Lodinews.com

default avatar
Welcome to the site! Login or Signup below.
|
||
Logout|My Dashboard

Liberal justice strikes again

Print
Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size

Posted: Saturday, August 11, 2012 12:00 am | Updated: 6:47 am, Sat Aug 11, 2012.

The liberal justice system is just as much to blame in the shootings in Aurora, Colo. as the person who committed the crime. Those who commit these crimes know that they have two options going in. They can commit suicide at the scene or wait to be arrested and opt to be defended by a court-appointed defense team.

This team won't come cheap. They impose a great hardship on cash-strapped cities and towns across the nation. It gets worse when the ACLU and other bleeding-heart liberals jump in to support someone who has taken the lives of so many, to make sure their rights are not violated.

The liberal cause moves on. "Hanging Judge" Roy Bean is turning over in his grave about now. Our homes and towns are getting no safer than those in Iraq or Afghanistan.

Robert Wolford

Lodi

Rules of Conduct

  • 1 Use your real name. You must register with your full first and last name before you can comment. (And don’t pretend you’re someone else.)
  • 2 Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually oriented language.
  • 3 Don’t threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
  • 4 Be truthful. Don't lie about anyone or anything. Don't post unsubstantiated allegations, rumors or gossip that could harm the reputation of a person, company or organization.
  • 5 Be nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
  • 6 Stay on topic. Make sure your comments are about the story. Don’t insult each other.
  • 7 Tell us if the discussion is getting out of hand. Use the ‘Report’ link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
  • 8 Share what you know, and ask about what you don't.
  • 9 Don’t be a troll.
  • 10 Don’t reveal personal information about other commenters. You may reveal your own personal information, but we advise you not to do so.
  • 11 We reserve the right, at our discretion, to monitor, delete or choose not to post any comment. This may include removing or monitoring posts that we believe violate the spirit or letter of these rules, or that we otherwise determine at our discretion needs to be monitored, not posted, or deleted.

Welcome to the discussion.

58 comments:

  • Mike Adams posted at 10:45 am on Sun, Aug 19, 2012.

    Mike Adams Posts: 1362

    Funny.... you are incredibly pathetic. A lonesome soul convinced everything is a big plot by shadowy figures who meet in secret but there are 178 world leaders who are experts in everything trying to convince the world that the wool is being pulled over their collective eyes.

    What's even more sad is that you (and your fellow conspiracy theorists) fit some sort of psychological profile that indicates you are suffering some sort of mental disorder. Honestly, I don't think they should sell you guns either. The "Joker" in the Batman movie probably fit your same psychological profile.

    Just know that we (and in particularly me*) will be here to support you and all your kookie, wing nut, crazy plots. And keep those stolen words coming!!! Your personal style of prose is quite taxing on the senses and we find it is difficult to follow along. Or maybe you just have your conspiracies confused. There are just so many!

    *Well maybe I won't be supportive in the literal sense...but I promise to always be where you steal someone elses work and put your name on it. Until you learn not to do it anymore.

     
  • Andrew Liebich posted at 6:47 pm on Thu, Aug 16, 2012.

    Andrew Liebich Posts: 2999

    Your never ending stupidity is actually beginning to bore us Mike... [lol]

    What "kooky conspiracy web site" are you referring to? I have provided ONE link and it was to a jpeg. I asked ONE simple question, "Think...#1 or #2?" Your idiotic response was, "Yes, that's what I'm saying. No, it's not. Don't be an idiot."

    I'll ask again... Was #1 or #2 responsible for the Aurora shooting?

     
  • Mike Adams posted at 6:07 pm on Thu, Aug 16, 2012.

    Mike Adams Posts: 1362

    The first amendment implies I can speak freely and especially I can speak freely about the Blimp. Him being a liberal has absolutely nothing to do with my political affiliations or even myself being a "liberal". This is typical of the kind of low level intellect you bring to the table when your on your own. Maybe you should go back to stealing other people's writings 'cause what you're doing surely isn't working.

    As for Aurora, I have already posted thoughts about it, even here, but again typical you, you're so blinded by rage you don't notice it. But I do see you hooked up with another kooky conspiracy web site that claims the shooter was either not the shooter or that the shooter had to have help to pull off his diabolical plan.
    Whatever, it matters not what the truth is because nuts like you always consider another motive or reason, really anything the more conspiratorial, the better. Please repeat your pos....I mean stealing other peoples thoughts and words to go on and on about a topic no one cares about now. Go see that Batman movie. I hear the villian is named "Bain". Just like Knute Romney's old employer. Another attempt by the liberal press and entertainment industry to sway public perception of conservatives as evil arch villins. Be sure to sit by an exit door.

