Lodinews.com

default avatar
Welcome to the site! Login or Signup below.
|
||
Logout|My Dashboard

Steve Hansen Lodi Unified School District leaders see the light on college prep

Print
Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size

Steve Hansen

Posted: Wednesday, November 16, 2011 12:00 am | Updated: 6:39 am, Wed Nov 16, 2011.

"No new idea in education lasts more than two years," a University of the Pacific professor once told me. His length of time (more like five years rather than two) may have been off, but his premise was absolutely correct.

So goes the idea that all high school kids should take college-prep classes. Those of us working in the trenches saw this as a bad idea from the beginning. But the world of education is not a democracy. Curriculum polices are decreed on high by state legislators and others in authority. Rarely are those on the assembly line, working with the day-to-day realities, consulted. Thus, like the old Soviet Union, policies are usually doomed to fail. This has been going on nationally since education "reforms" first began in 1957.

Shortly before I left the system, I got a call from an angry parent who accused me of placing her child in the wrong class.

"He should be in college-prep," she complained. "You put him in remedial."

"No, ma'am," I corrected her. "He is properly placed in 'college-prep' English."

"That's impossible!" she retorted. "There are kids in there who can barely write their own names."

"Welcome to the world of modern public education," I said.

Another example of a bureaucratic misstep was the setting of benchmarks of progress by those in the State Department of Education, designed to please their legislator bosses.

Back in the 1990s, I attended a meeting led by a state department representative. Her message was this: "We expect our goal to be reached that 90 percent of your students will be in at least the 50th percentile on standardized testing."

Those of us in the audience who knew something about mathematics had to quietly laugh. It is statistically impossible to have 90 percent of a large sample of heterogeneous students in the 50th percentile. Needless to say, that goal was never achieved.

What's even more ironic is that even if the objective of "all kids should go to college" were achieved, it would create a lot of overqualified people for jobs that don't exist. With the exception of a few specific occupations such as in technology, science and health care, there are no shortages of college graduate positions.

The paper is not full of ads stating, "Wanted: philosophy, ethnic studies, women's issues and other liberal arts majors for exciting careers. Six-figure starting salaries await you."

Over-stimulating the college-education-required job market with thousands of applicants only LOWERS salaries and standards of living. It does not raise them.

On the other hand, the shortage of HIGHLY SKILLED contractors, small retail business owners, carpenters, mechanics, machinists, plumbers, cabinet-makers, heating/air conditioning experts, service workers and even truck drivers is an issue, especially as the economy recovers. Many of these occupations provide a higher income than those earned by college graduates. These people can always make independent livings, as their training is not limited to government-created occupations.

I'm glad that the leaders of the Lodi Unified School District have seen the light and decided that reality cannot be ignored. In the past, it pained me greatly to watch many good kids fail because the system saw its own goals of idealism as far more important than meeting individual student academic needs.

The damage done to the self-esteem of some of our kids, who sit in algebra classes day after day and year after year, must be irreparable. Some of them don't know how to make change for a quarter and can't show you three-eighths of an inch on a ruler.

I just hope our state and federal legislators get the message as well.

Steve Hansen is a Lodi writer.

Rules of Conduct

  • 1 Use your real name. You must register with your full first and last name before you can comment. (And don’t pretend you’re someone else.)
  • 2 Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually oriented language.
  • 3 Don’t threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
  • 4 Be truthful. Don't lie about anyone or anything. Don't post unsubstantiated allegations, rumors or gossip that could harm the reputation of a person, company or organization.
  • 5 Be nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
  • 6 Stay on topic. Make sure your comments are about the story. Don’t insult each other.
  • 7 Tell us if the discussion is getting out of hand. Use the ‘Report’ link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
  • 8 Share what you know, and ask about what you don't.
  • 9 Don’t be a troll.
  • 10 Don’t reveal personal information about other commenters. You may reveal your own personal information, but we advise you not to do so.
  • 11 We reserve the right, at our discretion, to monitor, delete or choose not to post any comment. This may include removing or monitoring posts that we believe violate the spirit or letter of these rules, or that we otherwise determine at our discretion needs to be monitored, not posted, or deleted.

Welcome to the discussion.

Recent Comments

Posted 12 hours ago by Christina Welch.

article: Letter: Thanks for the discussion on th…

The questions I have asked have been to you, M, for your point of view, I and I had to repeat myself because you never answered the first t…

More...

Posted 15 hours ago by Ed Walters.

article: Letter: We must deal with Islamic State…

I seldom agree with anyone, however Paglia got it right, ISIS is a major threat, and at the present time they continue to grow. The bombin…

More...

Posted 16 hours ago by Thomas Heuer.

article: Letter: We must deal with Islamic State…

Kevin Your "As for ISIS, ANYTHING the West does to stop them will only strengthen their cause. The action HAS to come from the Middle …

More...

Posted 16 hours ago by Michael Nedderman.

article: Letter: Thanks for the discussion on th…

Finally, M, you did something right! Now I can show you how it is done! This is how you answer a hypothetical question: In response to y…

More...

Posted 16 hours ago by Thomas Heuer.

article: Letter: Thanks for the discussion on th…

Mr Doyle Be advised that Mr Nedderton doesn't like answering questions. Your questions can only be considered secondary, or tertiary or non…

More...

Video

Popular Stories

Poll

Loading…

Your News

News for the community, by the community.

Mailing List

Subscribe to a mailing list to have daily news sent directly to your inbox.

  • Breaking News

    Would you like to receive breaking news alerts? Sign up now!

  • News Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily news headlines? Sign up now!

  • Sports Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily sports headlines? Sign up now!

Manage Your Lists