Lodinews.com

default avatar
Welcome to the site! Login or Signup below.
|
||
Logout|My Dashboard

Steve Hansen: Teen did good — without being from ‘protected class’

Print
Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size

Posted: Wednesday, September 4, 2013 12:00 am

Congratulations to Lodi High School teenager Grant Goehring for leading a charge that lifted the Dollar Tree’s student restrictions. Under the former policy, only two students were allowed in the store at the same time.

Goehring’s accomplishment was really quite remarkable, considering that teenagers are not considered a “protected class.”

So, what’s a protected class?

Over the last several years, our courts, legislators and administrative agencies have paralleled George Orwell’s famous novel “Animal Farm” about a socialist “utopia” in which “all animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others.”

Due to years of discrimination against African-Americans, women and others, courts and legislators have acted on the premise that the Declaration of Independence phrase of “all men are created equal” needs a modern-day review and interpretation.

Since all men had not been treated equally for more than 180 years after those words were written, laws have been created to “make whole” victims of former wrongdoings by granting some people “more” equality. The idea has been to create “real equality” by defining protected classes of people who share the race or gender of people who have been discriminated against — thus making descendents of the powerful “less equal.”

Does that make sense to anyone?

In a paradoxical attempt to eliminate discrimination, a number of court cases have defined this new class structure. Basically, these protected classes of people fit into categories, a hierarchy with the potential for victimization that is examined in one of three ways:

1. Strict scrutiny: People in this category generally come under the umbrella of discrimination because of race or national origin. Their specific situations come under “strict scrutiny” by the courts. They have the most legal protection.

2. Intermediate scrutiny: These people are not quite in the same category as the first, but they still receive extra protection from possible acts of discrimination. This class includes women and homosexuals. (California gives first-class “strict scrutiny” for the latter, based on its own laws and court decisions.)

3. Weak scrutiny: This category of potential victims bears a rational burden of proof to show discrimination. They include, for example, those discriminated against becase of their age (40 and older), disability and political affiliation.

Other types of people have qualified under one of these three protected classes: members of a religion, pregnant women, people of certain genetic or familial status, former members of the armed services — even those convicted of a felony.

There’s a fourth category as well. This is the “unprotected” class, which is just about everyone else. It includes teenagers and children.

Based on this developed class system, you can see why Goehring’s accomplishment is to be recognized. He and his friends are “fourth-class citizens” — well, they are placed in the last category. Yet with the help of the Lodi News-Sentinel, they managed to undo an act of discrimination against a generally unprotected group.

Of course, the opinions of this column are not to be viewed in the same way that lawyers or legislators might frame this subject, but rather one man’s view derived from the basic facts. Maybe this protected class system explains why there is now such a push from a number of other groups and individuals to become members of the first two — or at least slide into No. 3 and work their way to the top.

But looking at the big picture, perhaps one historian friend of mine summed it up best: “No one wants equality. What everyone really wants is superiority.”

Steve Hansen is a Lodi writer.

More about

More about

More about

Rules of Conduct

  • 1 Use your real name. You must register with your full first and last name before you can comment. (And don’t pretend you’re someone else.)
  • 2 Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually oriented language.
  • 3 Don’t threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
  • 4 Be truthful. Don't lie about anyone or anything. Don't post unsubstantiated allegations, rumors or gossip that could harm the reputation of a person, company or organization.
  • 5 Be nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
  • 6 Stay on topic. Make sure your comments are about the story. Don’t insult each other.
  • 7 Tell us if the discussion is getting out of hand. Use the ‘Report’ link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
  • 8 Share what you know, and ask about what you don't.
  • 9 Don’t be a troll.
  • 10 Don’t reveal personal information about other commenters. You may reveal your own personal information, but we advise you not to do so.
  • 11 We reserve the right, at our discretion, to monitor, delete or choose not to post any comment. This may include removing or monitoring posts that we believe violate the spirit or letter of these rules, or that we otherwise determine at our discretion needs to be monitored, not posted, or deleted.