     
  • Mike Adams posted at 6:15 pm on Wed, Aug 15, 2012.

    Mike Adams Posts: 1362

    I've noticed your high leader Rush Limblimp even steers clear of idiot conspiracy theorists. At the first mention of "jewish bankers" or "the bilderbergs", he hangs up.
    So I'm guessing even he sees your kind as nothing more than nuts or kooks.

    You can spare me the lecture about the blimp not being a conservative or being a neo-conservative or any other category you might use to disassociate yourself. The fact is the blimp is actually a liberal who just puts on an act to garner huge ratings, and conservatives fall for it. How do you think he knows liberals like the "back of his hand"? Because he is one!

    But back to you, I see your last post was entirely your own. It wasn't till the last word you went above three syllables. But a good effort even if you critiqued my previous posts incorrectly. I'm not sure "weasel" is profanity, or maybe you are just profane, but I was continually blocked. At least they don't pull my comments.


     
  • Andrew Liebich posted at 6:52 pm on Tue, Aug 14, 2012.

    Andrew Liebich Posts: 2999

    Someone toss Mike a life preserver... He's drowning in his own stupidity... [lol]

     
  • Mike Adams posted at 6:27 pm on Tue, Aug 14, 2012.

    Mike Adams Posts: 1362

    What profanity?

     
  • Mike Adams posted at 6:26 pm on Tue, Aug 14, 2012.

    Mike Adams Posts: 1362

    Yes, that's what I'm saying. No, it's not. Don't be an idiot.


     
  • Mike Adams posted at 6:25 pm on Tue, Aug 14, 2012.

    Mike Adams Posts: 1362


    Well maybe I'll believe it's true if you can get 178 heads of State to agree that the whole shoot up thing was an elaborate plan to institute agenda 21. I'm sure all of the 178 heads of State must be experts on this topic as well, what with your whole vetting process.


     
  • Mike Adams posted at 6:24 pm on Tue, Aug 14, 2012.

    Mike Adams Posts: 1362

    [wink]

     
  • Andrew Liebich posted at 2:52 pm on Tue, Aug 14, 2012.

    Andrew Liebich Posts: 2999

    Steve has already refused to look at the jpeg. Try to pay attention Mike... [sleeping]

    Curious, Are you actually suggesting they are the same person? [sleeping]

     
  • Mike Adams posted at 1:27 pm on Tue, Aug 14, 2012.

    Mike Adams Posts: 1362

    Steve, You might get a kick out of this:

    weasel posted at 3:58 pm on Sun, Aug 12, 2012.
    Posts: 950
    Think...#1 or #2? Wakey wakey sheeple..

    http://www.thefreedomnetworkfrontlines.com/resources/James%20Holmes.jpeg

    You had to see it coming. That's right! Another conspiracy!! There's conspiracy everywhere!!

     
  • Joe Baxter posted at 6:38 pm on Mon, Aug 13, 2012.

    Joe Baxter Posts: 1843

    Darrell, you are correct. Sharia laws have made inroads in the American justice system thanks to the LIBERAL O-Blame-O administration and LIBERAL judges.

     
  • Joe Baxter posted at 6:33 pm on Mon, Aug 13, 2012.

    Joe Baxter Posts: 1843

    Andrew. excellent. Nothing agitators hate worse than being "ignored". It works better than anything you could possibly say.

     
  • Andrew Liebich posted at 5:48 pm on Mon, Aug 13, 2012.

    Andrew Liebich Posts: 2999

    [sleeping] Ignore...

     
  • Darrell Baumbach posted at 5:14 pm on Mon, Aug 13, 2012.

    Darrell Baumbach Posts: 9405

    Joe, to add to your thought, it is also the liberals who put down conservatives who fear Sharia Law infiltrating into our legal system. It is odd that anyone would draw a conclusion that conservatives in United States would embrace Sharia Law. Then again, that is very much expected with Steve's level of thinking.

     
  • Joe Baxter posted at 4:22 pm on Mon, Aug 13, 2012.

    Joe Baxter Posts: 1843

    Darrell, ya gotta wonder how some of these "braniacs" make it in life. Sharia Law in Viet Nam....None that I saw the first time there or when I went back a few years ago with a veterans group.

