

     

Recent Comments

Posted 3 hours ago by Jien Kaur.

article: Letter: We must deal with Islamic State…

So sorry mr Mork. You made the mock of my English in a former comment and said you were the 'Mork from Ork'. I believe you word not think…

More...

Posted 4 hours ago by M. Doyle.

article: Letter: We should reconsider using firi…

Jerome, I too appreciate your common sense analysis of the facts and humanitarian opposition to the death penalty.

More...

Posted 7 hours ago by Thomas Heuer.

article: Letter: We must deal with Islamic State…

Ms Kaur you are absolutely correct.

More...

Posted 10 hours ago by Michael Nedderman.

article: Letter: Thanks for the discussion on th…

First, M, the format here is confusing enough if you post under the comment to which you are replying, but putting your comment on top, as …

More...

Posted 12 hours ago by M. Doyle.

article: Letter: Thanks for the discussion on th…

I'd like to correct a misstatement typed in haste. Leaving out words inadvertently makes meaning unclear. Without evidence, we can not …

More...

Video

Popular Stories

Poll

Loading…

Your News

News for the community, by the community.

Mailing List

Subscribe to a mailing list to have daily news sent directly to your inbox.

  • Breaking News

    Would you like to receive breaking news alerts? Sign up now!

  • News Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily news headlines? Sign up now!

  • Sports Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily sports headlines? Sign up now!

Manage Your Lists