Lodinews.com

default avatar
Welcome to the site! Login or Signup below.
|
||
Logout|My Dashboard

Government’s use of drones demands more scrutiny

Print
Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size

Posted: Saturday, February 9, 2013 12:00 am

"It has become appallingly obvious that our technology has exceeded our humanity." — Albert Einstein

A front-page story in the News-Sentinel this week stated: "Congress abuzz over drones."

The cover of Time magazine this week featured the headline, "Rise of the drones."

What is all the fuss? And should we in Lodi, Calif. really be concerned about these machines, otherwise known as UAVs, or Unmanned Aerial Vehicles?

We should.

We know our government has developed a fleet of very sophisticated machines that fly, without human pilots, and kill reputed enemies. Those targets have included American citizens.

These drones can fly long distances and stay in the air for many hours — sometimes days

They are aerial warships, operated long-distance from bases in the deserts of Southern California and Nevada.

They have been a weapon of choice under the Obama administration for destroying militants outside of Iraq and Afghanistan, most notably in Pakistan and Yemen. A 2011 drone attack in Yemen killed two Americans, Anwar al-Awlaki and Samir Khan, both suspected of being involved in al-Qaida.

The CIA and U.S. military maintain overlapping "kill lists" of potential targets for drone attacks. But the process of choosing who is to be taken out by drones and the justification for long-distance assassination remains unclear. It appears the director of the CIA can personally authorize drone hits in some cases. In others, it is left to the president.

The excellent investigative reporting site ProPublica searched for answers regarding the military and CIA's use of drones. Their results were sketchy.

We do not, for instance, know how many people have been killed by U.S. drone strikes, though estimates range to 3,000. We don't know how many of those killed were civilians, either.

Even some of those directly targeted are never fully identified, taken out simply because their pattern of behavior convinces federal authorities they are involved in militant or terrorist activities. These are called "signature strikes."

The government has indicated that militants are targeted for death-by-drone when they pose an imminent threat to the U.S. and capture isn't feasible. Yet, according to ProPublica, drone killings seem more common than capture, in part because overseas capture raises a welter of diplomatic and legal uncertainties.

The ascent of the drone has raised the term "asymmetrical dynamic," meaning that drone masters, in climate-controlled spaces, bear little consequence of their actions compared to their targets.

Our increasing use of drones hasn't won many friends in the countries where the menacing machines operate.

A 2012 study by Stanford and New York University, titled "Living Under Drones," reveals how people are afflicted by these weapons. One of the researchers, Jennifer Gibson, wrote an opinion piece in the Los Angeles Times.

"People in the United States imagine that drones fly to a target, launch their deadly missile with surgical precision and return to a U.S. base hundreds or thousands of miles away," she writes.

"But drones are a constant presence in the skies above the North Waziristan tribal area in Pakistan, with as many as six hovering over villages at any one time. People hear them day and night. They are an inescapable presence, the looming specter of death from above.

"And that presence is destroying a community ... parents are afraid to send their children to school. Women are afraid to meet in markets. Families are afraid to gather at a funeral for people wrongly killed in earlier strikes."

So it would seem a fair question: Do drones help extinguish terror?

Or do they incite it?

Another question: Does the war with drones reflect a war on terror or a war of terror?

If Pakistan were to launch a fleet of drones to take out perceived enemies in California, would we tolerate it?

This week, President Obama's nominee to be the next CIA director, Paul Brennan, defended the use of drones as an effective and relatively precise weapon against terror. He contends the American people have been misinformed about drones and their use by the current administration.

We beg to differ.

The American people deserve to learn much more about these robotic killing machines, which have been unleashed by masters who remain largely in the shadows.

We have good reason to be skeptical of the administration's reassurance regarding the rise of drones.

They are nimble and deadly and their use may very well have outstripped our humble human ability to fathom the horribly complex damage they do.

The turmoil over drones reminds us of bumper sticker we saw around Lodi a number of years back: "I love my country — but fear my government."

Rules of Conduct

  • 1 Use your real name. You must register with your full first and last name before you can comment. (And don’t pretend you’re someone else.)
  • 2 Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually oriented language.
  • 3 Don’t threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
  • 4 Be truthful. Don't lie about anyone or anything. Don't post unsubstantiated allegations, rumors or gossip that could harm the reputation of a person, company or organization.
  • 5 Be nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
  • 6 Stay on topic. Make sure your comments are about the story. Don’t insult each other.
  • 7 Tell us if the discussion is getting out of hand. Use the ‘Report’ link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
  • 8 Share what you know, and ask about what you don't.
  • 9 Don’t be a troll.
  • 10 Don’t reveal personal information about other commenters. You may reveal your own personal information, but we advise you not to do so.
  • 11 We reserve the right, at our discretion, to monitor, delete or choose not to post any comment. This may include removing or monitoring posts that we believe violate the spirit or letter of these rules, or that we otherwise determine at our discretion needs to be monitored, not posted, or deleted.

Welcome to the discussion.

3 comments:

  • Geral Sosbee posted at 9:10 am on Wed, Feb 13, 2013.

    gsosbee Posts: 2

    Drones are part of global police state where criminals must be manufactured.

    http://la.indymedia.org/news/2013/02/258313.php

    http://www.cbusimc.org/node/86930

    Hate mesages to me from fbi, police supporter or operative:


    http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2013/02/421750.shtml?discuss


    http://sosbeevfbi.ning.com/profiles/blogs/multiple-hate-messages-from-monique-abu-jamal?xg_source=activity

     
  • Andrew Liebich posted at 9:10 am on Mon, Feb 11, 2013.

    Andrew Liebich Posts: 2999

    How can the DOJ “ensure fair and impartial administration of justice for all Americans” as its mission statement claims it must when it is calling for the outright extrajudicial slaying of American citizens?

     
  • Patrick W Maple posted at 10:20 am on Sun, Feb 10, 2013.

    Pat Maple Posts: 1805

    bo seems to be taking a page from the Viet Nam era..." Kill 'em all and let God sort it out." Lies, lies, and more lies...espoused by hc, jk, eh, re, tl and the rest of the "transparent" a--es he has surrounded himself with. Next!

     

Recent Comments

Posted 14 hours ago by Ed Walters.

article: Letter: What is President Obama thinkin…

If everything said about Portal is correct, it is most difficult to bypass the Rev. Wright, I do recall Barry dumping him for various re…

More...

Posted 17 hours ago by Kamran A.

article: Lodi Citizens in Action to discuss Shar…

Ok, I'll play along... Let's have you really smart person explain to us how me (or anyone else) having a particular belief is "insult…

More...

Posted Yesterday by Mike Adams.

article: Steve Hansen: Over-regulated medication…

You ever price eye drops prior to some sort of opthalmic procedure? For a 0.10 ml bottle of something you can't ever use again? They've g…

More...

Posted Yesterday by Rick Houdack.

article: Letter: What is President Obama thinkin…

Apparently Ron Portal does not believe bearing false witness is a sin or, more likely, he feels his God hates all the same people he does, …

More...

Posted Yesterday by Mike Adams.

article: Letter: What is President Obama thinkin…

Let us give thanks today. Thanks for an especially angry rant from a crackpot who gets his views of the world from fox news, rush limbaugh…

More...

Video

Popular Stories

Poll

Loading…

Your News

News for the community, by the community.

Featured Events

CREATE AN EVENT

Mailing List

Subscribe to a mailing list to have daily news sent directly to your inbox.

  • Breaking News

    Would you like to receive breaking news alerts? Sign up now!

  • News Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily news headlines? Sign up now!

  • Sports Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily sports headlines? Sign up now!

Manage Your Lists