     
  • Joe Baxter posted at 3:42 pm on Mon, Aug 13, 2012.

    Joe Baxter Posts: 1843

    Oh no, the old "I'm rubber, your glue" routine from our very own self annointed genius.

     
  • Joe Baxter posted at 3:41 pm on Mon, Aug 13, 2012.

    Joe Baxter Posts: 1843

    Meh,,,,

     
  • Steve Schmidt posted at 3:38 pm on Mon, Aug 13, 2012.

    Steve Schmidt Posts: 2272

    I think the LNS was trying to avoid legal liability for your posts.

     
  • Darrell Baumbach posted at 2:53 pm on Mon, Aug 13, 2012.

    Darrell Baumbach Posts: 9405

    Viet Nam? Shia Law? Really

     
  • Andrew Liebich posted at 2:02 pm on Mon, Aug 13, 2012.

    Andrew Liebich Posts: 2999

    Please cite which section of the NDAA mushhead. [sleeping]

     
  • Andrew Liebich posted at 1:55 pm on Mon, Aug 13, 2012.

    Andrew Liebich Posts: 2999

    How long do we have to wait for you at the Post Office thread Ms. Bobin? I would love to hear more about your SDR denial. [sleeping]

     
  • Andrew Liebich posted at 12:29 pm on Mon, Aug 13, 2012.

    Andrew Liebich Posts: 2999

    Of course it had nothing at all to do with the fact that 29 of your 31 posts had nothing to do with the TOPIC Agenda 21. Perhaps someone at the LNS would be kind enough to set Mr. Schmidt straight.

     
  • Joanne Bobin posted at 12:22 pm on Mon, Aug 13, 2012.

    Joanne Bobin Posts: 4488

    The best part of the comment was "Andrew, some people are on these threads for the sole purpose of making personal attacks on anyone they don't agree with or agree with them."

    I think Mr. Baxter personifies this comment since he rarely contributes any opinions and seems to post comments only to support his fellow comrades or insult what he considers "liberal" positions.

     
  • Joanne Bobin posted at 12:19 pm on Mon, Aug 13, 2012.

    Joanne Bobin Posts: 4488

    Not really, Mr. Baxter. You acknowledged it - apparently not a smart as you think you are.

     
  • Joanne Bobin posted at 12:14 pm on Mon, Aug 13, 2012.

    Joanne Bobin Posts: 4488

    Good advice, Mr. Scmidt. When they come to round-up Andrew and his comrades under the direction of the NDAA, you don't want any of the url's to which he has directed the "sheeple" to show up on your computer or they'll put you away with him.

    Andrew - Mr. Chapman got deleted for using "mushhead" or some variation of "mush." Next you'll be whining about getting deleted for "some unknown reason."

     
  • Steve Schmidt posted at 10:14 am on Mon, Aug 13, 2012.

    Steve Schmidt Posts: 2272

    Many countries run by Islamic conservatives execute drug dealers in accordance with Shariah Law. It would not surprise me one bit if American conservatives moved to join their spiritual brethren.

     
  • Steve Schmidt posted at 7:58 am on Mon, Aug 13, 2012.

    Steve Schmidt Posts: 2272

    It looks like Andrew has killed yet another thread with his illegal plagiarism of copyrighted material.

     
  • Joe Baxter posted at 5:20 am on Mon, Aug 13, 2012.

    Joe Baxter Posts: 1843

    Andrew, you ask easy questions. They are called LIBERAL DEMOCRATS.

     
  • Andrew Liebich posted at 10:29 pm on Sun, Aug 12, 2012.

    Andrew Liebich Posts: 2999

    Just to clarify Joe... Is a mushhead someone who "doesn't know what the NDAA is and doesn't care" or someone who won't even look at a jpeg?
    [beam]

    What do you call a person who blndly believes whatever their television tells them?

     
  • Joe Baxter posted at 5:52 pm on Sun, Aug 12, 2012.

    Joe Baxter Posts: 1843

    [sleeping]Ignore....See how easy, Andrew?

     
  • Steve Schmidt posted at 5:19 pm on Sun, Aug 12, 2012.

    Steve Schmidt Posts: 2272

    Joe Baxter, the most open minded man on the planet wrote: "You are not going to change their mind about anything, especially when the liberal mush heads don't even bother to read what they promote or ridicule."

