Lodinews.com

default avatar
Welcome to the site! Login or Signup below.
|
||
Logout|My Dashboard

Editorial: Some options for trimming Lodi City Council costs

Print
Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size

Posted: Saturday, March 8, 2014 12:00 am

Is compensation for the Lodi City Council outrageous? No. Should it be trimmed? Absolutely.

Our recent series on council pay and compensation by reporter Katie Nelson was an eye-opener. We’re sure many citizens and taxpayers were not aware that the costs associated with the council have risen steadily over the years, driven in large measure by the soaring costs of health insurance.

Tally up the stipends, pension contributions and various insurance coverages, and the amount is substantial: $128,000 in 2012.

Nelson’s work also showed some council members travel regularly out of town, mainly to conferences. Those costs are, with a few exceptions, borne by the taxpayers. Moreover, no one approves those travel expenses; council members are pretty much free to go where they wish, with no oversight.

Council costs have crept upward across California, not just in Lodi. Yet they aren’t often or easily revealed — or explained

We should stop here and acknowledge that city officials were quite responsive to our requests for financial data.

Deciphering the information, though, proved quite a challenge.

One payment of $5,908 to Councilman Alan Nakanishi, for example, was especially difficult to unravel. It had apparently been reported to us in error and efforts to explain it were never entirely clear.

This is an area that needs more sunshine, and more simplicity.

It is also an area where some nipping and tucking is overdue. Our suggestions:

  • Let’s keep the stipend of $860 per month per council member. That’s reasonable and reflects limits imposed by state law based on a city’s population. We know and appreciate that some council members put in many hours each week, and for them council duty may rival a full-time job. Traditionally, and for most members, though, serving on the council has been a part-time position. The stipend, and little more, should suffice.
  • Drop pension eligibility for council members. As far as we could determine, only one council member is drawing a pension based on her service, and it is modest. But the contributions of roughly $2,000 to CalPERS per year per eligible council member by the city add up over time. Should council service, driven by a sense of laudable civic spirit, really equal a pension? We’re among those who don’t believe so.
  • A major driver of council costs is health insurance. These costs are both variable and substantial. If we as a city continue to pay them to the council, we agree with Councilwoman JoAnne Mounce: Coverage should be limited to the council member individually and not family members. That limits the city’s exposure and provides a rough equity of compensation.
  • Under city policy, council members are each allotted a travel budget of $2,900 per year. There are no real checks and balances on this travel, and there should be.

Who would review and approve these expenses? That’s admittedly a challenge. It is unfair to ask a council appointee to cast a critical eye on the spending of, in effect, a boss.

So why not let the council’s true bosses, the taxpayers, take a look at this spending? Why not post all council travel expense reports online and include at least of summary of them in council agendas?

As our reporting showed, the cost of council is substantial. As city leaders, especially during times that remain economically challenging, council members have the opportunity — if not the obligation — to set a financially responsible example.

Rules of Conduct

  • 1 Use your real name. You must register with your full first and last name before you can comment. (And don’t pretend you’re someone else.)
  • 2 Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually oriented language.
  • 3 Don’t threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
  • 4 Be truthful. Don't lie about anyone or anything. Don't post unsubstantiated allegations, rumors or gossip that could harm the reputation of a person, company or organization.
  • 5 Be nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
  • 6 Stay on topic. Make sure your comments are about the story. Don’t insult each other.
  • 7 Tell us if the discussion is getting out of hand. Use the ‘Report’ link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
  • 8 Share what you know, and ask about what you don't.
  • 9 Don’t be a troll.
  • 10 Don’t reveal personal information about other commenters. You may reveal your own personal information, but we advise you not to do so.
  • 11 We reserve the right, at our discretion, to monitor, delete or choose not to post any comment. This may include removing or monitoring posts that we believe violate the spirit or letter of these rules, or that we otherwise determine at our discretion needs to be monitored, not posted, or deleted.

Welcome to the discussion.

Recent Comments

Posted 3 hours ago by Andrew Liebich.

article: Letter: Obama may be protecting his chi…

There are 29 sources cited at the end of the video Christina.[sleeping] Can I waste 30 minutes providing you with documented and verifiabl…

More...

Posted 3 hours ago by Jerome Kinderman.

article: We won’t repost Sandy Hook hoax comments

"Troll" defined: "In Internet slang, a troll (/ˈtroʊl/, /ˈtrɒl/) is a person who sows discord on the Internet by starting ar…

More...

Posted 3 hours ago by Mike Adams.

article: Letter: Many states allow guns in schoo…

Simon didn't print the original post which was much better than this one will be: What part of "nah" don't you understand? Why s…

More...

Posted 3 hours ago by Andrew Liebich.

article: We won’t repost Sandy Hook hoax comments

First, the fact that you were "offended" does not make me wrong Mr. Barrow.[lol] Second, the LNS's poll indicates that the major…

More...

Posted 3 hours ago by Thomas Heuer.

article: Letter: The people are better off becau…

Thank you Eric But don't worry about that stock market when the stocks get too lofty they'll split and get more affordable. Mr Taves and …

More...

Video

Popular Stories

Poll

Loading…

Mailing List

Subscribe to a mailing list to have daily news sent directly to your inbox.

  • Breaking News

    Would you like to receive breaking news alerts? Sign up now!

  • News Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily news headlines? Sign up now!

  • Sports Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily sports headlines? Sign up now!

Manage Your Lists