default avatar
Welcome to the site! Login or Signup below.
Logout|My Dashboard

Do we need a college in Lodi? We need common sense, not a college campus

Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size

Posted: Saturday, April 27, 2013 12:00 am

Create a new college in Lodi? I simply have to ask the following: "Why?"

Why would taxpayers want to spend millions of dollars we don't have just to create another public educational bureaucracy?

OK, so what about a private institution coming to town? Same story, same problem: high costs, low returns. Billions of dollars in unpaid taxpayer-backed loans for both public and overpriced private institutions are now reaching an all-time high at close to $900 billion!

It would be one thing if hard-earned dollars from our working citizens would produce graduates who earned higher incomes and returned these investments to our community. No doubt, many college-degreed folks do just that.

But let's look at some of the courses we are now directly or indirectly paying for at some of our nation's most prestigious universities and colleges: Occidental College, "The Unbearable Whiteness of Barbie;" Johns Hopkins, "Sex, Drugs and Rock 'n' Roll in Ancient Egypt;" Swathmore College, "Lesbian Novels Since World War II;" and Amherst College, "Taking Marx Seriously: Should Marx be given another chance?"

Here are some college majors being offered that don't seem to have much employer demand either: University of Nevada, Reno: "Basque Studies;" University of Connecticut: "Puppetry;" Bard College: "Victorian Studies;" and Plymouth State University: "Adventure Education."

Now I'm sure these courses and majors have value to some, but do they justify the sacrifices of hard-working restaurant employees, construction workers, technicians, teachers, business people and others who are forced to shell out parts of their paychecks and provide for these "quality" classes and programs?

Admittedly, many postsecondary programs offer useful majors such as forestry, environmental studies, social work and English literature. But unfortunately, these and others like them have most of their value in jobs that are dependent on government.

So other questions must be raised: Do unchecked numbers of people in these programs make sense for our future when the country is $17 trillion in debt and still spending beyond its means at the rate of four billion dollars per day? Do these duplicated programs have value in a state that has one of the nation's highest tax rates?

Even majors that have been desirable for decades are now in jeopardy. Take law, for example. Today's law school graduates are discovering that jobs in their profession are difficult to find. Stanford graduates are fortunate to have a success rate of 91 percent. However, less prestigious but equally qualified students can have a job obtainment rate as low as 17 percent!

Today, postsecondary schools should emphasize education that encourages independence and self-reliance, not governmental or other institutional dependence. Eventually, the latter will only lead to financial disaster for everyone.

They should not be filling the marketplace with too many people chasing too few jobs. Here are two examples to illustrate the point: On the positive side, we could use more physicians and physician assistants, as their skills will soon be in demand.

On the other hand, approximately 225,000 present members of the State Bar of California should be more than adequate to fulfill our legal needs for the foreseeable future. Cranking out an unlimited number of law school graduates in today's world is not a wise use of limited funds.

There was a time in America when we could afford the "fluff" and justify academics for academics' sake. But sadly, those days are gone forever.

Steve Hansen is a regular columnist for the Lodi News Sentinel.

Rules of Conduct

  • 1 Use your real name. You must register with your full first and last name before you can comment. (And don’t pretend you’re someone else.)
  • 2 Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually oriented language.
  • 3 Don’t threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
  • 4 Be truthful. Don't lie about anyone or anything. Don't post unsubstantiated allegations, rumors or gossip that could harm the reputation of a person, company or organization.
  • 5 Be nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
  • 6 Stay on topic. Make sure your comments are about the story. Don’t insult each other.
  • 7 Tell us if the discussion is getting out of hand. Use the ‘Report’ link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
  • 8 Share what you know, and ask about what you don't.
  • 9 Don’t be a troll.
  • 10 Don’t reveal personal information about other commenters. You may reveal your own personal information, but we advise you not to do so.
  • 11 We reserve the right, at our discretion, to monitor, delete or choose not to post any comment. This may include removing or monitoring posts that we believe violate the spirit or letter of these rules, or that we otherwise determine at our discretion needs to be monitored, not posted, or deleted.

Welcome to the discussion.


  • Dean Tiernan posted at 4:20 pm on Fri, May 3, 2013.

    Dean Tiernan Posts: 18

    Exactly why would we select those colleges except to prove your point, Steve. Why not be a little more realistic and look at Delta, Sac State and City as well as Turkey Tech? Because they don't serve your point. If you look at a period in college life, you probably really like, why not take a look at the curriculum at UC Berkeley in the 60s. There weren't any courses being taught about student sit ins or language to use on campus. Bomb building for the SDS? If you object to the money being spend, how about a cogent well reasoned argument?

  • John Slaughterback posted at 11:12 am on Wed, May 1, 2013.

    musttry Posts: 14

    Mr. Steve Hanson, your common sense editorial has shown us the negatives of such an endeavor, but your arguments won’t change the fact bureaucrats will spend millions of dollars on such projects.
    Mr. Huyett’s, common sense editorial envisions many benefits from millions of dollars the bureaucrats will spend somewhere! He is advocating why not spend these dollars here in the city of Lodi, and enjoy all the benefits of such an endeavor!

  • trista aquino posted at 1:59 am on Sun, Apr 28, 2013.

    trista aquino Posts: 113

    That's so true. Maybe adding a mandatory class on "credit" to the high school curriculum might help us be a little more responsible w/ our own debt leading compulsive spending habits ourselves.


Recent Comments

Posted 13 hours ago by Angie McDaniel.

article: Steve Hansen: Climate change is real, b…

So you admit that Dr. Powell is NOT a relevant expert?


Posted 14 hours ago by Simon Birch.

article: Lodi City Council candidates talk jobs,…

The video of the forum is almost 2 hours long. It took awhile to process. It's now online.


Posted 14 hours ago by Jien Kaur.

article: Letter: Vote for a better future for all

This must be most similar to the Sarah Palin who make this claim (and before speak about some of the people are the real American and not o…


Posted 14 hours ago by Jien Kaur.

article: Steve Hansen: Climate change is real, b…

This show interest in juvenile exchanges rather than mature thought.


Posted 14 hours ago by Jien Kaur.

article: Gwin Paden: On learning Welsh, and kind…

This has to be one of the strangest and most ill inform claim I have heard. I think you should go back and do some research Mr Lauchland.



Popular Stories



Your News

News for the community, by the community.

Mailing List

Subscribe to a mailing list to have daily news sent directly to your inbox.

  • Breaking News

    Would you like to receive breaking news alerts? Sign up now!

  • News Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily news headlines? Sign up now!

  • Sports Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily sports headlines? Sign up now!

Manage Your Lists