    Chuckle.... another week, another award for unintentional irony,

     
  • Steve Schmidt posted at 5:13 pm on Sun, Aug 12, 2012.

    Steve Schmidt Posts: 2272

    Given Andrew's demonstrated lack of ethics, I would exercise caution in following any links he might provide. Who knows what viruses might be lurking at the bottom of that rabbit hole.

     
  • Joe Baxter posted at 4:50 pm on Sun, Aug 12, 2012.

    Joe Baxter Posts: 1843

    Andrew, some people are on these threads for the sole purpose of making personal attacks on anyone they don't agree with or agree with them. State your opinions and don't give them the satisfaction of drawing you into an argument, it is exactly what they want. Simply ignore their grammar school tactics and you will be leaps and bounds above their childish actions. You are not going to change their mind about anything, especially when the liberal mush heads don't even bother to read what they promote or ridicule.

     
  • Andrew Liebich posted at 4:20 pm on Sun, Aug 12, 2012.

    Andrew Liebich Posts: 2999

    Excellent point [thumbup]

    Perhaps you could explain why Anwar al-Awlaqi was denied his right to due process.

     
  • Andrew Liebich posted at 3:58 pm on Sun, Aug 12, 2012.

    Andrew Liebich Posts: 2999


    Think...#1 or #2? Wakey wakey sheeple..

    http://www.thefreedomnetworkfrontlines.com/resources/James%20Holmes.jpeg

     
  • Andrew Liebich posted at 3:52 pm on Sun, Aug 12, 2012.

    Andrew Liebich Posts: 2999

    "I don't know what the NDAA is and don't care."... [sleeping]

    We know Mike.

     
  • Andrew Liebich posted at 3:40 pm on Sun, Aug 12, 2012.

    Andrew Liebich Posts: 2999

    Judge Forrest's May 16 order found Section 1021(b)(2) constitutionally invalid on two bases Ms. Bobin. The First Amendment and the due process clause of the Fifth Amendment. Do you know why this ruling was made Ms. Bobin?

    The ruling came in response to a lawsuit filed by the so-called "Freedom 7," a group of journalists and activists who had expressed concerns that the vaguely worded statute, contained in the act's Section 1021, could be applied to them during the course of their work.

    Where was I when GWB was torturing people and claiming he was getting great information during his total disregard for the Geneva Conventions?

    I was busy educating and informing just as I am today. http://youtu.be/qHQu-q3G4KM

    Yes, Ms. Bobin I am employed... [lol]

     
  • Joanne Bobin posted at 2:59 pm on Sun, Aug 12, 2012.

    Joanne Bobin Posts: 4488

    Andrew - which part of the NDAA negates the Constiutionally mandated right to due process?

    The NDAA, in case you missed it, would have allowed indefinite detention for American Citizens (and others - actually we already do that on Guantanamo) suspected of terrorism. However, there is a federal injunction against this section as the court stated it was unconstitutional.

    That's just a small part of the NDAA. It covers a great many other issues vital to national security. Where were you when GWB was torturing people and claiming he was getting great information during his total disregard for the Geneva Conventions?

    Andrew - do you have a REAL job? I suspect not since you seem to have a tremendous amount of time to "research" (if that's what you call it) and catalogue an infinite number of conspiracies. Or do you work all day and then hunker down in your Mom's basement all night, hyped up on mind-altering substances and trying to glean any tidbit that might add up to conspiracy?

    Either way, any one who lives their life like that is not normal by any standard of normalcy.

     
  • Steve Schmidt posted at 2:38 pm on Sun, Aug 12, 2012.

    Steve Schmidt Posts: 2272

    If anyone wants to know why we provide legal defense for people who appear to be guilty of heinous crimes, they need look no further than the case of Richard Jewell.

     
  • Mike Adams posted at 2:38 pm on Sun, Aug 12, 2012.

    Mike Adams Posts: 1362

    The weeping is your manic depression coming on. Take your medicine. And maybe a lot of alcohol then maybe for once you'll have not only some shame, but also something you've done on your own.

    As an American citizen, one who has actually sworn to uphold the Constitution (unlike you who has only had to pretend to salute it) my freedom to take part in the normal every day dealings of government or not to is something I am free to choose. I don't need to apologize for it, nor get approval. You on the other hand just wreck around, not caring what the results are of your immature and thugish actions. Our oath, which has to be notarized and signed, also protects people like you even when they act like a complete idiot like you do.

