Lodinews.com

default avatar
Welcome to the site! Login or Signup below.
|
||
Logout|My Dashboard

Charter school applications: Lodi Unified must be strict but fair

Print
Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size

Posted: Saturday, January 23, 2010 12:00 am

Should a low-key school that serves mainly disadvantaged teens be brought under the umbrella of Lodi Unified School District?

Leaders of the Heritage Peak learning center on Lower Sacramento Road have applied to operate as a charter school in Lodi Unified.

The petition poses a variety of difficult questions.

Among them:

— Would another local charter school open the gate to more area students attending Heritage Peak (which would become Rio Valley Charter School) and cause Lodi Unified to lose money?

— Would an expansion at Heritage Peak come with the strength of staff, oversight and curriculum?

— Would it provide a distinctive and attractive alternative to other area schools?

Lodi Unified already operates one charter school, Joe Serna Jr., and it provides oversight for three others operated by Aspire Schools.

What are charter schools? They're publicly funded ventures that run with more flexibility than traditional public campuses. There is less red tape, more latitude in terms of textbooks, schedules and regulation. Though they operate with a fair degree of independence, they are required to be chartered through a school district, county office of education or the state Department of Education. The overseeing agencies can receive fees for certain administrative or special services related to the schools they charter.

Today, there are 809 charter schools serving more than 341,000 students in California.

Charter schools have gained popularity because they can be more personal, more customized and, in some cases, more academically successful than their traditional counterparts.

The California Charter Schools Association boasts that, on average, students in charter schools achieve higher test scores than those at mainline public schools.

In Lodi Unified, the charters operated by Aspire public schools are, in fact, high achievers, with River Oaks Charter, University Public and Ben Holt College Prep reflecting among the very best scores in the district.

So charter schools can and do succeed.

Lodi Unified has received petitions for two charters in recent months, one from Heritage Peak and one from local educational advocate Robert Closson. The district rejected Closson's petition and is taking a very hard look at the Heritage Peak idea.

By carefully reviewing these petitions, Lodi Unified is doing a public service. After all, taxpayer money shouldn't be flung willy-nilly at just any group of educational reformers.

The new school, ideally, should offer a fresh and different choice to local parents and students.

And students shouldn't be entrusted to taxpayer-supported schools that lack a solid plan of infrastructure.

Yet Lodi Unified, like many cash-strapped districts these days, is in a sticky position. It might be financially wounded by a school it has the power to reject or accept. (The district, by law, is not supposed to consider whether it will take a financial hit by granting a charter.)

Still, there is at least the hint of a conflict of interest in such processes. Every student that a new charter pulls away could cost Lodi Unified $5,200 in average daily attendance revenue. There are safeguards aimed at providing a fair hearing for charters. For instance, if Heritage Peak is rejected by Lodi Unified, it could appeal to the San Joaquin County Office of Education, which could decide it passes muster and charter it directly. If the county rejects it, too, Heritage could go to Sacramento and seek a charter through the state department of education.

So school districts that reject charters do so with some risk — the risk that the charter may succeed anyway, in which case the rejecting district has virtually no control over it, and no chance at administrative or other fees.

Lodi Unified is right to be scrupulous in its review of Heritage Oaks and other charter petitions.

Yet district leaders would be wise to be open-minded and impeccably fair, too.

— The Lodi News-Sentinel

Rules of Conduct

  • 1 Use your real name. You must register with your full first and last name before you can comment. (And don’t pretend you’re someone else.)
  • 2 Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually oriented language.
  • 3 Don’t threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
  • 4 Be truthful. Don't lie about anyone or anything. Don't post unsubstantiated allegations, rumors or gossip that could harm the reputation of a person, company or organization.
  • 5 Be nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
  • 6 Stay on topic. Make sure your comments are about the story. Don’t insult each other.
  • 7 Tell us if the discussion is getting out of hand. Use the ‘Report’ link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
  • 8 Share what you know, and ask about what you don't.
  • 9 Don’t be a troll.
  • 10 Don’t reveal personal information about other commenters. You may reveal your own personal information, but we advise you not to do so.
  • 11 We reserve the right, at our discretion, to monitor, delete or choose not to post any comment. This may include removing or monitoring posts that we believe violate the spirit or letter of these rules, or that we otherwise determine at our discretion needs to be monitored, not posted, or deleted.

Welcome to the discussion.

2 comments:

  • posted at 5:29 am on Thu, Jan 28, 2010.

    Posts:

    LUSD needs to look no further than the heading "Aspire Schools" and the infamous former LUSD charlatan Don Shalvey to see what is wrong with what is happening.

     
  • posted at 11:08 am on Mon, Jan 25, 2010.

    Posts:

    It is my understanding that a school district has no choice on whether to accept or reject an application, except for a very limited set of criteria. I was told that there are only about 4 allowed criteria for rejection.Credibility is not among one of them, but I suppose they should have a plan.Each charter school is different and they can't be stereotyped.

     

Recent Comments

Posted 14 hours ago by Kenneth Huntley.

article: City of Lodi to hire sign consultant fo…

I would take this story more seriously if it was about San Francisco or Sacramento. Again, this is Lodi, a small community. It only takes 1…

More...

Posted 15 hours ago by Kevin Paglia.

article: Letter: U.S. suffers from total lack of…

In Cleveland a VIOLENT gang has now declared war on ALL white cops. This is a product of Liberal social leaders, liberalet media and liber…

More...

Posted 15 hours ago by Jien Kaur.

article: Letter: U.S. suffers from total lack of…

Mr Paglia your frenzy to be right about liberals clouds your objective thinking. How can you prove that liberals have made people into a f…

More...

Posted 17 hours ago by Ed Walters.

article: Letter: U.S. suffers from total lack of…

This entire subject, bla, bla, bla, bla, as Chang would say [sleeping] [whistling]. And for you information Kaur, you ass/umed I was …

More...

Posted 17 hours ago by Kenneth Huntley.

article: City of Lodi to hire sign consultant fo…

Downtown Lodi is not easy to find? Really?! This is a small city, a small city. It takes only 10 to 15 minutes to get from one side of Lodi…

More...

Video

Popular Stories

Poll

Loading…

Your News

News for the community, by the community.

Mailing List

Subscribe to a mailing list to have daily news sent directly to your inbox.

  • Breaking News

    Would you like to receive breaking news alerts? Sign up now!

  • News Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily news headlines? Sign up now!

  • Sports Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily sports headlines? Sign up now!

Manage Your Lists