default avatar
Welcome to the site! Login or Signup below.
Logout|My Dashboard

Water district has plenty of resources

Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size

Posted: Friday, August 28, 2009 10:00 pm

Seven honest and able people have stepped forward and offered to continue the work of the North San Joaquin Water Conservation District.

Sometimes all the thanks you get in a difficult struggle is someone willing to carry on when you can't.

Fred Weybret, 85, our chairman, worked 33 years trying to bring more water from the Mokelumne River to the surrounding area to save our declining well water.

We are proud of his effort, but it has been a frustrating grind. Without even enough money to maintain its aging system of ditches and pipes, there never seemed a time when NSJWCD could expand its deliveries or pursue an initiative that might arrest the perilous decline in our water table.

In the summer of 2007, with the district's precious "wet year" water right openly questioned by the state authorities, directors ran out of time and cheap ideas. They made the difficult decision to levy a fee on wells.

NSJWCD directors avoided pump charges for years, knowing it would be unpopular. They are probably guilty of underestimating the community resentment.

When Weybret's hearing problems finally reached a point where he could not contribute, he reluctantly resigned. It felt like jumping off a horse in the middle of a creek. There was no way to know who would jump back in the saddle and take up the cause he cared so much about.

But when the job was advertised as vacant, something very gratifying happened. Seven people applied - Mark Beck, Larry Mackey, Eileen St. Yves and Martin Church, all of Acampo, and Neal Colwell, Fran Forkas and Richard Prima, of Lodi.

All seem committed to protecting underground water. Colwell, Forkas and Prima have professional experience with water.

For once, NSJWCD has plenty of resources to work with.

We must all be thankful that the volunteer spirit lives on in Lodi.

- Lodi News-Sentinel

Rules of Conduct

  • 1 Use your real name. You must register with your full first and last name before you can comment. (And don’t pretend you’re someone else.)
  • 2 Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually oriented language.
  • 3 Don’t threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
  • 4 Be truthful. Don't lie about anyone or anything. Don't post unsubstantiated allegations, rumors or gossip that could harm the reputation of a person, company or organization.
  • 5 Be nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
  • 6 Stay on topic. Make sure your comments are about the story. Don’t insult each other.
  • 7 Tell us if the discussion is getting out of hand. Use the ‘Report’ link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
  • 8 Share what you know, and ask about what you don't.
  • 9 Don’t be a troll.
  • 10 Don’t reveal personal information about other commenters. You may reveal your own personal information, but we advise you not to do so.
  • 11 We reserve the right, at our discretion, to monitor, delete or choose not to post any comment. This may include removing or monitoring posts that we believe violate the spirit or letter of these rules, or that we otherwise determine at our discretion needs to be monitored, not posted, or deleted.

Welcome to the discussion.

1 comment:

  • posted at 4:08 am on Sat, Aug 29, 2009.


    I have followed the stories and activities of the NSJWD for some time. I strongly support their efforts to use the districts water allocation to recharge the area aquifer. This plan not only protects area water rights, it is far less expensive than the plan our great city council has in store for us.The city has allocated a million dollars--just to develop plans for a forty million dollar water treatment plant so the millions of dollars worth of water they have already bought and paid the Woodbridge Irrigation District for, can flow into the local water grid.It seems to me, if this water and the NSJWD water could be delivered to the area aquifer, via recharge systems, the cost of the water treatment plant and the ongoing costs of operating it may be avoided---at least until we can afford it.Larry Hansen is championing the plan to build a water treatment plant. Based on my research and considering city management's capabilities and track record, I support the NSJWD recharge plan. I am violently opposed to spending the money to build a water treatment plant.


Recent Comments

Posted 52 minutes ago by Steve Schmidt.

article: Letter: Our leaders need to be better r…

I would like to thank Brian Dockter for his kind gift to me of "A Conservative's Guide to Posting on the Internet" by B.S. Slosch…


Posted 55 minutes ago by Steve Schmidt.

article: Letter: Our leaders need to be better r…

Conservatism is a mental illness.


Posted 59 minutes ago by Steve Schmidt.

article: Letter: Our leaders need to be better r…

John Kinseth, can you please explain to me why conservatives hate America?


Posted 1 hour ago by Steve Schmidt.

article: Letter: Our leaders need to be better r…

Will Rainwater, as William van Amber Fields dear old dad used to say, I feel your hate.


Posted 1 hour ago by Kevin Paglia.

article: Letter: Our leaders need to be better r…

Yes, because we all know Liberal leadership NEVER does anything wrong. They are the pinnacles of human evolution and far above reproach. …



Popular Stories



Your News

News for the community, by the community.

Mailing List

Subscribe to a mailing list to have daily news sent directly to your inbox.

  • Breaking News

    Would you like to receive breaking news alerts? Sign up now!

  • News Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily news headlines? Sign up now!

  • Sports Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily sports headlines? Sign up now!

Manage Your Lists