    You are embarrassing yourself and all the other nutty conspiracy theorists. I would guess Darrell is ashamed by your actions as well. Although I disagree with him most of the time, it is a free country and if he wants to defend you he is free to do so. You should appreciate that he is willing to tarnish his image and respect that he has earned here. You should really be experiencing shame for your actions the last year or so.

     
  • Andrew Liebich posted at 12:06 pm on Sun, Aug 12, 2012.

    Andrew Liebich Posts: 2999

    WOW! A true testament of how dumbed down willfuly ignorant and mentally oblivious the average American has become... [sleeping]

    "I don't know what the NDAA is and don't care." [sleeping]

    Does our Constitution and Bill of Rights mean nothing to you? [sleeping]

    I weep for you Mike...I sincerely do...

     
  • Mike Adams posted at 10:54 am on Sun, Aug 12, 2012.

    Mike Adams Posts: 1362

    I, of course, am not obligated to answer any query you may make. It wouldn't make any difference anyway. I don't know what the NDAA is and don't care. I'll leave the miniscule details to those who obsess about all things conspiracy, such as yourself. I couldn't care less what you think about me as you are irrelevant. But stick around. You keep the rest of us entertained, especially since Dan Hutchins is off running his own country.

    It doesn't surprise me that you take issue with a defendant being afforded the opportunity for a fair trial. You should go rent "Giddeon's Trumpet" and complain the whole time. You've charged and conducted your own little mini-trials here and other places for some time. It doesn't matter that those you have accused and convicted in your own little conspiracy courts do no jail time or pay any fines. This merely demonstrates how weak the conspiracy movement is. Other than for the humor value, conspiracy theorists (such as yourself) don't change a lot of minds.

     
  • Andrew Liebich posted at 1:27 am on Sun, Aug 12, 2012.

    Andrew Liebich Posts: 2999

    Maybe they were some of your "gay space aliens" Mr. Schmidt. Irrelevant.
    The point is, the "official story" has been officially debunked but you still actually believe it.

     
  • Joanne Bobin posted at 11:45 pm on Sat, Aug 11, 2012.

    Joanne Bobin Posts: 4488

    Beat me to it, Mr. Schmidt.....

     
  • Mike Adams posted at 5:50 pm on Sat, Aug 11, 2012.

    Mike Adams Posts: 1362

    HHhhhmmmmm.....so those accused of a crime are not eligible for vigorous defense?
    Even Oxycontin popping Rush Limbaugh hired a top-notch defense lawyer when his game was up.

    Is there a protocol that needs to be followed in situations like this? Is there a list you go by, the best defense lawyers on top, the mutts at the bottom? Depending on who you are and your social and financial status the decision tree indicates the level of defense attorney you can get? If the writer was accused of a crime, would he be able to hire any attorney he could afford or just the ones handle potential clients in his income and position strata?

    Really, the only thing that makes this premise seem totally bizarre are the suggestions that either someone else committed these crimes or that the shooter had help in carrying off the assult. That would mean that IT IS A CONSPIRACY!!!
    And not to disappoint, this is where people like the weasel come in. BTW, see the article I supposedly wrote for some conspiracy web stie where apparently, I was the first to propose a second shooter/outside help plank of this latest government effort to control....everything.

     
  • Joe Baxter posted at 5:32 pm on Sat, Aug 11, 2012.

    Joe Baxter Posts: 1843

    Uh oh, the Black Cat is slipping, forgot her all time favorite word, BIGOT.

     
  • Steve Schmidt posted at 5:02 pm on Sat, Aug 11, 2012.

    Steve Schmidt Posts: 2272

    Dave Howard wrote: "Now I know there are two intelligence people
    in calif."

    Best unintentionally ironic post of the week!

     
  • dave howard posted at 4:44 pm on Sat, Aug 11, 2012.

    dave howard Posts: 25

    Thanks Robert I could not have said it any better.
    You are 100% right the liberals laws in california
    have made companys move to other states over
    hi taxes and look at Stockton with it's high murder
    rate.
    Now I know there are two intelligence people
    in calif.
    now if we had just a few more with a little common
    sense in sacramento maybe we could turn things
    around here in calicornia.

     
  • Steve Schmidt posted at 1:08 pm on Sat, Aug 11, 2012.

