default avatar
Welcome to the site! Login or Signup below.
Logout|My Dashboard

Editorial: Police statements on Parminder Shergill case provide fresh, valuable clarity

Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size

Related Documents

Posted: Friday, August 15, 2014 10:20 pm

The release this past week of statements by the two Lodi police officers who shot Parminder Shergill in January provided new clarity in the case.

If the statements had been released earlier, they would have informed and perhaps calmed the community.

The statements show why the police officers did what they did. They paint a picture of careful observation and deliberate decision-making. The interviews also reveal the agitation Shergill was experiencing.

Although some witnesses question whether Shergill rushed at the officers, the officers’ descriptions of the lightning-quick incident are precise and consistent.

It is not our place to render the final judgment in this tragedy, but we are sure that the public is better informed having the officers’ statements to consider.

Which brings us back to the question we have tried to push before the public and officials since Shergill’s death: Wouldn’t it be better if government didn’t slam the lid on the evidence when police officers take the life of a citizen?

Lodi has been spared the violence that inflamed Ferguson, Mo. this past week. When 18-year-old Michael Brown, who is black, was shot by a white police officer, that community erupted in protest and violence.

Shergill was from a Sikh family and his family, friends and attorney have strongly questioned police tactics and judgment. Despite the anger among Sikhs and those who sympathize, Lodi has remained peaceful. Expressions of doubt about police actions have been civil.

Peace is being restored in Ferguson largely because the local police have been replaced by a Missouri State Highway Patrol unit with black leaders who have begun communicating with protesters.

But another quieting move in the Missouri case has been the release of more information. In Ferguson as in Lodi, openness has played a part in calming the anger that almost inevitably follows these incidents.

Yes, police officers deserve a “fair trial” just as all accused and all litigants do. But there is much more at stake in these situations than assuring that jurors are untainted and therefore ignorant of the facts before entering a courtroom.

Long before the legal battles shape up, the shock of a police shooting creates a widespread rush to judgment in every community.

Sharing the results of ongoing investigations can go a long way to restoring trust by the people in their police.

More about

More about

More about

Rules of Conduct

  • 1 Use your real name. You must register with your full first and last name before you can comment. (And don’t pretend you’re someone else.)
  • 2 Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually oriented language.
  • 3 Don’t threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
  • 4 Be truthful. Don't lie about anyone or anything. Don't post unsubstantiated allegations, rumors or gossip that could harm the reputation of a person, company or organization.
  • 5 Be nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
  • 6 Stay on topic. Make sure your comments are about the story. Don’t insult each other.
  • 7 Tell us if the discussion is getting out of hand. Use the ‘Report’ link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
  • 8 Share what you know, and ask about what you don't.
  • 9 Don’t be a troll.
  • 10 Don’t reveal personal information about other commenters. You may reveal your own personal information, but we advise you not to do so.
  • 11 We reserve the right, at our discretion, to monitor, delete or choose not to post any comment. This may include removing or monitoring posts that we believe violate the spirit or letter of these rules, or that we otherwise determine at our discretion needs to be monitored, not posted, or deleted.

Welcome to the discussion.

1 comment:

  • M. Doyle posted at 6:15 pm on Sat, Aug 16, 2014.

    M Doyle Posts: 180

    I do not think that ANYONE had their trust in the Ferguson PD restored by the release of information.


Recent Comments

Posted 21 hours ago by Mike Adams.

article: Letter: Release of CIA interrogation me…

What do you want to bet, terrorists the world over know our methods. The only ones who are expressing wonderment are those who don't like …


Posted 22 hours ago by Shane Marcus.

article: Letter: Michael Brown started events th…

The following is the last sentence in the first paragraph of this story: "He himself put into motion a series of events that ended his…


Posted 23 hours ago by Todd Cronin.

article: Letter: Release of CIA interrogation me…

***GOD & COUNTRY*** That's right mike we will show them heathens who owns it !!!


Posted Yesterday by Thomas Heuer.

article: Letter: What about others who break the…

Jien Thanks. I heard this on TV news and wanted to look it up but you saved me the effort. The Brown family is hoping to get the court to o…


Posted Yesterday by Thomas Heuer.

article: Letter: Michael Brown started events th…

Ed, Is there some one you can have proof your writing? Where do you begin with this letter? I would need to... But then... So never mind…



Popular Stories



Your News

News for the community, by the community.

Mailing List

Subscribe to a mailing list to have daily news sent directly to your inbox.

  • Breaking News

    Would you like to receive breaking news alerts? Sign up now!

  • News Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily news headlines? Sign up now!

  • Sports Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily sports headlines? Sign up now!

Manage Your Lists