default avatar
Welcome to the site! Login or Signup below.
Logout|My Dashboard

Steve Hansen: Eliminating tenure may not be the best course of action

Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size

Posted: Tuesday, June 17, 2014 12:00 am

Local historian Greg Gores taught his classes a common adage. The precept was heard in the Soviet Union long before its demise in the 1980s. Loosely translated and echoed by the workers, it was: “They pretend to dictate the impossible and we pretend to carry it out.”

While the 20th century Russian empire may have collapsed, its methodology can still be found in the American public school system, which has been “reforming” education for almost six decades.

A characteristic shared with the old USSR, along with other communist countries, is top-down, centralized planning. In the case of our schools, it comes from lawmakers — coupled with details created by federal and state agencies.

As comparative examples, the Soviets and Chinese had their Five Year Plan and Great Leap Forward. American public schools had Goals 2000 and still have the remnants of No Child Left Behind.

The objectives always look great on paper but usually fail in the end. When that happens, the fault is never placed at the feet of those who created the strategies. Instead, it is blamed on the workers, who were ordered to carry out the mechanics of the “impossible.”

If the goals of a plan are not met, the situation is re-evaluated and a new one is formulated — often with the same results. In schools, this has been going on since 1957, when the Russians awakened a sleepy America with the launch of the first space satellite.

The latest “blame the workers” campaign is an attack by a California judge, who reportedly found teacher tenure to be “unconstitutional.” Apparently, the “evidence” presented was that “ineffective” teachers were being unfairly placed in low-income neighborhoods.

Whether or not objective and well-researched facts would support this conclusion is questionable. This case will be appealed.

But taking a second look, is a failing educational system really the fault of our teachers, or is it simply another example of placing blame for failure to “pretend to carry out the impossible”?

First of all, many people have forgotten why tenure was created. There are basically two reasons: One is to prevent teachers from being dismissed for political reasons. The second is to encourage young educators, who have high turnover rates, to stay in a difficult profession that demands the “impossible.”

Is this to say that there are no incompetent teachers out there? Of course not. That would be the same as saying there are no incompetent politicians, accountants, contractors, doctors, lawyers, judges or laggards in any other profession. And yes, there are those who have appointments with these people tomorrow!

On the other hand, it is difficult and expensive to fire an unproductive teacher in California. The long “due process” procedure can go on for many months — even years — while a teacher in question can sit home and collect full salary. The price to a school district can be over $200,000, and chances are good that the district will lose anyway.

The solution? Maybe it is some kind of compromise that protects teachers from political harassment, but at the same time streamlines procedures for moving out the obviously incompetent.

Also, part of this solution should be moving school curricula and other important decisions back into the hands of the local districts, where realistic objectives can be formulated. At that level, specific needs of community students can be better served. If we took the bureaucratic chains off teachers, who knows what creative competencies might emerge?

A University of the Pacific School of Education professor summed up the problem of centralized planning. He told me, “No new idea in education lasts longer than two years.”

However, the insightful scholar may have underestimated the real progress made over the last half-century. Because of this advancement, it might be more accurate to say, “No new idea in education lasts longer than five years.”

Steve Hansen is a Lodi writer.

Rules of Conduct

  • 1 Use your real name. You must register with your full first and last name before you can comment. (And don’t pretend you’re someone else.)
  • 2 Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually oriented language.
  • 3 Don’t threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
  • 4 Be truthful. Don't lie about anyone or anything. Don't post unsubstantiated allegations, rumors or gossip that could harm the reputation of a person, company or organization.
  • 5 Be nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
  • 6 Stay on topic. Make sure your comments are about the story. Don’t insult each other.
  • 7 Tell us if the discussion is getting out of hand. Use the ‘Report’ link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
  • 8 Share what you know, and ask about what you don't.
  • 9 Don’t be a troll.
  • 10 Don’t reveal personal information about other commenters. You may reveal your own personal information, but we advise you not to do so.
  • 11 We reserve the right, at our discretion, to monitor, delete or choose not to post any comment. This may include removing or monitoring posts that we believe violate the spirit or letter of these rules, or that we otherwise determine at our discretion needs to be monitored, not posted, or deleted.

Welcome to the discussion.

1 comment:

  • John Slaughterback posted at 2:30 pm on Tue, Jun 17, 2014.

    musttry Posts: 14

    I have personally experienced, in my youth on two occasions teachers who had little interest or desire to teach. This makes them incompetent.
    Management is always on the look out for good employees, and will put out an extra effort to keep that employee. If management is not in their corner, it's an indication something is amiss.


Recent Comments

Posted 19 hours ago by Jien Kaur.

article: Letter: Ron Portal’s letters repeat the…

So very much the truth Mr Adams - but you forgot to make the mention of the man who spend the millions and finally discover that the Mr Oba…


Posted 19 hours ago by Michael Fiske.

article: Letter: Suggestions for committee appoi…

Ed, everybody knows JoAnne hates Bob. If you don't know that than you don't know squat! Open your eyes. She campaigned against two candidat…


Posted 20 hours ago by Jien Kaur.

article: Letter: Our leaders need to be better r…

The Mr Kindseth wrote that 'America’s attitude toward Royal Emperor Obama changed when he went from “We the People” to “Screw the People”' …


Posted 20 hours ago by Thomas Heuer.

article: Steve Hansen: Funding, researcher bias …

Skepticism is a smart way of saying "I DON'T KNOW." No more no less. It is not a lofty intellectual endeavor. It is used by the …


Posted 20 hours ago by Mike Adams.

article: Letter: Ron Portal’s letters repeat the…

A correct assumption instead: Mr. Portal, like most conservatives, utilize information that is not true and when they do use the correct …



Popular Stories



Your News

News for the community, by the community.

Mailing List

Subscribe to a mailing list to have daily news sent directly to your inbox.

  • Breaking News

    Would you like to receive breaking news alerts? Sign up now!

  • News Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily news headlines? Sign up now!

  • Sports Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily sports headlines? Sign up now!

Manage Your Lists