Lodinews.com

default avatar
Welcome to the site! Login or Signup below.
|
||
Logout|My Dashboard

Steve Hansen Don’t scoff at reports of UFOs until you read this

Print
Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size

Steve Hansen

Posted: Tuesday, April 24, 2012 12:00 am | Updated: 6:32 am, Tue Apr 24, 2012.

UFOs over Lodi? No way! Well, on second thought, maybe.

For a little bit of history, let's go back a few decades and take a look one of the most famous UFO cases. That was the 1947 Roswell, N.M. incident.

Here's how the story looks based on a newspaper account and government documents:

It began with a headline-grabber in the Roswell Daily Record on July 8, 1947, stating, "RAAF Captures Flying Saucer On Ranch in Roswell Region." The story was released to the press by the 509th Bomber Group public relations officer, Lt. Walter G. Haut.

Brig. Gen. Roger Ramey, upon directives from his superiors, quickly ordered a reversal and an apparent cover-up. The following day, he held a press conference with Major Jesse Marcel and General T.J. DuBose, stating that the debris found was simply a weather balloon.

Many years later, both Haut and Marcel admitted that the cover-up story was bogus.

FBI records also tell a different tale from the official version. A memo that can be found today on the FBI website, dated March 22, 1950, from Special Agent in Charge Guy Hottel to Director J. Edgar Hoover, reported the following: "An investigator from the Air Force stated that three so-called flying saucers have been recovered in New Mexico. They were described as being circular in shape with raised centers, approximately 50 feet in diameter. Each one was occupied by three bodies of human shape, but only 3 feet tall, dressed in metallic cloth of a very fine texture."

Shortly after the Roswell incident, another FBI memo, dated July 24, 1947, to Assistant Director D.M. Ladd from Agent E.G. Fitch, revealed the following:

"The Director noted on the referenced memorandum, 'I would do it but before agreeing to it we must insist upon full access to discs recovered. For instance, in the La. case the Army grabbed it and would not let us have it for cursory evaluation.'"

Yet another memo to J. Edgar Hoover and D. M. Ladd from SAC Harry M. Kimball, dated Sept. 19, 1947, states:

"It is my understanding from recent Bureau Instructions that we are to assist the Air Force Intelligence personnel in the investigation of flying disc incidents. However, it will be noted from the attached letter that it is Army interpretation that it was their intent that the Bureau would investigate those so-called 'discs' being found on the ground and apparently not those which are observed only in flight."

These memoranda are only small samplings of thousands of declassified and released government documents from around the world relating to Roswell and other UFO cases. They are available for those who want to do the research. Untold others remain classified, heavily censored or have been "lost" over decades.

For several years, Air Force spokespeople have provided various "logical explanations" to try and account for the Roswell mystery, ranging from weather balloons to dropped crash dummies. However, facts can be hard to suppress once released.

The real question for most is: If the story were true, why would the government want to keep this incredible tale a secret? Speculation includes the following: The government wants to: 1. obtain advanced technology for defensive purposes and prevent it from falling into the hands of adversaries; 2. prevent chaos from a destruction of present scientific, social and religious belief systems; or 3. maintain control of the population by avoiding possible worship and loyalty to an advanced extraterrestrial civilization.

So, were there really UFOs over Lodi? Has there been a government cover-up of the worldwide unidentified flying object phenomena? Are we being visited and observed by aliens?

You decide.

Steve Hansen is a Lodi writer.

Rules of Conduct

  • 1 Use your real name. You must register with your full first and last name before you can comment. (And don’t pretend you’re someone else.)
  • 2 Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually oriented language.
  • 3 Don’t threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
  • 4 Be truthful. Don't lie about anyone or anything. Don't post unsubstantiated allegations, rumors or gossip that could harm the reputation of a person, company or organization.
  • 5 Be nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
  • 6 Stay on topic. Make sure your comments are about the story. Don’t insult each other.
  • 7 Tell us if the discussion is getting out of hand. Use the ‘Report’ link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
  • 8 Share what you know, and ask about what you don't.
  • 9 Don’t be a troll.
  • 10 Don’t reveal personal information about other commenters. You may reveal your own personal information, but we advise you not to do so.
  • 11 We reserve the right, at our discretion, to monitor, delete or choose not to post any comment. This may include removing or monitoring posts that we believe violate the spirit or letter of these rules, or that we otherwise determine at our discretion needs to be monitored, not posted, or deleted.

Welcome to the discussion.

1 comment:

  • Peter Bellville posted at 6:20 pm on Tue, May 1, 2012.

    gopher Posts: 26

    From all the memos Mr. Hansen quotes, the government is doing a lousy job of covering up the evidence. But evidence for what? The government can't win this one. A lack of evidence means the governmnent is covering something up no matter what you think. This kind of paranoia serves no purpose. Lack of evidence from the government does not constitute proof UFOs exist. That is a negative form of proof that doesn't hold up. You don't need the government to form an opinion. Something is out there, for sure, we just don't know what it is. Did you see the video of the UFO that settled over the Dome of the Rock? This happend recently and was recorded from a couple different angles simutaneously. Google it. There is no explanation for it that I know of.

     

Recent Comments

Posted 5 hours ago by Steve Schmidt.

article: Letter: Decisions of leaders should be …

What is a "digester roof top"?

More...

Posted 5 hours ago by Steve Schmidt.

article: Letter: Friend’s car was wrongfully tow…

Why would anyone move to an uninhabitable hell hole like Arizona? Between the snakes under the rocks and the snakes in the state house you…

More...

Posted 5 hours ago by Steve Schmidt.

article: Letter: Surprised by water bill

Mr Cooper, you are welcome to collect "what God provides free of charge" in rain barrels or cisterns. As for the stuff that flows…

More...

Posted 5 hours ago by Steve Schmidt.

article: Letter: Fed up with the fuel tax

If people want to drive let them pay for the roads. The more you use them, the more you pay. What could be fairer than that?

More...

Posted 16 hours ago by Kevin Paglia.

article: Letter: Fed up with the fuel tax

Mike, are you saying the Republicans snuck this bill past the Liberal controlled government of California? This gas tax that would make dr…

More...

Video

Popular Stories

Poll

Loading…

Your News

News for the community, by the community.

Mailing List

Subscribe to a mailing list to have daily news sent directly to your inbox.

  • Breaking News

    Would you like to receive breaking news alerts? Sign up now!

  • News Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily news headlines? Sign up now!

  • Sports Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily sports headlines? Sign up now!

Manage Your Lists