Lodinews.com

default avatar
Welcome to the site! Login or Signup below.
|
||
Logout|My Dashboard

Censoring property records is not a solution for safety

Print
Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size

Posted: Saturday, May 12, 2012 12:00 am | Updated: 9:51 am, Sat May 12, 2012.

Are Occupy protesters in the East Bay Area tracking down police officers using property records and threatening their families?

We've heard that rumor from a couple of sources but haven't confirmed it.

Even if it's not literally true, the possibility of a personal threat arising from electronic records has California cops and other public figures really scared.

First the local angle:

A few weeks ago, a Bay Area police officer called with an odd request: He wanted the names of his children deleted from their grandfather's online obituary.

Why? we asked.

The officer said several members of his department and their families had been harassed. He suspected either members of the Occupy movement or the group Anonymous were behind this. These people had acted on information gleaned from the Web.

He felt vulnerable, he said, and wanted to protect his family.

We asked the relative who actually placed the obituary to contact us, and we removed the names.

Then last week, we learned from newspaper lobbyists that police unions are pushing a bill that would strike the names of public safety employees from county property records.

The custodians of these records, the state's county recorders, are beside themselves. San Joaquin County Recorder Ken Blakemore thinks AB 2299 is a bad idea. So does the board of the California Newspaper Publishers Association.

Why?

First you have to realize how central property records are to the right of property ownership and honest government in our democracy. This system goes back five centuries to when kings and aristocrats thought nothing of seizing a citizen's property on a whim. These records protect citizens from being defrauded and prevent the politically powerful from defrauding the government.

Here's a 21st century for instance: A search of property records has uncovered suspiciously low assessments being granted contributors to the L.A. County Assessors election campaign.

Here are a few hypotheticals:

Spouses in divorces could hide their assets from each other during settlement negotiations. Cops could hide illicit gifts of whole houses and apartment buildings. Terrorists could use county computers to search for properties owned by AB2299-exempt persons and have the addresses of every police officer and dispatcher in a county.

The possible mischief is endless.

But the threat to police officers and any number of citizens is real, too.

How can we have open, honest government and feel secure in our homes?

Blakemore thinks those who inquire about a person's property might be required to give up their own identity. That could create a trail to a crime committed later. But it might lead to powerful people intimidating those who suspect them of impropriety. But it's a thought.

Another is that those who feel threatened ought to create trusts to hold their property. That would mask their identities and make a records search more difficult without completely erasing a trail of wrong-doing.

The answer won't be easy, but censoring our system of property records should be undertaken carefully.

A hasty decision will be regretted by property owners, lenders, neighbors and taxpayers alike.

More about

More about

Rules of Conduct

  • 1 Use your real name. You must register with your full first and last name before you can comment. (And don’t pretend you’re someone else.)
  • 2 Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually oriented language.
  • 3 Don’t threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
  • 4 Be truthful. Don't lie about anyone or anything. Don't post unsubstantiated allegations, rumors or gossip that could harm the reputation of a person, company or organization.
  • 5 Be nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
  • 6 Stay on topic. Make sure your comments are about the story. Don’t insult each other.
  • 7 Tell us if the discussion is getting out of hand. Use the ‘Report’ link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
  • 8 Share what you know, and ask about what you don't.
  • 9 Don’t be a troll.
  • 10 Don’t reveal personal information about other commenters. You may reveal your own personal information, but we advise you not to do so.
  • 11 We reserve the right, at our discretion, to monitor, delete or choose not to post any comment. This may include removing or monitoring posts that we believe violate the spirit or letter of these rules, or that we otherwise determine at our discretion needs to be monitored, not posted, or deleted.

Welcome to the discussion.

2 comments:

  • Bobcatbob Ingram posted at 3:03 pm on Thu, Nov 8, 2012.

    99er Posts: 119

    Terrorist ? Occupiers ? ....going thru property records to find out where the police live ?
    I did a days 'occupy' in Sacramento, Of course the cops were there, some mounted on horses, but none of them caused any troubles to Us 99% ers, they are part of the 99%. I did not see any police singing 'we shall overcome' nor did any tap their night sticks to the rhythm of 'This is what freedom looks like'. But the cops didn't cause anyone any harm, they just did their job.
    I can see you have concerns regarding 'property tax roles' and they may be justified but accusing regular citizens is not the answer to getting to the truth of property fee's.
    Let me suggest 2 alternate routes to justice;
    1) Ban all 'secret ' city council meetings.
    2) VOTE NO on every piece of legislature You can't understand. You are just as smart as the rest of Us and if You can't understand it, we can't understand it.. So help all of Us, "just vote NO" to anything You cannot understand.
    Thanks Respectfully
    Bobcatbob Ingram

     
  • Bobcatbob Ingram posted at 12:29 pm on Wed, Oct 24, 2012.

    99er Posts: 119

    So ...the Occupiers are accused ? .... are You kidding,? or is this just another false flag operation to show that Obama is not protecting Us ??

     

Recent Comments

Posted 1 hour ago by Ted Lauchland.

article: Letter: Darwin’s theory has never been …

The kids are not going to like it. According to your definitions they will now have to go to public school on Saturdays so they can study a…

More...

Posted 1 hour ago by Treacy Elliott.

article: Letter: Obama may be protecting his chi…

Actually Andy if you read the executive order and did some research on the Presidential Records Act you would find that the executive order…

More...

Posted 3 hours ago by Walter Chang.

article: Letter: Joe Guzzardi’s June 20 column c…

"white" E.D. you can't offend me. But for the sake of "forum decorum" please don't try. The most frequent emotion I…

More...

Posted 3 hours ago by Walter Chang.

article: Letter: Darwin’s theory has never been …

"So try to stay focused on the topic at hand and NOT lash out so much!! [thumbup]

More...

Posted 3 hours ago by Walter Chang.

article: Letter: Darwin’s theory has never been …

"star stuff" E.D. you totally missed the mark. Again. Your supposed to lecture the author of this pointless letter - not me!! …

More...

Video

Popular Stories

Poll

Loading…

Your News

News for the community, by the community.

Mailing List

Subscribe to a mailing list to have daily news sent directly to your inbox.

  • Breaking News

    Would you like to receive breaking news alerts? Sign up now!

  • News Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily news headlines? Sign up now!

  • Sports Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily sports headlines? Sign up now!

Manage Your Lists