Welcome to the discussion.

6 comments:

  • Joanne Bobin posted at 2:32 pm on Thu, Sep 5, 2013.

    Joanne Bobin Posts: 4488

    Thanks for the information, Mr. Birch. Appreciate that explanation.

     
  • Simon Birch posted at 10:55 am on Thu, Sep 5, 2013.

    Simon Birch - Online Manager Posts: 164 Staff

    Joanne: When 3 different people click the "report" link, the comment is automatically removed. I or one of the other admins then have the option to restore the comment.

     
  • Joanne Bobin posted at 9:34 am on Thu, Sep 5, 2013.

    Joanne Bobin Posts: 4488

    Sorry, Mr. Tillett - I clicked on "report" instead of "reply" by mistake.

    Hope your comment is not deleted - although I'm STILL not sure of the protocol for deleting comments. You can click on "report" all day and still an offensive comment will stand in this forum.

    My original post from yesterday AM about "educated" people was gone within minutes!

    Perhaps we are misinterpreting here and Dr. Hansen is still writing satire?

    I'm guessing "no."

     
  • Jeff Tillett posted at 8:38 am on Thu, Sep 5, 2013.

    Jeff Tillett Posts: 551

    Well he also purports that discrimination is a thing of the past by using the past tense. Whew, I'm glad to hear no one is being discriminated against on the basis of their race, religion, sex, or sexual preference, nor have they for the last 50-60 years, according to our esteemed writer, formerly known as satirist.

    Also, he confuses the concepts of slavery and discrimination, blithely omitting the former.

     
  • Joanne Bobin posted at 5:04 pm on Wed, Sep 4, 2013.

    Joanne Bobin Posts: 4488

    I wonder why no one has ever complained that both Flame Liquors has and Apple Market had the same policy - only allowing 2 students in the store at a time when school was letting out?

    Flame had that policy in effect even before it changed hands several years ago, when Pete G. owned it.

    These stores have obviously been subject to high amounts of theft. Is it possible that they were only "guessing" who the culprits were?

     
  • Joanne Bobin posted at 4:54 pm on Wed, Sep 4, 2013.

    Joanne Bobin Posts: 4488

    Seriously? Stating that so-called "educated" people are less than educated in their thinking is offensive?

    If anything, this column is downright racist and sexist. If that opinion is a problem, please delete this comment.

    Otherwise, Dr. Hansen should stand up to his critics.

     

Recent Comments

Posted 14 hours ago by Todd Cronin.

article: Letter: Nurse’s strike is a sham, disgr…

Here, here edward! This strike is a sham! A disgrace! A mockery! But truth be told, Fielding Melish said it best... (paraphrased for contex…

More...

Posted 16 hours ago by Ed Walters.

article: Steve Hansen: Reclaiming history from t…

Impossible to believe that more than 2-3 people at most had anything to do with the assassination of JFK, and not Lee Harvey Oswald. The …

More...

Posted 18 hours ago by Mike Adams.

article: Letter: Let’s vote to get our wonderful…

Jien: Simon isn't letting me call joe on this post. I've have submitted rebuttals twice already and not scene a one. But it does point ou…

More...

Posted 18 hours ago by Thomas Heuer.

Posted 19 hours ago by Thomas Heuer.

article: Letter: Failures by the Democratic Part…

Mike Good point and I apologize for the hiccup or echo or rapid spastic finger twitch of the last sentence sentence. [wink]

More...

Video

Popular Stories

Poll

Loading…

Your News

News for the community, by the community.

Featured Events

CREATE AN EVENT

Mailing List

Subscribe to a mailing list to have daily news sent directly to your inbox.

  • Breaking News

    Would you like to receive breaking news alerts? Sign up now!

  • News Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily news headlines? Sign up now!

  • Sports Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily sports headlines? Sign up now!

Manage Your Lists