    Steve Schmidt Posts: 2272

    Andrew, you stop posting your tin foil bedecked hallucinations and I will stop calling you delusional.

    With the exception of your comments about your niece's babysitter, you haven't posted anything with a direct connection to reality since you showed up here.

     
  • Steve Schmidt posted at 12:03 pm on Sat, Aug 11, 2012.

    Steve Schmidt Posts: 2272

    Is there any issue in this country that Mr. Liebich does not attribute to a conspiracy?

    Q: Andrew, who let their dog pooop on my lawn?

    A: Mr Schmidt, you must be a complete idiot if you don't see that it was a conspiracy of the UN, the Orbital Mind Control Lasers and the Methodist Church.

    And to think that there are people on these fora that take this guy seriously!

     
  • Steve Schmidt posted at 11:59 am on Sat, Aug 11, 2012.

    Steve Schmidt Posts: 2272

    Chuckle.... I don't know Andrew, was it Elvis?

     
  • Joanne Bobin posted at 10:26 am on Sat, Aug 11, 2012.

    Joanne Bobin Posts: 4488

    So the letter writer wants to scrap the Constitutional protections to due process in favor of "Judge Roy Bean" justice?

    Sorry, Mr. Wolford - you've been watching too many Paul Newman movies. Bean was nothing more than a bully saloon keeper, profiteer and a racist.

    And really, any mentally disturbed person who commits these types of crimes (or racially motivated individual as in the Sikh murders in Wisconsin), most likely does not think through what his "options" are.

     
  • Andrew Liebich posted at 9:30 am on Sat, Aug 11, 2012.

    Andrew Liebich Posts: 2999

    Perhaps you should re-read Mr. Wolfords letter Walter...

    "The liberal justice system is just as much to blame in the shootings in Aurora, Colo. as the person who committed the crime."

    [sleeping]

     
  • Walter Chang posted at 9:03 am on Sat, Aug 11, 2012.

    Walt Posts: 1109

    [offtopic]

    [thumbdown][thumbdown][thumbdown]

    [beam]

     
  • Andrew Liebich posted at 9:00 am on Sat, Aug 11, 2012.

    Andrew Liebich Posts: 2999

    ABC News as well as other corporate media outlets initially reported multiple suspects before the official “story” was fed into the newsrooms by government and law enforcement officials.

    Emergency 9/11 audio proves there were multiple shooters. [sleeping]

    Who helped shooter Holmes coordinate his attack with a cell phone call and then opened up the emergency door for him to enter? This question is based on eye witness account of a survivor.

    TURN OFF YOUR TELEVISION! The truth will not be televised.

     
  • Andy Crowder posted at 8:17 am on Sat, Aug 11, 2012.

    Andy Crowder Posts: 245

    Today's tinfoilhatery.

     
  • Andrew Liebich posted at 7:50 am on Sat, Aug 11, 2012.

    Andrew Liebich Posts: 2999

    Who left a second gas mask at the back of the theater after the shootings?

    [sleeping]

     

Recent Comments

Posted 4 hours ago by Jien Kaur.

article: Letter: We must deal with Islamic State…

I was not here in UniteD States in time when the president Bush call for invasion of the Iraq. Many countrys were very very against him. …

More...

Posted 5 hours ago by Thomas Heuer.

article: Letter: Fireworks — when will they stop?

Lets see I lost count of all the LTEs complaining about the fireworks. But this one saying lets do it for the troops has got to be the late…

More...

Posted 5 hours ago by Thomas Heuer.

article: Letter: We must deal with Islamic State…

There has never been a similar situation where I truly felt simultaneous disgust, malice and revulsion toward a group of people as I do for…

More...

Posted 5 hours ago by Michael Nedderman.

article: Letter: Thanks for the discussion on th…

Your answer and comments are most welcome, M, especially since your answer confirms what I suspected about you. I hope you aren't so clos…

More...

Posted 5 hours ago by Kevin Paglia.

article: Letter: Thanks for the discussion on th…

I should learn to refer to others to explain what I mean. This is a real world explanation of what I was trying to say http://www.near-de…

More...

Video

Popular Stories

Poll

Loading…

Your News

News for the community, by the community.

Mailing List

Subscribe to a mailing list to have daily news sent directly to your inbox.

  • Breaking News

    Would you like to receive breaking news alerts? Sign up now!

  • News Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily news headlines? Sign up now!

  • Sports Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily sports headlines? Sign up now!

Manage Your Lists